Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05456295

Comparative Effect of Carbon Fiber Orthosis Cuff Design on Preference, Comfort, and Mechanics

Carbon fiber custom dynamic orthoses (CDOs) consist of a proximal cuff that wraps around the leg just below the knee, a posterior carbon fiber strut that stores and returns energy during gait, and a carbon fiber foot plate that supports the foot and allows bending of the posterior strut. The proximal cuff is a primary interface between the patient and the CDO and may influence comfort, preference, limb mechanics and loading, and effective stiffness of the CDO. The important role of the proximal cuff has not been examined. The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of CDO proximal cuff design on patient reported outcomes, limb mechanics and loading, and CDO mechanical characteristics.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Iowa

Iowa City, Iowa, 52241, United States

About this study

Traumatic lower limb injuries often result in poor functional outcomes with long-term negative effects. Carbon fiber custom dynamic orthoses (CDOs) can improve outcomes by reducing pain, supporting the limb, and transferring forces around the limb through the CDO. CDOs consist of a proximal cuff that wraps around the leg just below the knee, a posterior carbon fiber strut that stores and returns energy during gait, and a carbon fiber foot plate that supports the foot and allows bending of the posterior strut. The proximal cuff is a primary interface between the patient and the CDO and may influence comfort, preference, limb mechanics and loading, and effective stiffness of the CDO. Although CDOs are becoming more commonly prescribed following injury the evidence available to guide clinical practice remains limited. The important role of the proximal cuff has not been systematically examined.

The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of CDO proximal cuff design on patient reported outcomes, limb mechanics and loading, and CDO mechanical characteristics. Two groups of individuals will participate: individuals with post-traumatic osteoarthritis in the ankle and healthy individuals. Testing will occur without an orthosis and while wearing orthoses with four proximal cuff designs representative of currently available devices: 1) a rigid patellar tendon bearing (PTB) clamshell cuff secured using a mechanical ratcheting system, 2) a PTB shell with a fixed pivot point secured with Velcro, 3) a rigid clamshell cuff secured with Velcro, and 4) a semi-rigid cuff with a flexible outer layer secured with Velcro.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

PARTICIPANTS WITH PTOA:

Inclusion criteria

  • Ages 18-65.
  • Diagnosis of ankle PTOA.
  • Ability to walk 50 feet at a slow to moderate pace.
  • Ability to walk without a cane or crutch.
  • Ability to read and write in English and provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis with a moderate or severe brain injury.
  • Diagnosis with a physical or psychological condition that would preclude functional testing (e.g. cardiac condition, clotting disorder, pulmonary condition…).
  • Ankle weakness as a result of spinal cord injury or nervous system pathology.
  • Nerve, muscle, bone, or other condition limiting function in the contralateral extremity.
  • Rheumatoid or inflammatory arthritis.
  • Necrosis of any bones in the foot or ankle.
  • Pain of 8/10 or greater during walking.
  • Surgery on study limb anticipated in the next 6 months.
  • Uncorrected visual or hearing impairments.
  • Require use of a stabilizing device (i.e. Ankle Foot Orthosis or Knee Orthosis…) to perform daily activities.
  • Pregnancy
  • Body mass index greater than 40.

HEALTHY ABLE-BODIED PARTICIPANTS:

Inclusion criteria

  • Ages 18-65.
  • Without current complaint of lower extremity pain, spine pain, open wounds or active infection.
  • Ability to hop without pain.
  • Ability to perform a full squat without pain.
  • Ability to read and write in English and provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis with a moderate or severe brain injury.
  • Diagnosis with a physical or psychological condition that would preclude functional testing (e.g. cardiac condition, clotting disorder, pulmonary condition).
  • Medical conditions or injuries that have limited participation in work or exercise in the last 6 months.
  • Medical conditions of injuries limiting function for greater than 6 weeks.
  • Uncorrected visual or hearing impairments.
  • Use of an assistive device.
  • Pregnancy
  • Body mass index greater than 35.

Treatment and study plan

Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)

Device

The carbon fiber custom dynamic orthosis will consist of a semi-rigid foot plate, a posterior carbon fiber strut, and a proximal cuff that wraps around the leg below the knee. The design of the proximal cuff will differ between CUFF-A, CUFF-B, CUFF-C, CUFF-D.

Other names: Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO)

Primary outcomes

  1. Peak Plantar Force (total foot)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Force data (N) collected from the total foot (100% of sensor), measured between the foot and orthosis during gait.

  2. Plantar Force Impulse (total foot)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the total foot (100% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk in each study condition.

  3. Peak Plantar Force (forefoot)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Force data (N) collected from the total foot (distal 40% of sensor), measured between the foot and orthosis during gait.

  4. Plantar Force Impulse (forefoot)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the total foot (distal 40% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk in each study condition.

  5. Peak Plantar Force (midfoot)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Force data (N) collected from the total foot (middle 30% of sensor), measured between the foot and orthosis during gait.

  6. Plantar Force Impulse (midfoot)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the total foot (middle 30% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk in each study condition.

  7. Peak Plantar Force (hindfoot)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Force data (N) collected from the total foot (proximal 30% of sensor), measured between the foot and orthosis during gait.

  8. Plantar Force Impulse (hindfoot)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the total foot (proximal 30% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk in each study condition.

  9. Numerical Pain Rating Scale

    Time frame: Baseline

    Pain will be assessed using a standard 11-point numerical pain rating scale, in which 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable.

  10. PROMIS Patient Reported Outcomes for Physical Function

    Time frame: Baseline

    The Patient Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS) physical function Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) is a computerized assessment measuring physical function. It is scored using a T-score in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. In a given PROMIS domain, a T-score above 50 represents more of the measured variable than the population average.

  11. PROMIS Patient Reported Outcomes for Pain Interference

    Time frame: Baseline

    The Patient Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS) pain interference Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) is a computerized assessment measuring pain interference. It is scored using a T-score in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. In a given PROMIS domain, a T-score above 50 represents more of the measured variable than the population average.

  12. Participant Device Preference

    Time frame: Baseline

    The participant will rank order their preference for their standard of care device (if applicable), NoCDO, CUFF-A, CUFF-B, CUFF-C, CUFF-D on a questionnaire.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ankle Range of Motion

    Time frame: Baseline

    Peak ankle dorsiflexion (degrees) during gait.

  2. Peak Ankle Moment

    Time frame: Baseline

    Peak ankle moment (Nm/kg) during gait.

  3. Peak Ankle Power

    Time frame: Baseline

    Peak ankle power (W/kg) during gait.

  4. Modified Socket Comfort Score (Comfort)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Comfort scores range from 0 = most uncomfortable to 10 = most comfortable.

  5. Modified Socket Comfort Score (Smoothness)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Comfort scores range from 0 = least smooth to 10 = most smooth.

Other outcomes

  1. Center of Pressure Velocity Timing

    Time frame: Baseline

    Timing of peak center of pressure velocity (percent stance) during gait.

  2. Center of Pressure Velocity Magnitude

    Time frame: Baseline

    Magnitude of peak center of pressure velocity (m/s) during gait.

  3. Tibialis Anterior Muscle Activity

    Time frame: Baseline

    Electromyography (EMG, % Maximum) of the tibialis anterior during gait.

  4. Peroneus Longus Muscle Activity

    Time frame: Baseline

    Electromyography (EMG, % Maximum) of the peroneus longus during gait.

  5. Soleus Muscle Activity

    Time frame: Baseline

    Electromyography (EMG, % Maximum) of the soleus during gait.

  6. Medial Gastrocnemius Muscle Activity

    Time frame: Baseline

    Electromyography (EMG, % Maximum) of the medial gastrocnemius during gait.

  7. Semi-Structured Interview

    Time frame: Baseline

    Semi-structured interviews will also be used to fully capture the patients' perspectives, experience, and opinions associated with the device options they experienced as part of the study.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Iowa

Other

Collaborators

  • Fabtech Systems

Registry information

Acronym: AFOCUFF

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jul 13, 2022
Registry last updated
Jan 15, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.