Combivent CFC-MDI
Drug36/206 mcg Four times a day (QID)
NCT Number: NCT01019694
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate long-term safety and patient acceptability of COMBIVENT RESPIMAT Inhalation Spray as compared to the COMBIVENT Inhalation Aerosol Chlorofluorocarbon-Metered Dose Inhaler (CFC-MDI) and the free combination of ATROVENT Hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) and albuterol Hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) inhalation aerosols.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
1012.62.153 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site, Jasper, Alabama, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
36/206 mcg Four times a day (QID)
Open label randomized parallel
Open label randomized parallel
Time frame: 48 weeks
Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied).
Time frame: 3 weeks
Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied).
Time frame: 12 weeks
Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied).
Time frame: 24 weeks
Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied).
Time frame: 36 weeks
Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied).
Time frame: 0 weeks
Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).
Time frame: 3 weeks
Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).
Time frame: 12 weeks
Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).
Time frame: 24 weeks
Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).
Time frame: 36 weeks
Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).
Time frame: 48 weeks
Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).
Time frame: 0 weeks
CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).
Time frame: 3 weeks
CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).
Time frame: 12 weeks
CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).
Time frame: 24 weeks
CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).
Time frame: 36 weeks
CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).
Time frame: 48 weeks
CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).
Time frame: 0 weeks
Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).
Time frame: 3 weeks
Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).
Time frame: 12 weeks
Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).
Time frame: 24 weeks
Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).
Time frame: 36 weeks
Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).
Time frame: 48 weeks
Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).
Time frame: baseline, day 1
Change from test-day baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 1 hour post dose on test day 1.
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Change from test-day baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 1 hour post dose at Week 12
Time frame: baseline, 24 weeks
Change from test-day baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 1 hour post dose at Week 24
Time frame: baseline, 48 weeks
Change from test-day baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 1 hour post dose at Week 48
Time frame: baseline, day 1
Change from test-day baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 1 hour post dose on test day 1.
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Change from test-day baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 1 hour post dose at Week 12
Time frame: baseline, 24 weeks
Change from test-day baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 1 hour post dose at Week 24
Time frame: baseline, 48 weeks
Change from test-day baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 1 hour post dose at Week 48
Time frame: 0 weeks
Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 0
Time frame: 3 weeks
Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 3
Time frame: 12 weeks
Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 12
Time frame: 24 weeks
Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 24
Time frame: 36 weeks
Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 36
Time frame: 48 weeks
Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 48
Time frame: 48 weeks
Time frame: 48 weeks
Boehringer Ingelheim
Industry
Patient Acceptability of Ipratropium Bromide/Albuteroll Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler in Adults With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07252908
Chronic Disease, Disease Attributes
Chongqing, Chognqing, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07649577
Asthma, Bronchial Diseases
Amman, Jordan
View Trial DetailsNCT06979518
Chronic Disease, Disease Attributes
Cypress, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06367686
Apnea, Chronic Disease
Tønsberg, Norway
View Trial Details