Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02977299

Comparative Effectiveness Research Trial for Antidepressant Incomplete and Non-responders With TRD

This is a multi-site, randomized, open-label, effectiveness trial comparing three treatment arms for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) patients with TRD who are currently on ongoing, stable and adequate antidepressant therapy (ADT). Adequate ADT is defined as a therapeutically sufficient dose for a sufficient treatment period, which would be expected to be effective as listed in the MGH Antidepressant Treatment Response Questionnaire (ATRQ). Patients will be randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to one of three open-label treatment arms: a) aripiprazole augmentation, b) rTMS augmentation, and c) switching to venlafaxine XR or Duloxetine.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • women and men ages 18-80,
  • with MDD, of at least 12 weeks duration, according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria confirmed by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI; Sheehan et al, 1998),
  • have a Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS - Montgomery and Asberg, 1979) score of at least 20 at screen and baseline as assessed by site clinicians,
  • meet criteria for TRD during the current major depressive episode documented in the MGH Antidepressant Treatment History Questionnaire (ATRQ) (Chandler et al., 2010), which will be defined as being non-responders (less than 50% of symptom improvement) to two or more depression treatment trials of adequate dose and duration as defined by the MGH ATRQ,
  • are currently on an antidepressant of adequate dose (as defined by the MGH ATRQ) and duration (at least 8 weeks), with the antidepressant dose being stable over the past four weeks, and with documented (in the MGH ATRQ) non-response (less than 50% improvement) to the current antidepressant.
  • Patients who have passed the MGH CTNI remote assessment, with documentation provided to sites by MGH CTNI.

Exclusion criteria

  • pregnant or breastfeeding women, women of childbearing potential who are not using an accepted means of birth control, or women with a positive urine pregnancy test,
  • patients who have received treatment with rTMS, aripiprazole, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), or venlafaxine during the current episode,
  • patients who express an objection to receiving treatment with at least one of the three treatment arms of our study,
  • patients with any history of bipolar disorder or psychosis (diagnosed by MINI),
  • patients with active alcohol or substance abuse disorders within the past 6 months (diagnosed by MINI),
  • patients with suicidal ideation of the degree that, in the opinion of the evaluating clinician, participation in the study would place them at significantly increased risk of suicide,
  • patients with unstable medical issues of such degree that, in the opinion of the evaluating clinician, participation in the study would place them at significant risk of a serious adverse event, or patients with a screening hemoglobin A1c level greater than 7.5%, or patients with epilepsy, dementia, Parkinson's disease, or Huntington's Disease,
  • patients who have received treatment with vagus nerve stimulation (VNS),
  • patients who have not responded to more than five FDA-approved antidepressant treatment trials of adequate dose and duration during the current episode, or who did not respond to ECT in previous episodes
  • patients on excluded medications,
  • patients with a positive urine screen drug test for a substance for which they do not have a valid prescription for a valid medical reason,
  • patients with currently abnormal thyroid function tests,
  • patients who have received at least one dose of a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) four weeks or less prior, and
  • for patients on concomitant psychotropic agents (anticonvulsants, benzodiazepines, hypnotics, opiates, triiodothyronine (T3), modafinil, psychostimulants, buspirone, melatonin, omega-3 fatty acids, folate, l-methylfolate, s-adenosyl methionine, lithium) not on the same dose for at least four weeks prior to study entry or who do not agree to continue at the same dose during the acute phase of the study.
  • Patients who do not meet safety criteria for TMS: history of seizures, cardiac pacemaker, DBS or VNS, brain aneurism clips or other metallic implants in the intracranial space.
  • Also excluded is an individual who has received any administration of ketamine in the current episode for the treatment of depression.

Treatment and study plan

Aripiprazole

Drug

Oral adjunctive therapy with aripiprazole, dose adjusted for effectiveness and tolerability.

Other names: Abilify

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

Device

Adjunctive therapy with transcranial magnetic stimulation, dose adjusted for effectiveness and tolerability.

venlafaxine XR

Drug

Oral switch therapy with venlafaxine, dose adjusted for effectiveness and tolerability.

Other names: Effexor XR

Primary outcomes

  1. Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a clinician-rated scale that assesses the severity of depressive symptoms. The scale consists of 10 items evaluating apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. Each item is scored from 0 to 6. Item scores are summed to calculate a total MADRS score ranging from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms and a worse outcome.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of Life, Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF)

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) is a self-reported assessment tool used to evaluate an individual's degree of enjoyment and satisfaction across various areas of daily functioning. The questionnaire assesses domains such as physical health, mood, work, household activities, social relationships, leisure activities, and overall well-being. The short form consists of 16 items, with respondents rating their level of satisfaction and functioning over the past week. The first 14 items are summed to generate a total raw score ranging from 14 to 70, with higher scores indicating greater life satisfaction and better quality of life. Raw scores may also be converted to a percentage of the maximum possible score, ranging from 0% to 100%, to facilitate interpretation and comparison across studies. The final two items assess overall medication satisfaction and overall life satisfaction and are typically analyzed separately rather than included

Other outcomes

  1. Massachusetts General Hospital Cognitive and Physical Symptoms Questionnaire (MGH CPFQ)

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    The Massachusetts General Hospital Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (MGH CPFQ) is a self-reported assessment tool designed to evaluate cognitive and physical symptoms commonly associated with depression and its treatment. The questionnaire assesses areas such as motivation, wakefulness, energy, focus, memory, mental sharpness, and physical well-being. The instrument consists of 7 items, each rated on a 6-point scale from 1 (greater than normal functioning) to 6 (totally absent or severe impairment). Item scores are summed to generate a total score ranging from 7 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater impairment in cognitive and physical functioning. The MGH CPFQ is widely used in clinical research to assess functional deficits associated with depression and to monitor changes in cognitive and physical symptoms during treatment.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Registry information

Official study title

Augmentation Versus Switch: Comparative Effectiveness Research Trial for Antidepressant Incomplete and Non-responders With Treatment Resistant Depression (ASCERTAIN-TRD)

Acronym: ASCERTAINTRD

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Nov 30, 2016
Registry last updated
Jul 9, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.