University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
NCT Number: NCT06091215
This is a single-site, non-randomized, non-controlled study at UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas in the Department of Plastic Surgery. The study is designed to follow up to 15 consenting subjects who may receive up to 2 BBL/MOXI/HALO treatments under an IRB approved protocol.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
Subjects will receive 1-2 BBL/MOXI/HALO treatments. All 2nd treatments will be scheduled 4-8 weeks after the initial treatment to ensure the skin has enough time to recover. Overall assessments will be collected before the first treatment and at subsequent follow-up visits at 1 Month and 3 Months post final treatment. Identifiable full-face standard and close-up photography will be obtained and used to evaluate any changes. Subjects will also have photos obtained with the VISIA-CR Imaging System (Canfield Scientific, Parsippany, NJ). Quantitative analysis will be completed on the VISIA imaging system and be used to compare the effects of the treatments. Any improvements will be evaluated to pre-treatment assessments.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
5.1. will be asked to agree to a pregnancy test before their screening visit in clinic 5.2. must use an acceptable method of birth control
Exclusion criteria
Sciton Joule System
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Quantitively assessment of change in overall UV spots using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects
A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Quantitively assessment of change in overall UV spots using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects
A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Quantitively assessment of change in overall UV spots using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects
A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Quantitively assessment of change in overall UV spots using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects
A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Quantitively assessment of change in overall pore count using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects
A lower value signifies improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Quantitively assessment of change in overall pore count using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects
A lower value signifies improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Quantitively assessment of change in overall pore count using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects
A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Quantitively assessment of change in overall pore count using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects
A lower value signifies improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Quantitively assessment of change in overall porphyrins count using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects
A lower value signifies improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Quantitively assessment of change in overall porphyrins count using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects
A lower value signifies improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Quantitively assessment of change in overall porphyrins count using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects
A lower value signifies improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Quantitively assessment of change in overall porphyrins count using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects
A lower value signifies improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Quantitively assessment of change in overall red features using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects
A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Quantitively assessment of change in overall red features using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects
A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Quantitively assessment of change in overall red features using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects
A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Quantitively assessment of change in overall red features using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects
A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Quantitively assessment of change in overall texture using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects. Skin analysis is performed by the system to generate a numerical roughness count by providing a tally of the feature.
A lower value signifies improvement. Minimum and Maximum value does not exist.
The value is an Absolute Score derived from the integration of multiple topographical variables; because it measures the intensity of texture rather than a specific length or depth, it has no standard metric unit
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Quantitively assessment of change in overall texture using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects. Skin analysis is performed by the system to generate a numerical roughness count by providing a tally of the feature.
A lower value signifies improvement. Minimum and Maximum value does not exist.
The value is an Absolute Score derived from the integration of multiple topographical variables; because it measures the intensity of texture rather than a specific length or depth, it has no standard metric unit
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Quantitively assessment of change in overall texture using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects. Skin analysis is performed by the system to generate a numerical roughness count by providing a tally of the feature.
A lower value signifies improvement. Minimum and Maximum value does not exist.
The value is an Absolute Score derived from the integration of multiple topographical variables; because it measures the intensity of texture rather than a specific length or depth, it has no standard metric unit
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Quantitively assessment of change in overall texture using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects. Skin analysis is performed by the system to generate a numerical roughness count by providing a tally of the feature.
A lower value signifies improvement. Minimum and Maximum value does not exist.
The value is an Absolute Score derived from the integration of multiple topographical variables; because it measures the intensity of texture rather than a specific length or depth, it has no standard metric unit
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Quantitively assessment of change in overall UV spots using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects
A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Quantitively assessment of change in overall UV spots using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects
A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Quantitively assessment of change in overall UV spots using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects
A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Quantitively assessment of change in overall UV spots using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects
A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Quantitively assessment of change in overall visible spots using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects
A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Quantitively assessment of change in overall visible spots using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects
A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Quantitively assessment of change in overall visible spots using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects
A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Quantitively assessment of change in overall visible spots using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects
A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Quantitively assessment of change in overall wrinkle are using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects
A lower value signifies improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Quantitively assessment of change in overall wrinkle are using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects
A lower value signifies improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Quantitively assessment of change in overall wrinkle are using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects
A lower value signifies improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Quantitively assessment of change in overall wrinkle are using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects
A lower value signifies improvement.
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Other
Combining Broad Based Light, Fractionated 1927 and Dual Wavelength 2940/1470 for Diffuse Pigmentation, Texture and Actinic Changes
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05690269
Hyperoxia, Hypoxemia
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06123572
Aging, Pathologic Processes
Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
View Trial DetailsNCT07537595
Healthy Volunteers, Hyperpigmentation
Bucharest, Romania
View Trial DetailsNCT05311033
Pathologic Processes, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Nice, Alpes-maritimes, France
View Trial Details