Tacrolimus Modified Release (MR)
DrugThe target range for whole blood tacrolimus trough concentrations was 7 to 16 ng/mL for days 0 through 90, and 5 to 15 ng/mL thereafter.
Other names: Advagraf, FK506, FKMR, MR4, Astagraf XL
NCT Number: NCT00064701
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclosporine/MMF and tacrolimus modified release/MMF in de novo kidney transplant recipients.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me12 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Porto Alegre, Brazil
This was a 3 arm randomized, open-label, comparative, multi-center study in de novo kidney transplant recipients at 60 centers in the U.S., Canada and Brazil.
The study consisted of a 1-year post-transplant efficacy and safety study with a clinical continuation phase of a minimum of 2 years or until commercial availability of tacrolimus modified release, unless the Data Safety Monitoring Board or sponsor specified otherwise.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The target range for whole blood tacrolimus trough concentrations was 7 to 16 ng/mL for days 0 through 90, and 5 to 15 ng/mL thereafter.
Other names: Advagraf, FK506, FKMR, MR4, Astagraf XL
The target range for whole blood tacrolimus trough concentrations was the recommended trough concentration range for Prograf: 7 to 16 ng/mL for days 0 through 90 and 5 to 15 ng/mL thereafter.
Other names: Prograf, FK506
The target range for whole blood cyclosporine trough concentrations was 125 to 400 ng/mL for days 0 through 90, and 100 to 300 ng/mL thereafter.
Other names: Neoral, CsA
Oral
Other names: CellCept, MMF
Time frame: one year
Efficacy failure is defined as any participant who died, experienced a graft failure (permanent return to dialysis [> 30 days] or retransplant), had a biopsy-confirmed (Banff Grade ≥ I) acute rejection (BCAR), or was lost to follow-up.
Biopsies were graded according to the 1997 Banff criteria:
Borderline: No intimal arteritis present but foci of mild tubulitis; Grade I: Significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate to severe tubulitis; Grade II: Mild to severe intimal arteritis Grade III: Transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic infiltrate in vessel.
Time frame: One year
Patient survival is defined as any participant who is known to be alive one year after the skin closure date. Participants who died or whose outcome was unknown at one year were considered to be non-survivors.
Time frame: One year
Graft survival defined as any participant who did not meet the criteria for graft loss, where graft loss is defined as any re-transplant, permanent return to dialysis (> 30 days), patient death, or participant whose outcome at one year was unknown.
Participants were only counted once regardless of how many criteria were met.
Time frame: Six months and 12 months
Rejection episodes were confirmed by biopsy by the clinical site pathologist. Biopsies were graded according to the 1997 Banff criteria:
Borderline: No intimal arteritis present but foci of mild tubulitis; Grade I: Significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate to severe tubulitis; Grade II: Mild to severe intimal arteritis Grade III: Transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic infiltrate in vessel.
Acute rejection is defined as a grade ≥ I.
Time frame: one year
Time to first biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episode defined as the number of days from skin closure (Day 0) to the date of biopsy. Rejection episodes were confirmed by biopsy by the clinical site pathologist and graded according to the 1997 Banff criteria:
Borderline: No intimal arteritis present but foci of mild tubulitis; Grade I: Significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate to severe tubulitis; Grade II: Mild to severe intimal arteritis Grade III: Transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic infiltrate in vessel.
Acute rejection is defined as a grade ≥ I.
Time frame: one year
Rejection episodes were confirmed by biopsy by the clinical site pathologist. Participants with histologically-proven Banff Grade II or III rejection or participants with steroid-resistant rejection were treated with anti-lymphocyte antibody treatment according to institutional practice.
Biopsies were graded according to the 1997 Banff criteria:
Borderline: No intimal arteritis present but foci of mild tubulitis; Grade I: Significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate to severe tubulitis; Grade II: Mild to severe intimal arteritis Grade III: Transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic infiltrate in vessel.
Time frame: one year
Rejection episodes were confirmed by biopsy by the clinical site pathologist. Biopsies were graded according to the 1997 Banff criteria:
Borderline: No intimal arteritis present but foci of mild tubulitis; Grade IA: Significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate tubulitis; Grade IB: Significant interstitial infiltration and foci of severe tubulitis; Grade IIA: Mild to moderate intimal arteritis in at least 1 arterial cross section Grade IIB: Severe intimal arteritis comprising >25% of the luminal area lost in at least 1 arterial cross section; Grade III: Transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic infiltrate in vessel.
Time frame: one year
This analysis includes rejection episodes that were either confirmed by biopsy by the clinical site pathologist or were clinically treated.
Time frame: one year
A clinically treated acute rejection episode was any biopsy-confirmed or suspected rejection episode that was treated with immunosuppressive therapy.
Time frame: one year
Treatment failure was defined as the discontinuation of randomized study drug for any reason. Participants who met the definition of treatment failure were to be followed throughout the 12-month treatment period.
Time frame: one year
Participants were allowed to cross over to an alternative primary immunosuppressive regimen (either to the tacrolimus or cyclosporine treatment arms) to address an adverse event which led to randomized study drug discontinuation or in the case of severe or refractory rejection. Crossover to the modified release tacrolimus treatment arm was not permitted.
Time frame: Month 1, Month 6, and Month 12
Renal function was assessed by the change from Month 1 in serum creatinine six months and 12 months after transplant.
Time frame: Month 1, Month 6, and Month 12
Renal function was assessed by creatinine clearance, calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula.
Time frame: End of study (maximum time on study was 1,941 days).
Patient survival was defined as any participant who was alive at the end of the study. Patient survival was censored at the time of last follow-up contact.
Time frame: End of study (maximum time on study was 1,941 days).
Graft survival was defined as any participant who did not meet the definition of graft loss, where graft loss was any retransplant or the permanent return to dialysis (more than 30 days) or patient death.
Graft survival was censored at the time of last follow-up contact.
Astellas Pharma Inc
Industry
A Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative, Multi-Center Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Prograf (Tacrolimus)/MMF, Modified Release (MR) Tacrolimus/MMF and Neoral (Cyclosporine)/MMF in de Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02907554
Brain Death, Brain Diseases
Clermont-Ferrand, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07716878
Bacterial Infections and Mycoses, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT01294020
Heart Transplantation, Intestine Transplantation
Brussels, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT04506060
BK Virus Nephropathy, Kidney Transplantation
Amiens, France
View Trial Details