Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02646176

Comparative Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Interventions for Traumatic Brain Injury

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is increasingly recognized as a significant public health issue, but the most effective rehabilitation methods have yet to be identified. The Institute of Medicine and the Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research sponsored systematic reviews of evidence for comparative effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions for TBI. Both reviews concluded that substantially more research is needed to identify interventions best suited for different individuals. The practice-based evidence (PBE) approach employed to create the data used in the proposed study was a research method recommended to provide greater clarity, along with use of patient-centered outcomes obtained over a longer period of time than used in previous studies.

The following specific aims will be addressed in the proposed study:

1. Determine the comparative effectiveness of different therapeutic approaches used in inpatient TBI rehabilitation after statistically adjusting for patient need and ability to benefit from various approaches.

Investigators hypothesize:

1.1. Patients who receive a greater proportion of therapy time in Advanced Training (versus Standard of Care) will achieve better outcomes than similar patients who receive a lesser proportion of treatment time in Advanced Training.

1.2. Patients with the greatest initial levels of disability will experience larger effects from Advanced Training therapeutic approaches in comparison to the effects experienced by patients with less disability at admission.

1.3. Patients who receive a greater proportion of therapy in contextualized treatment (versus decontextualized) will achieve better outcomes than similar patients who receive a lesser proportion of time in contextualized treatment. 2. Determine the comparative effectiveness of difference in the delivery of inpatient rehabilitation therapies, after statistically adjusting for patient need and ability to benefit.

Investigators hypothesize:

2.1 The level of effort that patients are able to apply in treatment moderates the effectiveness of time in treatment.

2.2 Family involvement in treatment is associated with better outcomes.

Data will be drawn from the database established for the TBI Practice-Based Evidence Study (TBI-PBE Study). Data on 2130 persons who received inpatient TBI rehabilitation at any of 10 sites (9 in US, 1 in Canada) were obtained for the study. Detailed longitudinal data were collected prospectively on rehabilitation therapies (with point of care data completed for every clinical encounter), course of recovery, person and injury characteristics and outcomes during and after rehabilitation. Advanced analytic methods (e.g. propensity scores, generalized linear mixed models) will be used to compare the effects of different rehabilitation interventions on outcomes at discharge and during the 9 months following rehabilitation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

14 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Sustained a TBI, defined as damage to brain tissue caused by external force and evidenced by loss of consciousness, post-traumatic amnesia, skull fracture, or objective neurological findings
  • Diagnosed with an International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9-CM) code consistent with the CDC Guidelines for Surveillance of Central Nervous System Injury
  • Receiving inpatient care on a designated brain injury rehabilitation unit of one of the participating rehabilitation facilities
  • Incurred a TBI severe enough to warrant inpatient rehabilitation regardless of other injuries, with TBI being the predominant reason for rehabilitation admission

Exclusion criteria

  • None

Treatment and study plan

Inpatient rehabilitation

Behavioral

Inpatient rehabilitation includes activities and interventions provided by occupational, physical, therapeutic recreation and speech therapists, and psychologists.

Primary outcomes

  1. Participation

    Time frame: 9 months post-discharge from inpatient rehabilitation

    Participation as measured by the Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective

  2. Participation

    Time frame: 3 months post-discharge from inpatient rehabilitation

    Participation as measured by the Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective

Secondary outcomes

  1. Functional independence-Cognitive

    Time frame: Upon completion of inpatient rehabilitation (discharge score), an average of 1 month

    FIM-TM Cognitive scales will be used to measure functional independence in the cognitive realm.

  2. Functional independence-Cognitive

    Time frame: 3 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation

    FIM-TM Cognitive scales will be used to measure functional independence in the cognitive realm.

  3. Functional independence-Cognitive

    Time frame: 9 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation

    FIM-TM Cognitive scales will be used to measure functional independence in the cognitive realm.

  4. Functional independence-Motor

    Time frame: Upon completion of inpatient rehabilitation (discharge score), an average of 1 month

    FIM-TM Motor scales will be used to measure functional independence in the cognitive realm.

  5. Functional independence-Motor

    Time frame: 3 months post-discharge from inpatient rehabilitation

    FIM-TM Motor scales will be used to measure functional independence in the cognitive realm.

  6. Functional independence-Motor

    Time frame: 9 months post-discharge from inpatient rehabilitation

    FIM-TM Motor scales will be used to measure functional independence in the cognitive realm.

  7. Depressive symptoms

    Time frame: 3 months post-discharge from inpatient rehabilitation

    The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 will be used to measure depressive symptoms.

  8. Depressive symptoms

    Time frame: 9 months post-discharge from inpatient rehabilitation

    The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 will be used to measure depressive symptoms.

  9. Life satisfaction

    Time frame: 3 months post-discharge from inpatient rehabilitation

    The Satisfaction with Life Scale will be used to measure life satisfaction

  10. Life satisfaction

    Time frame: 9 months post-discharge from inpatient rehabilitation

    The Satisfaction with Life Scale will be used to measure life satisfaction

  11. Participation

    Time frame: 3 months post-discharge

    Participation will be measured using the Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Jennifer Bogner, PhD, ABPP

Other

Collaborators

  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • University of Utah

Registry information

Acronym: TBI-CER

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Jan 5, 2016
Registry last updated
Oct 28, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.