Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02498795

Comparative Research Among 3 Action Protocol in Other to Approach Chronic Patellar Tendinopathy

The accomplishment of a treatment with Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis of additional form to the accomplishment of eccentric exercise's program in patients with chronic patellar tendinopathy is more effective than the accomplishment of an additional treatment with dry needling or eccentric exercise's program realized of isolated form.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–40 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Universidad San Jorge

Villanueva de Gállego, Zaragoza, 50830, Spain

About this study

Experimental study randomized with double blind, whose purpose is to compare three protocols in those who apply different protocols of physical therapy to themselves in three groups of intervention with patients with chronic patellar tendinopathy.

There take part in this study young women of both sexes, of Zaragoza and of different sports clubs of entity 18 and 40 years, that they realize of habitual form (minimum 3 times a week) a sport. All of them present chronic patellar tendinopathy.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age understood between 18 and 40 years.
  • To practise any sport of habitual form.
  • Patients diagnosed of chronic patellar tendinopathy with a minimum of 3 months of evolution and with stable symptomatology.
  • Pain to the palpation of the tendon in the low pole of the knee and during the training or competition.
  • Punctuation of the questionnaire VISA-P under 80.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient had an operation on the knee affected in the last 6 months.
  • Infiltrations in the knee affected in the last 3 months.
  • Patient who has received pharmacological treatment or physical therapy in the last 48 hours.
  • Pathology with less than 3 months of evolution.
  • To present bilateral chronic tendinopathy.
  • Punctuation of the questionnaire major or equal Visa - p of 80.
  • Inability to apply someone of the techniques of treatment or valuation for absolute or relative contraindication.

Treatment and study plan

Group of Dry Needling

Other

Every group will receive a total of 4 treatment distributed throughout 8 weeks of treatment. The program of eccentric exercises that will have to realize it in his domicile every day.

Group of Electrolysis

Other

Every group will receive a total of 4 treatment distributed throughout 8 weeks of treatment. The program of eccentric exercises that will have to realize it in his domicile every day.

Control Group

Other

Every group will receive a total of 4 treatment distributed throughout 8 weeks of treatment. The program of eccentric exercises that will have to realize it in his domicile every day.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in functionality at 8 weeks as measured by Visa-p

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    This scale consists of eight questions, the first six questions of which employ an analogical visual scale in order to assign a score of 0 to 10, where 10 represents the optimum state, for the purpose of quantifying pain and function in different activities, whereas the last two questions assess the level of functionality and ability to perform physical activity.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain, as measured by Visual Analog Scale

    Time frame: 0, 8 and 20 weeks

    Participants will be explained that a score of 0 indicates the absence of pain whereas a score of 10 represents the maximum tolerable pain

  2. Quality of life by SF-36

    Time frame: 0, 8 and 20 weeks

    Health Survey

  3. Thickness of the tendon, as measured by ultrasound scan

    Time frame: 0, 8 and 20 weeks

    Tendon structure

  4. Height of the jump

    Time frame: 0, 8 and 20 weeks

    Jump test with a force platform

  5. Concentric force of the low members

    Time frame: 0, 8 and 20 weeks

    Jump test with a force platform

  6. Speed of the jump

    Time frame: 0, 8 and 20 weeks

    Jump test with a force platform

  7. Hypervascularity, as measured by ultrasound scan

    Time frame: 0, 8 and 20 weeks

    Tendon structure

  8. Functionality, as measured by Visa-p

    Time frame: 0 and 20 weeks

    This scale consists of eight questions, the first six questions of which employ an analogical visual scale in order to assign a score of 0 to 10, where 10 represents the optimum state, for the purpose of quantifying pain and function in different activities, whereas the last two questions assess the level of functionality and ability to perform physical activity.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Universidad de Zaragoza

Other

Collaborators

  • Universidad San Jorge

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2020
First posted
Jul 15, 2015
Registry last updated
Dec 4, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.