Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education and Department of Gastroenterology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 02-781, Poland
NCT Number: NCT01613534
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of two treatment regimens: argon plasma coagulation (APC) alone and APC in combination with sucralfate administered for chronic hemorrhagic radiation proctopathy.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 02-781, Poland
Chronic radiation proctopathy (CRP) or proctosigmoiditis is a late complication of pelvic radiotherapy. Symptoms, including diarrhea, rectal bleeding, urgency, and tenesmus, are difficult to treat and adversely impact patient quality of life. Various treatments directed at the reduction of blood loss and improvement of other symptoms have been evaluated, with the most encouraging results reported for two methods: endoscopic argon plasma coagulation (APC) of radiation-induced abnormal vessels in the rectal mucosa, and administration of sucralfate, a drug believed to enhance the mucosal defense and healing when administered orally or rectally. Adequately powered randomized trials comparing various treatments are lacking, and an optimal management strategy has yet to be determined. To address this issue, we conducted a single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of APC alone and APC in combination with sucralfate administered orally.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Argon plasma coagulation treatment followed by oral sucralfate (6 grams b.i.d.) for four weeks
Other names: Carafate, Ulgastran
Argon plasma coagulation treatment followed by placebo administration for four weeks
Time frame: baseline vs. 16 week
Three-item symptom scale Diarrhea - score 1: 1-3 stools/24 h; 2: 4-6 stools/24 h; 3 >6 stools/24 h Bleeding - score 0: No blood; 1: Blood on toilet paper or stool; 2: Blood in toilet bowl; 3: Heavy bleeding with clots; 4: Bleeding requiring transfusions Tenesmus/rectal pain - score 0: Absent; 1: Mild tenesmus not requiring any drug; 2: Tenesmus requiring analgesics/antispasmodics; 3: Severe tenesmus requiring everyday use of analgetics/antispasmodics.
Time frame: baseline vs. week 8 and week 16
Endoscopic severity score of chronic radiation proctopathy:
Normal, score 0 - Normal mucosa Mild, score 3 - Erythema and/or teleangiectasia, edema, thickening, pallor of mucosa Moderate, score 6 - Above plus friability Severe, score 9 - Ulceration and/or necrosis
Time frame: baseline vs. week 52
disease severity score as in primary outcome measure
Time frame: baseline to 16 weeks
Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology
Other
Argon Plasma Coagulation Plus Placebo or Oral Sucralfate for Chronic Radiation Proctopathy: a Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06837597
Chronic Radiation Proctitis
View Trial Details