NCT Number: NCT01875315
Comparative Effectiveness of Stress Tests
The primary objective of this project is to demonstrate that a new approach to cardiac stress imaging that combines treadmill exercise with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) provides valuable clinical information in a cost-effective manner.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Primary location
Brigham And Womens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- any patient referred for stress SPECT
- known or suspected ischemic heart disease
- ability to perform adequate treadmill stress
Exclusion criteria
- any contraindication to MRI (e.g. ferromagnetic foreign body, cerebral aneurysm clip, pacemaker/ICD, severe claustrophobia)
- renal insufficiency (GFR < 40)
- known allergy to gadolinium-based contrast or iodinated contrast (because of the research CTA in patients not referred for cath after 2 weeks)
Treatment and study plan
Primary outcomes
-
Total patient direct and indirect medical costs for one year following stress testing will be less for patients undergoing stress CMR as compared to patients undergoing stress Nuclear.
Time frame: baseline
Patients will undergo either Stress CMR or stress Nuclear testing. For each individual patient, the cost of the initial test, the subsequent follow-up costs, and the total costs over the follow-up period will be calculated. Total costs will be collected for direct medical, direct non-medical and indirect costs. Direct medical costs will include those applied for medications, imaging, invasive therapies and healthcare services; as well as costs resulting from side effects or complications from each of the testing strategies. Direct non-medical costs will include those incurred due to CAD-related illness or the need to seek care, such as caregiver costs and patient transportation costs. Indirect costs, will be defined as lost productivity due to time lost from work, early death or disability.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Ohio State University
Other
Registry information
Official study title
EXACT-COST: Exercise CMR's Accuracy for Cardiovascular Stress Testing-Comparative Effectiveness of Stress Tests
Acronym: EXACT-COST
Important dates
- Study start
- 2012
- Primary completion
- 2017
- Study completion
- 2017
- First posted
- Jun 11, 2013
- Registry last updated
- Aug 28, 2019
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
CES1 Carriers in the PAPI Study
NCT03188705
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsImpact of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Patient Outcomes
NCT07468955
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Kütahya, Center, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsA Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Reduction Intervention for Native American Men
NCT06029517
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Buffalo, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsSafety and Effectiveness of Agent Paclitaxel-Coated PTCA Balloon Catheter. (AGENT Japan SV)
NCT04058990
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
View Trial Details