CPLU (clinique psychologique et logopédique de l université de Liège)
Liège, 4000, Belgium
NCT Number: NCT06633263
The goals of this interventional study is to study if the combine effects of Behavioral Activation Treatment for Depression (BATD) and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) is effective on primary outcomes : depression, insomnia, well-being and anxiety and secondary outcomes : worry, rumination, behavioral inertia, experiential avoidance, anticipatory pleasure deficits, cognitive resource deficits, emotional reactivity, quality of sleep, and sleep beliefs for participants suffering from depression and insomnia disorders.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–67 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Liège, 4000, Belgium
Depression is a widespread mental disorder characterized by affective, cognitive and physiological disturbances that impact individuals' daily functioning. Sleep difficulties are an essential component of the clinical picture of depression. Several interventional studies have demonstrated the value of specific insomnia treatment in the management of depression. Indeed, the absence of targeted treatment for insomnia increases the risk of depressive relapse. In this context, the importance of specific treatment of insomnia in cases of comorbidity with depression, and the need to integrate this approach into clinical practice, have recently been highlighted. However, very few studies have explored the efficacy of combined treatment of insomnia (with Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia - CBT-I) and depression (with Behavioural Activation Treatment for Depression - BATD). However, one study has shown that BATD can have beneficial effects on sleep quality (in caregivers of people with Alzheimer's disease). The combined treatment of CBT-I and BATD, as well as the importance of the order of administration of these interventions in cases of insomnia-depression comorbidity, however, remain unexplored.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the overall effect of the combination of CBT-I and a BATD on depressive symptoms and insomnia in the short, medium and long term. It also seeks to examine the specific effects of each intervention. In addition, the study assesses efficacy and adherence under two different orders of treatment combination, while exploring the psychological mechanisms likely to promote positive symptoms change. Finally, it looks at inter-individual differences in responses to interventions. Our study will help provide empirical evidence on the efficacy of combined treatment for people suffering from insomnia and depression. By identifying the psychological mechanisms that may promote improvement in these comorbid disorders, it could also help refine and improve current treatments.
Participants will be recruited through a number of sources, including the CPLU (Clinique Psychologique et Logopédique de l Université de Liège), word of mouth, announcements within the University (e.g. via the student and staff quality of life service), social networks, and various CHU departments. A flyer will be distributed by clinicians and on social networks, including Facebook. Participants will also be identified through CHU psychologists, doctors and psychiatrists, who have potential access to the target population (people suffering from sleep disorders and depression).
An initial telephone interview will take place to check the inclusion and exclusion criteria, explain how the study works and the various appointment dates.
Participants wishing to take part in the study, but presenting exclusion criteria, will be redirected to appropriate care services according to their difficulties. This may include services specializing in sleep disorders, services dedicated to the management of psychological disorders, psychiatric emergencies in the event of significant suicidal ideation, or individual psychological follow-up by a specialized therapist (such as primary care psychologists or CBT psychotherapists).
If the person meets the criteria, an initial interview will be arranged. During this first clinical interview, the protocol will be presented in greater detail. Participants' expectations and motivations will be investigated to ensure that the proposed intervention can meet them. The information letter and informed consents will be offered to the participant. A socio-demographic questionnaire will be proposed. The content of the assessments to be completed daily will be presented to the participants. At the end of this interview, they will also be invited to complete the standardized pre-intervention questionnaires.
Participants will then begin self-observation for two weeks, before starting the first intervention (CBT-I in condition 1 and BATD in condition 2). This will be followed by a further two-week period of observation without intervention, prior to the second intervention (BATD in condition 1 and CBT-I in condition 2). A final two-week self-observation phase follows the second intervention.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Introduce self-recording with the sleep diary; Introduce basic notions of insomnia; Introduce basic notions of sleep hygiene; Introduce basic notions of sleep; Recreate a time and place dedicated to sleep; Limit time spent in bed to time slept; Promote attitudes and beliefs that favor sleep and manage worries; Relapse prevention. This intervention is empirically validated (Morin, 2022).
Introduce self-recording with daily activities; Introduce the basic concept of depression; Identify and increase activities associated with positive reinforcement; Reflect on life domains and values to identify reinforcing activities; Identify and decrease activities associated with negative reinforcement; Identify and decrease activities associated with negative reinforcement; Relapse prevention. This intervention is empirically validated (Ciharova et al., 2021)
Time frame: Six measures. Up to two weeks before the intervention, up to two weeks after the first intervention, up to two weeks after the second intervention, three months after the second intervention, six months after the second intervention, and two years after
Generalised Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire. Scores ranges from 0 to 21. Higher scores means worse outcome (higher anxiety symptoms)
Time frame: Six measures. Up to two weeks before the intervention, up to two weeks after the first intervention, up to two weeks after the second intervention, three months after the second intervention, six months after the second intervention, and two years after
Patient Health Questionnaire. Scores ranges from 0 to 27. Higher scores means worse outcome (higher depressive symptoms)
Time frame: Six measures. Up to two weeks before the intervention, up to two weeks after the first intervention, up to two weeks after the second intervention, three months after the second intervention, six months after the second intervention, and two years after
Insomnia Severity Index. Scores ranges from 0 to 28. Higher scores means worse outcome (higher insomnia)
Time frame: Six measures. Up to two weeks before the intervention, up to two weeks after the first intervention, up to two weeks after the second intervention, three months after the second intervention, six months after the second intervention, and two years after
Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory - General and physical fatigue. Scores ranges from 9 to 45. Higher scores means worse outcome (higher general and physical fatigue).
Time frame: Six measures. Up to two weeks before the intervention, up to two weeks after the first intervention, up to two weeks after the second intervention, three months after the second intervention, six months after the second intervention, and two years after
Well-being - Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale. Scores ranges from 14 to 70. Higher scores means better outcome (higher well-being)
Time frame: Up to two weeks before the intervention
Age, gender, socio-economical status, situation at home
Time frame: Six measures. Up to two weeks before the intervention, up to two weeks after the first intervention, up to two weeks after the second intervention, three months after the second intervention, six months after the second intervention, and two years after
Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep Scale. Scores ranges from 0 to 160. Higher scores means worse outcome (higher dysfunctional beliefs)
Time frame: Two measures. up to two weeks after the first intervention, up to two weeks after the second intervention,
Consumer Satisfaction Questionnaire. Scores ranges from 8 to 32. Higher scores means better outcome (higher satisfaction)
Time frame: Everyday through intervention completion (from week 1 up to 16 weeks later)
Activation level was collected daily at the end of the day in a booklet with the following item -I have been an active person and have accomplished the goals I set for myself- accompanied by a visual Analogue Scale (ranging from left side : not at all to right side completely). Scores ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores means better outcome (higher behavioral activation)
Time frame: Everyday through intervention completion (from week 1 up to 16 weeks later)
Rumination level was collected daily at the end of the day in a booklet with the following item -I spent a lot of time dwelling on my problems- accompanied by a visual Analogue Scale (ranging from left side : not at all to right side completely). Scores ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores means worse outcome (higher rumination)
Time frame: Everyday through intervention completion (from week 1 up to 16 weeks later)
Anticipatory pleasure level was collected daily at the end of the day in a booklet with the following item -I m looking forward to some upcoming events or activities- accompanied by a visual Analogue Scale (ranging from left side : not at all to right side completely). Scores ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores means better outcome (higher anticipatory pleasure)
Time frame: Everyday through intervention completion (from week 1 up to 16 weeks later)
Avoidance level was collected daily at the end of the day in a booklet with the following item -Most of the things I did were aimed at escaping or avoiding something unpleasant.- accompanied by a visual Analogue Scale (ranging from left side : not at all to right side completely). Scores ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores means worse outcome (higher avoidance)
Time frame: Everyday through intervention completion (from week 1 up to 16 weeks later)
Worry level was collected daily at the end of the day in a booklet with the following item -I worry about everything all the time- accompanied by a visual Analogue Scale (ranging from left side : not at all to right side completely). Scores ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores means worse outcome (higher worry)
Time frame: Everyday through intervention completion (from week 1 up to 16 weeks later)
Emotional Reactivity level was collected daily at the end of the day in a booklet with the following item -I have found it difficult to cope emotionally with stressful situations or events that others might consider unimportant- accompanied by a visual Analogue Scale (ranging from left side : not at all to right side completely). Scores ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores means worse outcome (higher emotional reactivity)
Time frame: Everyday through intervention completion (from week 1 up to 16 weeks later)
Emotional Reactivity 2 level was collected daily at the end of the day in a booklet with the following item -I have a tendency to react strongly, emotionally, to stressful situations or events that could have a negative impact on my sleep- accompanied by a visual Analogue Scale (ranging from left side : not at all to right side completely). Scores ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores means worse outcome (higher emotional reactivity)
Time frame: Everyday through intervention completion (from week 1 up to 16 weeks later)
Cognitive ressources level was collected daily at the end of the day in a booklet with the following item -It was easy for me to concentrate on a difficult task, even when there was noise all around- accompanied by a visual Analogue Scale (ranging from left side : not at all to right side completely). Scores ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores means better outcome (better attentional focusing).
Time frame: Everyday through intervention completion (from week 1 up to 16 weeks later)
Cognitive ressources level was collected daily at the end of the day in a booklet with the following item -It was easy for me to alternate between two different tasks- accompanied by a visual Analogue Scale (ranging from left side : not at all to right side completely). Scores ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores means better outcome (better attentional flexibility)
Time frame: Everyday through intervention completion (from week 1 up to 16 weeks later)
Sleep quality (Sleep onset latency, Total sleep Time, Wake after sleep onset, sleep efficiency) was collected daily via a sleep diary. Higher sleep onset latency and higher wake after sleep onset scores means a worse outcome, higher total sleep time and sleep efficiency means a better outcome
Time frame: Three measures. Up to two weeks before the intervention, up to two weeks after the first intervention, up to two weeks after the second intervention
A semi-structured interview with open-ended questions focusing on participants; experiences and change processes.
University of Liege
Other
Combined Effect of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia and a Behavioral Activation Program for Depression on Depressive Symptoms and Insomnia : A Multiple Case Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07553364
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07279363
Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD), Alcohol-Related Disorders
Rochester, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07048600
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Cluj-Napoca, Romania
View Trial DetailsNCT07335276
Depression - Major Depressive Disorder, Dyssomnias
View Trial Details