Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06303141

Comparative Effects of Neuromuscular Training and Mobilization With Movement in Professional Athletes With Ankle Sprain

The study aims to compare the effects of neuromuscular training and mobilization with movement on pain, range of motion, function, and disability in professional athletes with ankle sprain. Neuromuscular training focuses on improving neuromuscular control and stability, while mobilization with movement aims to restore joint mobility and function. By investigating the outcomes of these two interventions, the study seeks to provide insights into their effectiveness for managing ankle sprains in professional athletes.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–30 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Pakistan Sports Board

Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan

About this study

The comparative study on the effects of neuromuscular training and mobilization with movement on pain, range of motion, function, and disability in professional athletes with ankle sprain is designed to address the efficacy of these two interventions in managing ankle injuries among athletes. An ankle sprain is a common injury in sports, often resulting in pain, limited range of motion, functional impairment, and disability. Therefore, identifying the most effective treatment approaches is essential for promoting athletes' recovery and minimizing the impact of ankle sprains on their performance.

Neuromuscular training is a structured exercise program aimed at improving neuromuscular control, proprioception, balance, and strength around the ankle joint. It typically involves exercises targeting the muscles and ligaments involved in ankle stability, such as balance training, proprioceptive exercises, strength training, and functional rehabilitation exercises. The goal of neuromuscular training is to enhance joint stability, reduce the risk of re-injury, and improve functional outcomes in athletes with ankle sprains.

On the other hand, mobilization with movement is a manual therapy technique used to restore joint mobility and function through specific movements or mobilizations. This approach involves applying controlled and graded movements to the affected ankle joint while simultaneously mobilizing the surrounding soft tissues. Mobilization with movement aims to reduce pain, improve joint mobility, and restore normal movement patterns by addressing restrictions in joint mobility, muscle tightness, and soft tissue adhesions.

The comparative study will involve professional athletes who have sustained ankle sprains during sports participation. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the neuromuscular training group or the mobilization with movement group. Both groups will undergo a structured intervention program tailored to their respective treatment approach.

The neuromuscular training program will consist of a series of progressive exercises targeting ankle stability, balance, strength, and proprioception. These exercises may include single-leg balance exercises, resistance training using bands or weights, agility drills, plyometric exercises, and functional activities relevant to the athlete's sport.

Meanwhile, the mobilization with movement intervention will involve manual therapy techniques administered by a qualified physiotherapist or sports therapist. These techniques may include joint mobilizations, soft tissue mobilizations, and specific movement patterns designed to restore normal joint mechanics and improve ankle function.

Outcome measures will include pain levels, range of motion (assessed using goniometry), functional status (evaluated using standardized outcome measures such as the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure), and disability scores (measured using validated scales such as the Disability Rating Index). These measures will be assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and follow-up time points to evaluate the effectiveness of each intervention in improving ankle sprain outcomes.

The study's findings will provide valuable insights into the comparative effectiveness of neuromuscular training and mobilization with movement in professional athletes with ankle sprains. By identifying the most beneficial treatment approach, the study aims to optimize rehabilitation strategies for ankle injuries in athletes, ultimately supporting their return to sport and minimizing the risk of re-injury.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • • Athletes will be included:
  • Rackets player,
  • Basketball players
  • Runners
  • Foot-ballers players
  • Soccer players,
  • and Volley-ball players
  • Gender: both male and female
  • Age: 18 to 35 years old
  • Training: 15-20/ week
  • Sustained an ankle sprain grade II and III
  • With no Functional Ankle Instability (Greek version of the Identification functional ankle instability questionnaire IdFAI, score < 10) will be used in order to identify athletes with FAI

Exclusion criteria

  • • Any vestibular or balance disorders (1)
  • History of surgery and trauma of a lower limb since last 6 months
  • Athletes with pain related to calf muscles and achillies tendon
  • Co-morbidities: Diabetes, Hypertension, etc

Treatment and study plan

Closed chain exercises

Other

Open eyes and closed eyes across arm" (3 sets x 60 sec) Lateral step down (3 sets x 6-12 reps) Semi-Squat Exercise (3sets x 6-12 reps) Thera-band isometric (3 sets x 10 -15sec each)

Neuromuscular Training

Other

Neuromuscular Training Exercise:

  • Single Leg Raise (3 sec x 30sec each)
  • Ankle eversion/inversion (3 sets x 25 reps)
  • Double Hopping in place then out of place (3 sets 30 sec)
  • Reach with feet (3 sets x 30-60 sec each)
  • Reach with hands (3 sets x 30-60 sec each)
  • Wobble board Exercise (3sets x 30-60sec each

mobilization with movement

Other

Joint mobilization with movement (by Mulligan) refers to manual therapy techniques that are used to modulate pain and treat joint dysfunctions that limit the range of motion (ROM).

(3 sets x 6 oscillation/glide each)

Primary outcomes

  1. Numerical Pain Rating Scale for Pain

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    The Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is a subjective measure in which individuals rate their pain on an elevenpoint numerical scale. The scale is composed of 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

  2. Goniometer for Range of Motion

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    A goniometer is a device that measures an angle or permits the rotation of an object to a definite position

  3. Star balance excursion test for Balance

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    The Star Excursion Balance Test is a reliable measure and a valid dynamic test to predict risk of lower extremity injury, to identify dynamic balance deficits in patients with lower extremity conditions, and to be responsive to training programs in healthy participants and those with lower extremity conditions.

  4. Foot and ankle ability Measure for Functional Performance

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    The FAAM is a self-report measure that assesses physical function of individuals with lower leg, foot, and ankle musculoskeletal disorders. 2) Sports subscale of 8 items. For each subscale patients are asked to answer each question with a single response that most clearly describes their condition within the past week.

  5. Cumberland Ankle Instability

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) is a self-report questionnaire used to assess the severity of chronic ankle instability (CAI). It consists of nine items designed to evaluate functional ankle instability, including symptoms of giving way, recurrent sprains, and perceived ankle function during daily activities. Each item is scored on a 0 to 30 scale, with higher scores indicating better ankle stability

Secondary outcomes

  1. Agility T-test

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    The Agility T-Test is a widely used physical performance test designed to assess an individual's agility, speed, and quickness. It involves a series of directional changes and sprints around cones or markers arranged in a T-shape. The test measures the time taken by the individual to complete the course accurately. It requires rapid acceleration, deceleration, and changes of direction in multiple planes of movement, making it a comprehensive assessment of agility and dynamic balance. The Agility T-Test is commonly used in sports performance testing, fitness evaluations, and rehabilitation settings to assess an individual's agility and athletic ability.

  2. Speed (20m sprint test)

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    The 20-meter sprint test is a commonly used measure of an individual's speed and acceleration. In this test, the participant is required to sprint as fast as possible over a distance of 20 meters from a standing start. The time taken to complete the sprint is recorded using timing gates or a stopwatch, providing a measure of the participant's sprinting speed.

    The 20-meter sprint test is often used in sports performance assessments, fitness testing, and research studies to evaluate an individual's anaerobic power and speed capabilities. It is particularly relevant for athletes competing in sports that require short bursts of maximal effort, such as sprinting, soccer, basketball, and rugby

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparative Effects of Neuromuscular Training and Mobilization With Movement on Pain, Range of Motion, Function and Disability in Professional Athletes With Ankle Sprain

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Mar 12, 2024
Registry last updated
Mar 12, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.