Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536, United States
NCT Number: NCT03958045
The purpose of this study is to evaluate survival and response rate of the combination rucaparib and nivolumab as maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive small cell lung carcinoma.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536, United States
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is one of the most aggressive malignancies with a 5-year survival rate of less than 7%. SCLC is characterized by rapid doubling time, high growth fraction and early development of widespread metastases. SCLC accounts for roughly 93% of all high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas. The prognosis for SCLC is extremely poor with a median survival less than a year for extensive-stage disease. Therapeutic options have not advanced significantly in over two decades, with frontline treatment consisting of platinum doublet therapy for 3-6 cycles. While most patients show an initial favorable response to Carboplatin/cisplatin + etoposide, this response is usually short-lived. Most patients relapse with resistant disease between 3 to 6 months after completion of initial chemotherapy.
Based on preclinical data supporting the role of immune checkpoint and PARP (poly ADP ribose polymerase ) inhibitors in SCLC, combining nivolumab and rucaparib has the potential to prolong progression-free survival and overall survival. These two classes of drugs have non-overlapping toxicities. This novel combination has not been tried in a front-line maintenance setting for SCLC.
Eligible patients will have pathological (biopsy) or cytologically confirmed stage IV SCLC, and have achieved either partial or complete response post frontline chemotherapy with platinum doublet. Patients will be treated with combination rucaparib and nivolumab. The recommended starting dose of rucaparib as a continuously administered oral monotherapy is 600 mg BID. Nivolumab will be administered as an intravenous infusion once every 4 weeks at a fixed dose of 480 mg. In the absence of treatment delays due to adverse event(s), treatment may continue for 24 months.
Progression-free survival, overall survival, disease control rates, objective response rate, quality of life, and tumor mutation burden will be evaluated during this study (up to 2 years).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Rucaparib (600mg BID) and Nivolumab (480mg IV q4 wk)
Time frame: 0-2 years
Duration (time) of progression-free survival after response to initial platinum-based therapy.
Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions from starting maintenance treatment
Time frame: 8 weeks, 16 weeks and 24 weeks post-treatment
Disease control rate (DCR) is the number of patients who had either complete response (CR, Disappearance of all target lesions), partial response (PR, >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions) or stable disease (SD, less than 30% decrease in the sum of the biggest dimension but no more than 20% increase ) per RECICST 1.0 divided by the total number of patients. DOR= (CR+PR+SD)/Total number on trial x 100%.
The timepoints were combined. The best responses were used in calculating disease control rate
Time frame: 0-2 years
Percentage of surviving participants at 1 and 2 years
Time frame: 8 weeks, 16 weeks and 24 weeks post-treatment
Objective response rate (ORR) is the proportion of patients with complete response or partial response according to RECIST v1.1. Patients with complete response at baseline will be excluded from ORR analysis.
The timepoints were combined. The best responses were used in calculating objective response rate
Time frame: Baseline
Quality of life is assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaire, which probes function and symptoms. Scores range from 0-100. High scores on functional scales represent a high/healthy level of functioning; high scores symptom scales represent a high level of symptomology.
Time frame: 4 months
Quality of life is assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaire, which probes function and symptoms. Scores range from 0-100. High scores on functional scales represent a high/healthy level of functioning; high scores symptom scales represent a high level of symptomology.
Time frame: Disease Progression up to 2 years
Quality of life is assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaire, which probes function and symptoms. Scores range from 0-100. High scores on functional scales represent a high/healthy level of functioning; high scores symptom scales represent a high level of symptomology.
Time frame: 0-3 years
Correlate tumor mutation burden with treatment response.
Time frame: 0-3 years
A combined positive score (CPS) for Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) will be derived from immunohistochemical analysis of tumor tissue.
Zhonglin Hao
Other
Phase II Study of Combination Rucaparib With Nivolumab in Platinum-Sensitive Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients as Maintenance After Induction Therapy With Platinum Doublet
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04924101
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02769962
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03881488
Adenoma, Bronchial Neoplasms
Ocala, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04256421
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Lone Tree, Colorado, United States
View Trial Details