Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07231055

Comparative Trial of Custom-Made Titanium Plates Versus 3D Lambda Plates for Mandibular Subcondylar Fractures

This randomized clinical trial compares virtually designed custom-made titanium plates with conventional three-dimensional (3D) lambda plates for the fixation of mandibular subcondylar fractures. A total of 24 fracture sites will be treated using a retromandibular trans-masseteric approach and evaluated through virtual surgical planning, radiographic analysis, and functional outcomes. The study aims to determine whether customized plates provide superior anatomical accuracy, stability, and recovery compared with standard 3D plates.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

21 year–55 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University.

Tanta, Gharbia Governorate, 31527, Egypt

About this study

Mandibular subcondylar fractures can affect occlusion, mandibular function, and facial symmetry, and remain a topic of ongoing clinical debate regarding optimal fixation methods. Conventional management often relies on standardized three-dimensional (3D) plates, such as the lambda configuration, which provides reliable fixation but may not precisely conform to the individual patient's anatomy.

Advances in virtual surgical planning (VSP) and computer-aided design now allow for the fabrication of patient-specific titanium plates that follow the exact contours of each patient's mandibular anatomy. These customized implants may improve reduction accuracy, minimize inter-fragmentary gaps, enhance postoperative stability, and reduce intraoperative manipulation.

In this study, 24 subcondylar fracture sites will be randomly assigned to either a patient-specific custom-made plate group or a conventional 3D lambda plate group. All procedures will be performed using the retromandibular trans-masseteric approach. Preoperative planning will include CT-based segmentation, virtual fracture reduction, and 3D model generation. Postoperative follow-up will be conducted at multiple intervals to assess radiographic bone healing, condylar and gonial width symmetry, inter-fragmentary gap, mandibular function, pain scores, occlusion, edema, and soft tissue healing.

The study seeks to evaluate whether the use of a customized fixation system results in measurable improvements in surgical precision and functional recovery compared with standard 3D plating techniques. Findings from this clinical trial may support evidence-based decision-making in the selection of fixation systems for subcondylar fractures and clarify the potential clinical benefits of patient-specific implant technology.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult Patients with mandibular subcondylar fracture indicated for open reduction and internal fixation.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with systemic diseases that affect tissue healing.
  • Mandibular condylar head or neck fractures. (Condylar neck is the where the caudal portion of the joint capsule attaches. It is the thin constricted area immediately below the condylar head.)

Treatment and study plan

Custom-Made Plate Group

Device

Virtually designed Patient-specific titanium plate fabricated using virtual surgical planning, CT-based segmentation, and 3D design for fixation of mandibular subcondylar fractures.

Three-Dimensional Lambda Plate

Device

Standard ready-made three-dimensional titanium lambda plate used for open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular subcondylar fractures.

Primary outcomes

  1. Operative time

    Time frame: Intraoperative (recorded during the surgical procedure)

    The total operative time required to perform open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular subcondylar fractures, measured from incision to completion of fixation. The outcome will be compared between the custom-made titanium plate group and the 3D lambda plate group.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Scor (VAS)

    Time frame: Immediate postoperative, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months.

    Visual Analog Scale score to assess postoperative pain intensity over time.

  2. Occlusal Function (Uglesic Score)

    Time frame: 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months.

    Evaluation of occlusal stability and masticatory function using the Uglesic et al. (1993) occlusion questionnaire.

  3. Mouth Opening (Maximum Inter-Incisal Distance, mm)

    Time frame: Preoperative, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months.

    Measurement of maximal mouth opening to evaluate functional recovery.

  4. Radiographic Bone Healing (Computed Tomography Evaluation)

    Time frame: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months.

    Computed Tomography based evaluation of bone union, accuracy of reduction and consolidation at the fracture site.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Tanta University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Virtually Designed Custom-Made Titanium Plate Versus Three-Dimensional Lambda Plate for Management of Mandibular Subcondylar Fractures: (A Randomized Controlled Trial)

Acronym: SUBCONDPLATE

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Nov 17, 2025
Registry last updated
Nov 17, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.