Dhala Medical College
Dhaka, Bangladesh
NCT Number: NCT07189923
Road traffic accidents (RTAs) remain a major public health concern worldwide and in Bangladesh, contributing significantly to injury, disability, and premature death. In resource limited settings like Bangladesh, it is crucial to understand the factors that influence survival following an RTA in order to develop effective prevention strategies and improve patient outcomes. Therefore, this study aims to determine the 30 day survival rate and identify predictors of survival among adult RTA victims treated at a tertiary care hospital in Bangladesh. The observational study will be carried out at Emergency and casualty department of Dhaka Medical College Hospital (DMCH) between October 2025 and March 2026. A total of 204 adults (≥18 years) presenting to the hospital's Casualty Department with RTA related injuries will be included. Informed written consent will be obtained from each patient or their legal guardian prior to enrollment. Data will be collected through structured face to face interviews, review of hospital records, and follow up on the 30th day of accident. The follow-up will be conducted either in person or by telephone. Variables will include patient demographics, accident circumstances, admission characteristics, injury pattern and severity, pre-hospital care, clinical condition at admission, hospital management provided, and treatment outcome. All data will be analyzed using SPSS version 25.0. Kaplan-Meier analysis will estimate survival probabilities, while Cox proportional hazards regression will be used to identify independent predictors of mortality. The findings of this study are expected to generate context-specific, evidence-based insights for strengthening trauma care protocols, gap related to emergency handling of the RTA patients, enhancing pre-hospital emergency services, and informing policy decisions aimed at reducing preventable RTA-related mortality and morbidity in Bangladesh.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Dhaka, Bangladesh
Study Rationale:
Acne scars, notably atrophic scars, pose significant cosmetic and psychological concerns. Standard treatments include fractional lasers and microneedling-based interventions; however, rigorous comparative data in real-world clinical settings remain scarce. Recent evidence suggests ablative fractional CO2 laser and PRP-enhanced microneedling offer notable benefits. This split-face design allows direct comparison of efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction between the modalities among Bangladeshi patients.
Study Design:
Type: Phase 3, open-label, randomized, split-face, comparative clinical trial
Planned Sample Size: 116 participants
Setting: Department of Dermatology, Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh
Duration: April 2025 to March 2026
Randomization: Side of face assigned to either intervention via coin toss
Blinding: Open-label; outcome assessment by independent dermatologist blinded to intervention side
Eligibility Criteria:
Inclusion:
Age >18 years
Both sexes
Grade 2-4 acne scarring (Goodman & Baron qualitative grading)
Equal baseline scar grades on both facial halves
Atrophic scars only (no active acne)
Exclusion:
History of keloidal tendency
Bleeding or platelet disorders
Major surgery in past 6 months
Active facial infection (e.g., herpes, folliculitis)
HIV, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), or chronic illness
Pregnancy
Interventions:
Ablative Fractional CO2 Laser:
Pre-treatment: 2.5% lidocaine + 2.5% prilocaine cream (45 minutes), antiseptic cleansing
Device: SmartXide DOT Fractionated CO2 Laser (15 W, 800 μm spacing, 600 µs dwell, stack 2)
Three sessions, one month apart
PRP with Microneedling:
Pre-treatment: 2.5% lidocaine + 2.5% prilocaine cream (2 hours), antiseptic cleansing
PRP Preparation: 8 mL blood with double spin centrifugation to yield 2 mL PRP, platelet count verified
Intradermal PRP injection (nappage technique), followed by dermapen microneedling (1.5 mm depth, 12-needle cartridge, 4-directional passes)
Three sessions, one month apart
Follow-up and Data Collection:
Baseline, day 30, day 60, final (day 90 post first session)
Outcome measures collected via clinical assessments, standardized photographs, patient questionnaires, and independent dermatologist review
Adverse events monitored throughout
Outcome Measures:
Primary:
Change in Goodman & Baron quantitative and qualitative acne scar grades at 90 days
Secondary:
Independent dermatologist evaluation (10-point VAS, categorized for analysis)
Patient satisfaction (5-point Likert scale)
Frequency and type of adverse events/side effects
Subgroup analyses by scar severity, skin type, and sex
Statistical Analysis:
All analyses by intention-to-treat
Continuous data: Paired t-tests (within-group), independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U (between modalities)
Qualitative grades: McNemar's test (within-group), chi-square (between modalities)
Categorical responses (dermatologist VAS, satisfaction, side effects): chi-square or Fisher exact
95% confidence intervals, significance level 0.05
Safety Monitoring:
Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) of independent experts
GCP compliance and interim reviews
Adverse event reporting follows national and institutional guidelines
Ethical Considerations:
Written informed consent (Bengali/English)
Withdrawal permitted at any time without detriment to care
Confidential data handling in accordance with local regulations
Institutional ethics committee approval obtained
Keywords:
Acne scars, fractional CO2 laser, platelet-rich plasma, microneedling, randomized trial, Bangladesh, split-face, dermatology, Goodman and Baron, patient satisfaction, safety
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants will receive ablative fractional CO₂ laser therapy on one side of the face using the SmartXide DOT Fractionated CO₂ Laser system. Treatment parameters: 15 W power, 800 µm spacing, 600 µs dwell time, stack level 2. Sessions: 3, each one month apart.
Participants will receive intradermal autologous PRP injections prepared by double-spin centrifugation from 8 mL of venous blood, followed by microneedling with a Dermapen (12-needle cartridge, 1.5 mm depth). Endpoint: pinpoint bleeding. Sessions: 3, each one month apart.
Time frame: Day 30 (prior to Session 2), Day 60 (prior to Session 3), and at the final follow-up visit on Day 150
Improvement in acne scars will be assessed using the Goodman and Baron quantitative global acne scarring grading system and qualitative global acne scarring grading system.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Mohammad Jahid Hasan, MBBS, MPH
CONTACT
Tamanna Tabassum, MBBS, MPH
CONTACT
Dr. Sirajul Islam Medical College
Other
Efficacy and Safety of Ablative Fractional CO2 Laser and Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) With Microneedling for Treatment of Acne Scars: a Real-world Comparative Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07620769
Acne Scar, Acne Scarring
Chengdu, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07094958
Acne Scars, Acne Scars - Atrophic
View Trial DetailsNCT01696513
Acne Scars
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02216864
Acne Scars
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details