Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00064701

Comparative Study of Modified Release (MR) Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in de Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients

The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclosporine/MMF and tacrolimus modified release/MMF in de novo kidney transplant recipients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

12 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Porto Alegre, Brazil

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This was a 3 arm randomized, open-label, comparative, multi-center study in de novo kidney transplant recipients at 60 centers in the U.S., Canada and Brazil.

The study consisted of a 1-year post-transplant efficacy and safety study with a clinical continuation phase of a minimum of 2 years or until commercial availability of tacrolimus modified release, unless the Data Safety Monitoring Board or sponsor specified otherwise.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Recipient of a primary or retransplanted non-human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical living or non-HLA-identical cadaveric kidney transplant
  • Age greater or equal to 12 years

Exclusion criteria

  • Recipient or donor is known seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
  • Has current malignancy or history of malignancy
  • Has significant liver disease
  • Has uncontrolled concomitant infection or any other unstable medical condition
  • Is receiving everolimus or enteric coated mycophenolic acid at any time during the study
  • Received kidney with a cold ischemia time of equal or more than 36 hours
  • Received kidney transplant from a cadaveric donor equal or more than 60 years of age
  • Received intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy prior to randomization

Treatment and study plan

Tacrolimus Modified Release (MR)

Drug

The target range for whole blood tacrolimus trough concentrations was 7 to 16 ng/mL for days 0 through 90, and 5 to 15 ng/mL thereafter.

Other names: Advagraf, FK506, FKMR, MR4, Astagraf XL

Tacrolimus

Drug

The target range for whole blood tacrolimus trough concentrations was the recommended trough concentration range for Prograf: 7 to 16 ng/mL for days 0 through 90 and 5 to 15 ng/mL thereafter.

Other names: Prograf, FK506

Cyclosporine microemulsion

Drug

The target range for whole blood cyclosporine trough concentrations was 125 to 400 ng/mL for days 0 through 90, and 100 to 300 ng/mL thereafter.

Other names: Neoral, CsA

Mycophenolate mofetil

Drug

Oral

Other names: CellCept, MMF

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Efficacy Failure

    Time frame: one year

    Efficacy failure is defined as any participant who died, experienced a graft failure (permanent return to dialysis [> 30 days] or retransplant), had a biopsy-confirmed (Banff Grade ≥ I) acute rejection (BCAR), or was lost to follow-up.

    Biopsies were graded according to the 1997 Banff criteria:

    Borderline: No intimal arteritis present but foci of mild tubulitis; Grade I: Significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate to severe tubulitis; Grade II: Mild to severe intimal arteritis Grade III: Transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic infiltrate in vessel.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Survival at One Year

    Time frame: One year

    Patient survival is defined as any participant who is known to be alive one year after the skin closure date. Participants who died or whose outcome was unknown at one year were considered to be non-survivors.

  2. Graft Survival at One Year

    Time frame: One year

    Graft survival defined as any participant who did not meet the criteria for graft loss, where graft loss is defined as any re-transplant, permanent return to dialysis (> 30 days), patient death, or participant whose outcome at one year was unknown.

    Participants were only counted once regardless of how many criteria were met.

  3. Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Confirmed Acute Rejection at 6 and 12 Months

    Time frame: Six months and 12 months

    Rejection episodes were confirmed by biopsy by the clinical site pathologist. Biopsies were graded according to the 1997 Banff criteria:

    Borderline: No intimal arteritis present but foci of mild tubulitis; Grade I: Significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate to severe tubulitis; Grade II: Mild to severe intimal arteritis Grade III: Transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic infiltrate in vessel.

    Acute rejection is defined as a grade ≥ I.

  4. Time to First Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection Episode

    Time frame: one year

    Time to first biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episode defined as the number of days from skin closure (Day 0) to the date of biopsy. Rejection episodes were confirmed by biopsy by the clinical site pathologist and graded according to the 1997 Banff criteria:

    Borderline: No intimal arteritis present but foci of mild tubulitis; Grade I: Significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate to severe tubulitis; Grade II: Mild to severe intimal arteritis Grade III: Transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic infiltrate in vessel.

    Acute rejection is defined as a grade ≥ I.

  5. Number of Participants Requiring Anti-lymphocyte Antibody Therapy for Treatment of Rejection

    Time frame: one year

    Rejection episodes were confirmed by biopsy by the clinical site pathologist. Participants with histologically-proven Banff Grade II or III rejection or participants with steroid-resistant rejection were treated with anti-lymphocyte antibody treatment according to institutional practice.

    Biopsies were graded according to the 1997 Banff criteria:

    Borderline: No intimal arteritis present but foci of mild tubulitis; Grade I: Significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate to severe tubulitis; Grade II: Mild to severe intimal arteritis Grade III: Transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic infiltrate in vessel.

  6. Severity of Acute Rejection

    Time frame: one year

    Rejection episodes were confirmed by biopsy by the clinical site pathologist. Biopsies were graded according to the 1997 Banff criteria:

    Borderline: No intimal arteritis present but foci of mild tubulitis; Grade IA: Significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate tubulitis; Grade IB: Significant interstitial infiltration and foci of severe tubulitis; Grade IIA: Mild to moderate intimal arteritis in at least 1 arterial cross section Grade IIB: Severe intimal arteritis comprising >25% of the luminal area lost in at least 1 arterial cross section; Grade III: Transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic infiltrate in vessel.

  7. Number of Participants Experiencing Multiple Rejection Episodes

    Time frame: one year

    This analysis includes rejection episodes that were either confirmed by biopsy by the clinical site pathologist or were clinically treated.

  8. Number of Participants With Clinically Treated Acute Rejection Episodes

    Time frame: one year

    A clinically treated acute rejection episode was any biopsy-confirmed or suspected rejection episode that was treated with immunosuppressive therapy.

  9. Number of Participants With Treatment Failure

    Time frame: one year

    Treatment failure was defined as the discontinuation of randomized study drug for any reason. Participants who met the definition of treatment failure were to be followed throughout the 12-month treatment period.

  10. Number of Participants Who Crossed Over Due to Treatment Failure

    Time frame: one year

    Participants were allowed to cross over to an alternative primary immunosuppressive regimen (either to the tacrolimus or cyclosporine treatment arms) to address an adverse event which led to randomized study drug discontinuation or in the case of severe or refractory rejection. Crossover to the modified release tacrolimus treatment arm was not permitted.

  11. Change From Month 1 in Serum Creatinine at Month 6 and Month 12

    Time frame: Month 1, Month 6, and Month 12

    Renal function was assessed by the change from Month 1 in serum creatinine six months and 12 months after transplant.

  12. Change From Month 1 in Creatinine Clearance at Month 6 and Month 12

    Time frame: Month 1, Month 6, and Month 12

    Renal function was assessed by creatinine clearance, calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula.

  13. Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Patient Survival at the End of the Study

    Time frame: End of study (maximum time on study was 1,941 days).

    Patient survival was defined as any participant who was alive at the end of the study. Patient survival was censored at the time of last follow-up contact.

  14. Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Graft Survival at the End of the Study

    Time frame: End of study (maximum time on study was 1,941 days).

    Graft survival was defined as any participant who did not meet the definition of graft loss, where graft loss was any retransplant or the permanent return to dialysis (more than 30 days) or patient death.

    Graft survival was censored at the time of last follow-up contact.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Astellas Pharma Inc

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative, Multi-Center Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Prograf (Tacrolimus)/MMF, Modified Release (MR) Tacrolimus/MMF and Neoral (Cyclosporine)/MMF in de Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients

Important dates

Study start
2003
Primary completion
2005
Study completion
2009
First posted
Jul 14, 2003
Registry last updated
Dec 5, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.