Hacettepe University
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT06375837
The clinical performance of an an alkasite-based restorative material and two different resin composites will be evaluated and compared in non-carious cervical lesions. After recruiting participants with at least three non-carious cervical lesions, all restorations will be placed by a single clinician. Lesions will be divided in three groups: an alkasite-based restorative material (Cention N, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein (CN)), hybrid resin composite (Gradia Direct Anterior, GC, Tokyo, Japan (GD)) and a highly filled flowable resin composite ((G-aenial Universal Flo, GC, Tokyo, Japan (GF)). All restorative procedures will be conducted according to manufacturers' instructions. Restorations will be scored using FDI criteria. Descriptive statistics will be performed using chi-square tests.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Cention N
Gradia Direct Anterior
G-aenial Universal Flo
Time frame: two years
Two year results according to FDI criteria. (Esthetic properties) The evaluations will be carried out using FDI criteria. Esthetic properties will be examined. Five scores will be given for each restoration: (1) Clinically excellent / very good, (2) Clinically good, (3) Clinically sufficient/satisfactory, (4) Clinically unsatisfactory, (5) Clinically poor.The data obtained for groups will be compared at each visit.
Time frame: two years
Two year results according to FDI criteria. (Functional properties) The evaluations will be carried out using FDI criteria. Functional properties will be examined.Five scores will be given for each restoration: (1) Clinically excellent / very good, (2) Clinically good, (3) Clinically sufficient/satisfactory, (4) Clinically unsatisfactory, (5) Clinically poor.The data obtained for groups will be compared at each visit.
Time frame: two years
Two year results according to FDI criteria. (Biological properties) The evaluations will be carried out using FDI criteria. Biological properties will be examined.Five scores will be given for each restoration: (1) Clinically excellent / very good, (2) Clinically good, (3) Clinically sufficient/satisfactory, (4) Clinically unsatisfactory, (5) Clinically poor.The data obtained for groups will be compared at each visit.
Hacettepe University
Other
Comparative Evaluation of an Alkasite-based Restorative Material and Two Different Resin Composites in Non-carious Cervical Lesions
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04324008
Bites and Stings, Chemically-Induced Disorders
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT03415412
Stomatognathic Diseases, Tooth Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT01805869
Disease, Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06348953
Caries; Dentin, Deep Caries
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial Details