Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06836778

Comparative Study of Carvedilol Monotherapy Versus Combination Therapy With Endoscopic Variceal Ligation (EVL) for Primary Prophylaxis of Variceal Bleeding in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma With High-Risk Esophageal Varices

Esophageal varices are common in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with an incidence rate of 63% at the time of HCC diagnosis. Following an acute variceal bleed, the 6-week mortality rate for HCC patients is as high as 26%. Mortality rates escalate notably in HCC patients experiencing acute variceal bleeding, especially with increasing cancer severity indicated by BLCL status. Research suggests that the cumulative incidence rate of variceal bleeding at one year in patients receiving primary prophylaxis is almost half that of patients not receiving any prophylaxis.

Beta blockers are the standard therapy for primary prophylaxis in patients with portal hypertension to prevent variceal bleeding. Endoscopic band ligation has also shown promising results in recent studies. However, the combined impact of beta blockers and esophageal band ligation on lowering the incidence of variceal bleeding remains unstudied.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of carvedilol monotherapy versus combination therapy with carvedilol and endoscopic band ligation in patients with HCC for primary prophylaxis of high-risk esophageal varices.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences (ILBS)

New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110070, India

Location contact

Dr Sarthak Chanana, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

01146300000

About this study

Study population: All patients aged ≥ 18 years and ≤ 80 years admitted in Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi with HCC of any cause and high risk esophageal varices and are giving written consent for participation in the study.

Study design - Single center, Open label, Randomized controlled trial Study period - 6 months Intervention - The patients will be randomized into Group -A (NSBB arm) and Group-B (EVL + NSBB arm). Both the group will receive the remaining treatment as per protocol Group A: Non-selective beta blocker (Carvedilol 3.125 mg BD for 3 days followed by 6.25 mg BD , maximum dose would be 12.5 mg BD , same shall be switch to maximum tolerable dose if SBP< 90 , H,R<55) Group B: Non-selective beta blocker (Carvedilol 3.125 mg BD for 3 days followed by 6.25 mg BD , maximum dose would be 12.5 mg BD , same shall be switch to maximum tolerable dose if SBP< 90 , H,R<55) + EVL every 3 weeks till eradication of varices followed by every 3 months.

Monitoring and assessment: Monitoring and evaluation would be done once a month for first 3 months then at 6th month.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-80 years
  • Cirrhosis with HCC
  • High risk oesophageal varices (*large or small with RCS)
  • Valid consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Any contra-indication to beta-blockers
  • Any EVL or Sclerotherapy within last 3 months
  • Any past history of TIPS or surgery for portal hypertension
  • HCC with BCLC-D
  • Patients with past history of variceal bleed.
  • Patient With Liver transplant expected in next 2 weeks would be excluded

Treatment and study plan

Carvedilol Tablets

Drug

Non-selective beta blocker (Carvedilol 3.125 mg BD for 3 days followed by 6.25 mg BD , maximum dose would be 12.5 mg BD , same shall be switch to maximum tolerable dose if Systolic BP< 90 , H,R<55)

Endoscopic Variceal Ligation

Procedure

EVL every 3 weeks till eradication of varices followed by every 3 months.

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients of cirrhosis with HCC and high risk oesophageal varices on carvedilol developing variceal bleed with or without EVL in 6months follow up.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patient developing variceal bleed while on therapy with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors despite on carvedilol with or without EVL

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Proportion of patient developing variceal bleed while on therapy with immunotherapy despite on carvedilol with or without EVL.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Percentage of patient of cirrhosis with HCC and Portal Vein Tumoral Thrombosis developing variceal bleed while on carvedilol with or without EVL.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Proportion of patients having post-EVL ulcer bleed after endoscopic variceal ligation.

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Proportion of patients with change in non invasive test for portal hypertension in both groups.

    Time frame: 6 months

    Non invasive markers: LSM, SSM, APRI Score, ALBI Score

  6. Proportion of patient developing variceal bleed after SBRT for advanced Hepatocellular carcinoma

    Time frame: 6 months

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Dr Ashok Chaoudhury, DM

CONTACT

[email protected]

01146300000

Dr Sarthak Chanana, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

01146300000

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparative Study of Carvedilol Monotherapy Versus Combination Therapy With Endoscopic Variceal Ligation (EVL) for Primary Prophylaxis of Variceal Bleeding in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma With High-Risk Esophageal Varices: A Randomized Trial

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Feb 20, 2025
Registry last updated
Feb 20, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.