Post graduate institute of dental sciences
Rohtak, Haryana, 124001, India
NCT Number: NCT05791682
Study was aimed to evaluate and compare clinical efficacy of the Microfilled resin sealant, Nanofilled resin sealant, Flowable composite as sealant, with Unfilled resin sealant on first permanent molar in children at 9 months follow ups.
Children (age 7 to 10) with deep pits and fissures, (ICDAS 0-2) included in the study and study was Split mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.
Sample size- Total number of 42 patients will be recruited in the study, with 42 first permanent molars in each group.
Methods-Patients were seated in supine position on the dental chair and cotton rolls will be applied for isolation. The first permanent molar in each group was treated as follows:
Group 1 -Intervention with Microfilled resin sealant. Group 2- ¬Intervention with Nanofilled resin sealant. Group 3 -Intervention with Flowable composite as sealant. Group 4 - ¬Intervention with Unfilled resin sealant. Patients and their parents were received instructions for daily brushing and oral hygiene maintenance. Sealant clinical efficacy was evaluated at 3, 6 and 9 month recall visit.
OUTCOME MEASURES:
1. Primary outcomes: To evaluate sealant retention, anticaries effect and marginal integration. 2. Secondary outcomes: to evaluate, colour change and surface roughness of sealant.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me7 year–10 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Rohtak, Haryana, 124001, India
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion crieteria
Exclusion criteria
FISSURIT FX- MICROFILLED RESIN SEALANT WITH 55% FILLER GRANDIOSEAL- NANOFILLED RESIN SEALANT WITH 70% FILLER TE-ECONOM- FLOW -FLOWABLE COMPOSITE AS SEALANT CLINPRO TM- UNFILLED RESIN SEALANT
Time frame: 9 months
Alpha - complete retention Bravo- partial retention Charlie- no retention
Time frame: 9 months
Alpha- No visible evidence of a crevice along the margin of the sealant that the explorer could penetrate.
Bravo- Visible evidence of a crevice along the margin of the sealant that the explorer could penetrate.
Time frame: 9 months
Alpha- Sound fissures. Bravo- Fissures with caries.
Time frame: 9 months
Alpha- No discoloration anywhere on the margin around the sealant. Bravo- Visible partial discoloration the margin around sealant. Charlie- Visible discoloration on the margin around all sealant.
Time frame: 9 months
Alpha- The sealant is similar to polished enamel. Bravo- The sealant surface is similar to composite material surface contained submicron filler.
Charlie- The surface is rough that prevents the explorer movement along the surface.
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak
Other
"Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Microfilled Resin Sealant, Nanofilled Resin Sealant and Flowable Composite as Sealant With Unfilled Resin Sealant on Permanent First Molar Teeth in Children."
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.