Community
San Lucas Tolimán, Guatemala
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06444308
This study is to determine if hypertension management by community health workers (CHW) supported by a mobile health application and remote physician supervision is non-inferior to management by a physician for the primary outcome of improvement in systolic blood pressure. The target population is patients with hypertension in rural Guatemala. Study duration will be 12-24 months.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
San Lucas Tolimán, Guatemala
Location status: Recruiting
The investigators have developed an innovative system of care utilizing CHWs equipped with a mobile application and supported and supervised remotely by physicians. This model of care is adapted from a CHW-led diabetes program enabled by a similar CDS application which the investigators implemented in the same communities in rural Guatemala where we will carry out this proposed study. This program safely led to significant improvements in glycemic control. The mobile application is built on the widely-used CommCare platform and provides clinical decision support (CDS) to CHWs based on protocols from the WHO and the International Society of Hypertension for antihypertensive medication initiation and titration, lifestyle counseling, and identification of patients requiring a higher level of care.
The Primary Objective is to determine if hypertension management by CHWs is non-inferior to care provided directly by a physician.
The Secondary Objective is to evaluate the safety, acceptability to patients, and cost of CHW-led care compared to care provided directly by a physician.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
For those assigned to the CHW arm, management will be assisted by CDS from the CommCare application.
teleconsultation with a supervising physician
The physician will have received training and orientation on the same clinical protocols followed by the CHWs, as well as access to reference materials for these protocols, but the version of the CommCare application used will not provide CDS, but will serve to record and review patient data only.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
Indicated by the proportion of diabetic patients with HbA1c less than 8 and the proportion of diabetic patients with HbA1c less than their personalized goal.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
The H-SCALE: Medication Adherence subscale is scored from 0-21 where higher scores indicate a more positive attitude toward adherence.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
The H-SCALE: Weight Management subscale is scored from 9-45 where higher scores indicate a more positive attitude toward weight management.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
The H-SCALE: Physical Exercise subscale is scored from 0-14 where higher scores indicate a more positive behavior toward physical exercise.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
The H-SCALE: Smoking Exposure subscale is scored from 0-14 where a score of 0 indicates a more positive attitude toward smoking exposure.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
The H-SCALE: Alcohol Intake subscale contains three questions and is scored as abstainer (does not drink) or non-adherent (reported drinking alcohol).
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
The H-SCALE: Healthy Eating Plan subscale is scored from 0-70 where higher scores indicate a more positive attitude toward healthy eating.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
PACIC will be scored on a likert scale from 1-5 (almost never to almost always) where higher scores indicate better assessment of chronic illness care.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
Scored from 1-5 where higher scores indicate less satisfaction with hypertension care.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
PCAR is the total number of doses dispensed less that total doses missed divided by the total doses dispensed.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months (all participants assessed to 6 months, but participants on study early may also be assessed at 12, 18 and 24 months)
Self-reported adherence is rated on a five point scale of how often patients are taking their medications as directed, from "less than half the time" to "100% of the time".
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 12 months
The proportion of a set of true-false or multiple choice questions developed for this study to assess hypertension-related lifestyle knowledge answered correctly
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months
Time frame: up to 24 months
Time frame: up to 24 months
Time frame: up to 24 months
Time frame: up to 24 months
Time frame: up to 24 months
Time frame: up to 24 months
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Other
Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Community Health Worker-led Hypertension Management Enabled by a Mobile Clinical Decision Support Application Compared to Physician Care: a Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07740434
Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Cardiovascular (CV) Risk
Chenôve, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07074145
Adherence Interventions, Behavior
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05962372
Abdominal Obesity, Body Weight
San Juan, Puerto Rico
View Trial DetailsNCT07728630
Cardiovascular Diseases, Endothelial Function
Osijek, Croatia
View Trial Details