Department of Psychiatry, China Medical University Hospital
Taichung, Taiwan
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT04959201
Previous studies found that some NMDA-enhancing agents were able to improve clinical symptoms of patients with schizophrenia. In addition, several drugs with antioxidant properties have been tested in clinical trials for the treatment of schizophrenia too. Whether combined treatment of an NMDA-enhancing agent and a drug with antioxidant property can be better than an NMDA-enhancing agent alone deserves study.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Taichung, Taiwan
Location status: Recruiting
Several lines of evidence suggest that both NMDA and oxidative stress hypotheses have been implicated in schizophrenia. Previous studies found that some NMDA-enhancing agents were able to augment efficacy of antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia. In addition, several drugs with antioxidant properties have been tested in clinical trials for the treatment of schizophrenia too. Whether a drug with antioxidant property can strengthen the efficacy of an NMDA-enhancer (NMDAE) in the treatment of schizophrenia remains unknown. Therefore, this study aims to compare NMDAE plus a drug with antioxidant property and NMDAE plus placebo in the treatment of schizophrenia. The subjects are the schizophrenia patients who remain symptomatic while having been stabilized with antipsychotic treatment. They keep their original treatment and are randomly, double-blindly assigned into two treatment groups for 12 weeks: (1) NMDAE plus Antioxidant agent (AO), or (2) NMDAE plus placebo. Clinical performances and side effects are measured at weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12. Cognitive functions are assessed at baseline and at endpoint of treatment by a battery of tests. The efficacies of NMDAE plus AO and NMDAE plus placebo will be compared.
Chi-square (or Fisher's exact test) will be used to compare differences of categorical variables and t-test (or Mann-Whitney test if the distribution is not normal) for continuous variables between treatment groups. Mean changes from baseline in repeated-measure assessments will be assessed using the generalized estimating equation (GEE). All p values for clinical measures will be based on two-tailed tests with a significance level of 0.05.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Use of an NMDA enhancer plus a drug with antioxidant property for the treatment of schizophrenia.
Use of an NMDA enhancer plus placebo as a comparator.
Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12
Assessment of overall symptoms. Minimum value: 30, maximum value:210, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12
Assessment of negative symptoms. Minimum value: 0, maximum value:100, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12
Assessment of positive symptoms. Minimum value: 7, maximum value:49, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12
Assessment of negative symptoms. Minimum value: 7, maximum value:49, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12
Assessment of general psychopathology. Minimum value: 16, maximum value:112, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12
Assessment of general impression. Minimum value: 1, maximum value:7, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12
Assessment of social, occupational, and psychological function. Minimum value: 1, maximum value:100, the higher scores mean better function.
Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12
Assessment of depressive symptoms. Minimum value: 0, maximum value:52, the higher scores mean a worse outcome
Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12
Assessment of life quality. Minimum value: 0, maximum value:126, the higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: Week 0, 12
Ten tests for assessment of 7 cognitive domains:
All tests have no unit. Firstly, for the domain (a. and c.) with more than one test, a composite T score will be calculated by standardizing the average of each T score (with a mean of 50 and a SD of 10 for making every test comparative). Secondly, a global composite score (for all seven domains) and a neurocognitive composite score (for the first 6 domains, a-f) will be also calculated by standardizing the average of the T score of each domain (Lane HY et al, JAMA Psychiatry. 2013).
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
China Medical University Hospital
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07045142
Dyslipidemias, Lipid Metabolism Disorders
Zhumadian, Henan, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07369154
Mental Disorders, Schizophrenia
Chandler, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07411222
Behavior, Bipolar Disorder
Bolu, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06882785
Mental Disorders, Schizophrenia
Kōnan, Aichi-ken, Japan
View Trial Details