Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07724938

Combination Tonsillectomy and Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for OSA Patients With Lateral Pharyngeal Collapse

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether removing the tonsils at the time of hypoglossal nerve stimulation improves treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in adults whose airway collapses from the side of the upper airway during sleep. The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. Does hypoglossal nerve stimulation combined with tonsillectomy reduce the severity of obstructive sleep apnea more than hypoglossal nerve stimulation alone? 2. Does tonsillectomy improve how effectively hypoglossal nerve stimulation opens and stabilizes the upper airway?

Researchers will compare participants who receive hypoglossal nerve stimulation with tonsillectomy to participants who receive hypoglossal nerve stimulation alone.

Participants will:

* Complete sleep studies, questionnaires, and other assessments before and after treatment * Be randomly assigned to receive hypoglossal nerve stimulation either with or without tonsillectomy * Return for follow-up visits and sleep testing to evaluate treatment effectiveness * In a subset of participants, complete additional overnight testing to measure how treatment changes upper-airway collapsibility

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States

About this study

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is commonly treated with hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS), but treatment efficacy is substantially reduced in patients with complete oropharyngeal lateral wall (OPLW) collapse. HGNS primarily enlarges the airway by protruding the tongue and is therefore most effective in patients with anteroposterior patterns of airway collapse. Tonsillectomy reduces tissue contributing to lateral pharyngeal narrowing and may complement the mechanism of HGNS by addressing residual lateral wall obstruction. Preliminary clinical data suggest that combining tonsillectomy with HGNS substantially improves treatment response compared with HGNS alone in patients with OPLW collapse, but this strategy has not been evaluated in a randomized clinical trial.

This prospective, randomized controlled trial will enroll 72 adults with moderate-to-severe OSA, complete OPLW collapse identified on drug-induced sleep endoscopy, and candidacy for both HGNS implantation and tonsillectomy. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive either concurrent HGNS implantation plus tonsillectomy or HGNS implantation alone. All participants will undergo standard postoperative device activation and titration. The primary efficacy endpoint will be assessed after approximately one month of optimized HGNS therapy using sleep studies and patient-reported outcomes. Participants in the HGNS-alone group with persistent OSA may subsequently undergo delayed tonsillectomy as part of standard clinical care, permitting additional within-subject mechanistic comparisons.

The primary objective is to determine whether concurrent tonsillectomy improves the effectiveness of HGNS in reducing OSA severity compared with HGNS alone. Secondary objectives are to determine whether tonsillectomy enhances HGNS-induced improvements in upper-airway collapsibility and to evaluate whether tonsillectomy modifies the physiological effects of HGNS beyond the effects of either treatment alone. In an optional mechanistic substudy, approximately 30 participants will undergo detailed physiological sleep studies to measure pharyngeal collapsibility using gold-standard techniques, providing insight into the mechanisms underlying any observed improvement in clinical outcomes.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 15 events/hour
  • Complete oropharyngeal lateral wall (OPLW) collapse identified on DISE
  • Candidate for HGNS implantation based on standard clinical criteria
  • Presence of small (1-2+) tonsils and eligibility for tonsillectomy
  • Untreated OSA at the time of enrollment
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Absence of tonsils
  • Presence of large tonsils (3-4+; not eligible for HGNS)
  • Predominant central or mixed sleep apnea (>25% central or mixed events)
  • Any unstable or serious medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would increase risk or interfere with study participation
  • Ineligibility for HGNS implantation based on standard clinical or surgical criteria
  • Inability to comply with study procedures or follow-up assessments

Treatment and study plan

Tonsillectomy

Procedure

Tonsillectomy

HGNS

Device

HGNS alone (without concomitant tonsillectomy)

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent reduction in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI)

    Time frame: 1 month of optimized therapy.

    Percent reduction in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), measured by overnight polysomnography, from baseline to the primary follow-up sleep study. Higher values indicate greater improvement in obstructive sleep apnea.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Absolute change in apnea-hypopnea index

    Time frame: 1 month of optimized therapy.

    Absolute change in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), measured in events per hour by overnight polysomnography, from baseline to the primary follow-up sleep study. Negative values indicate improvement in obstructive sleep apnea.

  2. Treatment success

    Time frame: 1 month of optimized therapy

    Treatment success is defined as a ≥50% reduction in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) from baseline and a follow-up AHI <15 events per hour. The outcome is reported as the proportion of participants meeting this definition (0-100%), with higher values indicating greater treatment success.

  3. Change in Sleep Apnea Hypoxic Burden from Baseline

    Time frame: 1 month of optimized therapy

    Sleep apnea hypoxic burden will be calculated from overnight polysomnography using the validated Azarbarzin method (PMID: 30376054) as the cumulative area under the oxygen desaturation curve associated with apneas and hypopneas, normalized to total sleep time and expressed as %min/hour. Higher values indicate greater hypoxic burden.

Other outcomes

  1. PROMIS Sleep Disturbance

    Time frame: 1 month of optimized therapy

    The PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Short Form 8b assesses perceptions of sleep quality, sleep depth, and difficulties with sleep. Scores are reported as standardized T-scores (mean = 50 and SD = 10), with higher scores indicating greater sleep disturbance (worse outcome).

  2. PROMIS Sleep-Related Impairment

    Time frame: 1 month of optimized therapy

    The PROMIS Sleep-Related Impairment Short Form 8a assesses daytime impairment associated with poor sleep, including sleepiness, fatigue, and reduced alertness. Scores are reported as standardized T-scores (mean = 50 and SD = 10), with higher scores indicating greater sleep-related impairment (worse outcome).

  3. PROMIS Fatigue

    Time frame: 1 month of optimized therapy

    The PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 7a assesses the experience and impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Scores are reported as standardized T-scores (mean = 50 and SD = 10), with higher scores indicating greater fatigue (worse outcome).

  4. Sleep apnea quality of life

    Time frame: 1 month of optimized therapy

    The Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index (SAQLI) assesses disease-specific quality of life in obstructive sleep apnea. Total scores range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating better sleep-related quality of life (better outcome).

  5. Epworth sleepiness scale

    Time frame: 1 month of optimized therapy

    The Epworth Sleepiness Scale assesses subjective daytime sleepiness. Total scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater daytime sleepiness (worse outcome).

  6. VAS treatment satisfaction

    Time frame: 1 month of optimized therapy

    Participants rate overall satisfaction with treatment on a 0-10 visual analog scale, where 0 indicates not at all satisfied and 10 indicates completely satisfied. Higher scores indicate greater treatment satisfaction (better outcome).

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Daniel Vena, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

16178520719

Dillon Gilbertson, BASc

CONTACT

[email protected]

617-732-6488

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary

Registry information

Acronym: HGNS+T

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2030
Study completion
2031
First posted
Jul 24, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 24, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.