Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisante)
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, 1011, Switzerland
NCT Number: NCT05357508
The primary objective is to study the effect of communicating individual CRC risk score and screening recommendations on appropriate screening uptake at six months in individuals at low, moderate and high risk of developing CRC.
The secondary objectives:
* Assess the feasibility of a subsequent larger RCT designed to detect a change in clinical outcomes; * Explore the impact of psychological factors (perceived susceptibility for CRC, perceived benefits from and barriers to screening) on appropriate screening uptake and participation rates.
The investigators will perform a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 880 residents from the canton Vaud (Switzerland) aged between 50 and 69 years. The QCancer calculator will be used to calculate the personalized risk score. The participants in the intervention group will receive a brochure with a personalized risk score and appropriate screening recommendations. The participants in the control group will receive the standard brochure of the Vaud CRC screening program, regardless of participants' risk level. Six months after the intervention, the investigators will measure the proportion of the participants who have undergone appropriate screening. Screening will be considered as appropriate if participants at high risk undertake colonoscopy and participants at low risk undertake FIT. Both tests are appropriate for participants at moderate-risk. The hypothesis is that in the intervention group, individuals will be more likely to undergo screening appropriate to a participant's individual risk level, whereas the choice of the screening test in the control group will not differ between risk levels.
This study should advance the field of risk-based screening. This may give insights about how to optimize CRC screening programs and offer to the population screening options with a better risk-benefit balance.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me50 year–69 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, 1011, Switzerland
Colorectal cancer (CRC) can be effectively prevented by screening. Risk to develop CRC within 15 years is related to increasing age, sex, family history, and lifestyle and, thus, can vary from <1% to >15%.
Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and colonoscopy are the most widely used screening tests. Colonoscopy is the most accurate test, but is related to risks of bleeding and perforation. Colonoscopy resources are limited, and high uptake of screening colonoscopy for low-risk individuals can cause long wait times for those with CRC symptoms or positive FIT. FIT is less costly can be done at home without preparation and, if done regularly, prevents most CRC mortality, especially in moderate and low-risk individuals. To offer the screening options with a reasonable risk-benefit balance, FIT should be recommended to individuals at low (<3% to develop CRC in 15 years) and moderate (3-6%) risk, and colonoscopy to those at high (>6%) risk.
The primary objective is to study the effect of communicating individual CRC risk score and screening recommendations on appropriate screening uptake at six months in individuals at low, moderate and high risk of developing CRC.
The secondary objectives:
The investigators will perform a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 880 residents from the canton Vaud (Switzerland) aged between 50 and 69 years. The QCancer calculator will be used to calculate the personalized risk score. The participants in the intervention group will receive a brochure with a personalized risk score and appropriate screening recommendations. The participants in the control group will receive the standard brochure of the Vaud CRC screening program, regardless of the participant's risk level. Six months after the intervention, the investigators will measure the proportion of the participants who have undergone appropriate screening. Screening will be considered as appropriate if participants at high risk undertake colonoscopy and participants at low risk undertake FIT. Both tests are appropriate for participants at moderate-risk. The hypothesis is that in the intervention group, individuals will be more likely to undergo screening appropriate to participant's individual risk level, whereas the choice of the screening test in the control group will not differ between risk levels.
This study should advance the field of risk-based screening. This may give insights about how to optimize CRC screening programs and offer to the population screening options with a better risk-benefit balance.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Provide participants with information about their personalized risk for colorectal cancer and appropriate screening recommendations to facilitate their screening option choice.
Provide participants with general information about options for colorectal cancer screening.
Time frame: 6-8 months after the intervention
Proportion who completed screening test appropriate to risk level. For low risk (<3% 15-yr CRC risk), completing a FIT. For intermediate risk (3-6%15-yr CRC risk), completing a FIT, completing a colonoscopy, or having a colonoscopy appointment. For high risk (>6% 15-yr CRC risk), completing a colonoscopy or having a colonoscopy appointment.
Time frame: 6-8 months after the intervention
Proportion who completed any CRC screening test (FIT, colonoscopy, colonoscopy appointment, CT colonography, blood test, etc.
Time frame: 6 weeks after mailed invitations
Proportion of those invited with completed paper or electronic consent
Time frame: 6 weeks after mailed invitations
Proportion of those who returned the baseline questionnaire who are eligible for the Vaud screening program (i.e. not up-to-date with screening, not in colonoscopy surveillance, no personal CRC history, etc.)
Time frame: 6 weeks after mailed invitations
Mean anxiety score using adapted questions from a standardized questionnaire (STAI Fr)
Time frame: 3-6 months after measurement of primary outcome
Proportion of study participants who consent and whose screening status are obtained from the Vaud CRC screening program
Time frame: 6 months to 10 years after measurement of primary outcome
Proportion of study participants who consent and whose cancer status are obtained from the Vaud tumor registry. Long time frame chosen given considerable delay in updating the tumor registry and interest in cancer outcomes several years after measurement of primary outcome.
Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisante), University of Lausanne, Switzerland
Other
Protocol Title: Colorectal Cancer Screening Decisions Based on Predicted Risk: the PREcision ScreENing Randomized Controlled Trial (PRESENT)
Acronym: PRESENT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06068257
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Orlando, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07725692
Anastomotic Leak, Colon Cancer
Alexandria, Please Select, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07180303
Colonic Diseases, Colorectal Cancer
Liyang, Jiangsu, China
View Trial DetailsNCT03958747
Colonic Diseases, Colorectal Cancer
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
View Trial Details