carmustine
DrugGiven IV
NCT Number: NCT01511562
The purpose of this study is to find out what effects (good and/or bad) treatment with chemotherapy and stem cell transplant compared with chemotherapy alone will have on primary CNS B-cell lymphoma. Currently the best treatment for patients with primary CNS B-cell lymphoma is not known.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Alaska Breast Care and Surgery LLC, Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Primary Objective:
To compare the two-year progression-free survival (PFS) of patients treated with the myeloablative consolidation treatment strategy of HDT/ASCT versus those treated with non-myeloablative consolidation chemotherapy with cytarabine and etoposide
Secondary Objectives:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Given IV
Given IV
Given IV
Given IV
Time frame: 2 years
The primary endpoint is to compare the two-year progression-free survival (PFS) of patients treated with the myeloablative consolidation treatment strategy of HDT/ASCT versus those treated with non-myeloablative consolidation chemotherapy with cytarabine and etoposide.
PFS time = time from Registration to earliest date of Progression or Death due to any cause, censoring non-progressed and alive patients at the date of last disease status evaluation.
Response will be defined using the modified IPCG criteria. Progressive disease is defined as > 25% increase in contrast-enhancing CNS (brain and spine if latter abnormal at baseline) disease, appearance of any new, measurable (>/= 10mm) contrast-enhancing disease or recurrent or new ocular or CSF disease.
Time frame: 2 years
To compare the two-year event-free survival (EFS) of patients treated with consolidation HDT/ASCT versus those treated with consolidation chemotherapy consisting of etoposide and cytarabine.
EFS event = same definition as PFS with non-protocol treatment also considered an event
Time frame: 7 years
Number of patients reporting at least one adverse event at least possibly related to treatment.
Time frame: 2 years
To compare the overall survival (OS) of patients treated with the consolidation HDT/ASCT versus those treated with consolidation chemotherapy consisting of etoposide and cytarabine.
OS event = Registration/Randomization to Death due to any cause
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
Other
A Randomized Phase II Trial of Myeloablative Versus Non-Myeloablative Consolidation Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Primary CNS B-cell Lymphoma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00544115
Anemia, Anemia, Aplastic
View Trial DetailsNCT04739813
Burkitt Lymphoma, DNA Virus Infections
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03995147
B Cell Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03223610
Burkitt Lymphoma, DNA Virus Infections
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details