University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52241, United States
NCT Number: NCT05456295
Carbon fiber custom dynamic orthoses (CDOs) consist of a proximal cuff that wraps around the leg just below the knee, a posterior carbon fiber strut that stores and returns energy during gait, and a carbon fiber foot plate that supports the foot and allows bending of the posterior strut. The proximal cuff is a primary interface between the patient and the CDO and may influence comfort, preference, limb mechanics and loading, and effective stiffness of the CDO. The important role of the proximal cuff has not been examined. The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of CDO proximal cuff design on patient reported outcomes, limb mechanics and loading, and CDO mechanical characteristics.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Iowa City, Iowa, 52241, United States
Traumatic lower limb injuries often result in poor functional outcomes with long-term negative effects. Carbon fiber custom dynamic orthoses (CDOs) can improve outcomes by reducing pain, supporting the limb, and transferring forces around the limb through the CDO. CDOs consist of a proximal cuff that wraps around the leg just below the knee, a posterior carbon fiber strut that stores and returns energy during gait, and a carbon fiber foot plate that supports the foot and allows bending of the posterior strut. The proximal cuff is a primary interface between the patient and the CDO and may influence comfort, preference, limb mechanics and loading, and effective stiffness of the CDO. Although CDOs are becoming more commonly prescribed following injury the evidence available to guide clinical practice remains limited. The important role of the proximal cuff has not been systematically examined.
The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of CDO proximal cuff design on patient reported outcomes, limb mechanics and loading, and CDO mechanical characteristics. Two groups of individuals will participate: individuals with post-traumatic osteoarthritis in the ankle and healthy individuals. Testing will occur without an orthosis and while wearing orthoses with four proximal cuff designs representative of currently available devices: 1) a rigid patellar tendon bearing (PTB) clamshell cuff secured using a mechanical ratcheting system, 2) a PTB shell with a fixed pivot point secured with Velcro, 3) a rigid clamshell cuff secured with Velcro, and 4) a semi-rigid cuff with a flexible outer layer secured with Velcro.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
PARTICIPANTS WITH PTOA:
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
HEALTHY ABLE-BODIED PARTICIPANTS:
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The carbon fiber custom dynamic orthosis will consist of a semi-rigid foot plate, a posterior carbon fiber strut, and a proximal cuff that wraps around the leg below the knee. The design of the proximal cuff will differ between CUFF-A, CUFF-B, CUFF-C, CUFF-D.
Other names: Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO)
Time frame: Baseline
Force data (N) collected from the total foot (100% of sensor), measured between the foot and orthosis during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the total foot (100% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk in each study condition.
Time frame: Baseline
Force data (N) collected from the total foot (distal 40% of sensor), measured between the foot and orthosis during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the total foot (distal 40% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk in each study condition.
Time frame: Baseline
Force data (N) collected from the total foot (middle 30% of sensor), measured between the foot and orthosis during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the total foot (middle 30% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk in each study condition.
Time frame: Baseline
Force data (N) collected from the total foot (proximal 30% of sensor), measured between the foot and orthosis during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the total foot (proximal 30% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk in each study condition.
Time frame: Baseline
Pain will be assessed using a standard 11-point numerical pain rating scale, in which 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable.
Time frame: Baseline
The Patient Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS) physical function Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) is a computerized assessment measuring physical function. It is scored using a T-score in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. In a given PROMIS domain, a T-score above 50 represents more of the measured variable than the population average.
Time frame: Baseline
The Patient Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS) pain interference Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) is a computerized assessment measuring pain interference. It is scored using a T-score in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. In a given PROMIS domain, a T-score above 50 represents more of the measured variable than the population average.
Time frame: Baseline
The participant will rank order their preference for their standard of care device (if applicable), NoCDO, CUFF-A, CUFF-B, CUFF-C, CUFF-D on a questionnaire.
Time frame: Baseline
Peak ankle dorsiflexion (degrees) during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Peak ankle moment (Nm/kg) during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Peak ankle power (W/kg) during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Comfort scores range from 0 = most uncomfortable to 10 = most comfortable.
Time frame: Baseline
Comfort scores range from 0 = least smooth to 10 = most smooth.
Time frame: Baseline
Timing of peak center of pressure velocity (percent stance) during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Magnitude of peak center of pressure velocity (m/s) during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Electromyography (EMG, % Maximum) of the tibialis anterior during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Electromyography (EMG, % Maximum) of the peroneus longus during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Electromyography (EMG, % Maximum) of the soleus during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Electromyography (EMG, % Maximum) of the medial gastrocnemius during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Semi-structured interviews will also be used to fully capture the patients' perspectives, experience, and opinions associated with the device options they experienced as part of the study.
University of Iowa
Other
Acronym: AFOCUFF
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06685094
Arm Injuries, Autonomy
Murcia, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT06068257
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Orlando, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06702423
Healthy
London, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT07223164
Healthy
Irvine, California, United States
View Trial Details