University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States
NCT Number: NCT05453630
This study aims to test the effectiveness of a remotely-delivered patient navigation program for increasing colonoscopy completion for colorectal cancer screening, among rural populations. The study will partner with geographically disparate primary care organizations to recruit patients aged 45-75 to the study. The patient navigation program will be delivered through a community organization. This project is critical in advancing our knowledge of the effectiveness of patient navigation for increasing colonoscopy in this patient population as well as for understanding factors that can support long term implementation and sustainability of effective interventions.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me45 year–915 month
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer death in the United States and its burden is greater in rural and low-income communities. Failure to complete recommended colonoscopy contributes to later-stage CRC diagnosis and worse CRC outcomes, which means timely and successful colonoscopy is a key opportunity to reduce CRC mortality. Using a Type 1 Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness design, we will randomize 480-600 subjects from 6-8 primary care clinical organizations in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to accomplish the following:
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients will receive navigation from a trained lay navigator at a community-based nonprofit organization that supports access to high quality healthcare. The patient navigator will work with patients to schedule their colonoscopy and identify, explore, and overcome barriers. They will educate patients about the colonoscopy procedure and preparation, provide resources, and coach and motivate patients.
Educational brochure about colonoscopy
Time frame: 1 year
Number of participants who received a colonoscopy within 12 months (365 days) of their referral for the procedure. Electronic health record documentation of the procedure (e.g., procedure report, pathology report, results letter) or self-report was used to determine whether the patient received the colonoscopy.
Time frame: 9 months
Number of participants who received a colonoscopy within 9 months (274 days) of their referral for the procedure. Electronic health record documentation of the procedure (e.g., procedure report, pathology report, results letter) or self-report was used to determine whether the patient received the colonoscopy.
Time frame: 6 months
Number of participants who received a colonoscopy within 6 months (183 days) of their referral for the procedure. Electronic health record documentation of the procedure (e.g., procedure report, pathology report, results letter) or self-report was used to determine whether the patient received the colonoscopy.
Time frame: 1 year
Kaplan-Meier estimated median days to completion. Based on the number of days to colonoscopy completion or end of the 12 month (365 day) follow-up period, from the participant's referral for the procedure. Electronic health record documentation of the procedure (e.g., procedure report, pathology report, results letter) or self-report was used to determine whether the patient received the colonoscopy.
Time frame: 1 year
Number of participants who received a colonoscopy within 12 months of their referral who had documentation of adequate bowel preparation in their electronic health record. Adequate bowel preparation was defined as a subjective rating of fair, adequate, good, or excellent; or a Boston Bowel Preparation Score (BBPS) total of 6 or higher. The BBPS scale ranges from 0-9 with higher values indicating better preparation.
Time frame: 1 year
Number of participants who received a colonoscopy within 12 months of their referral who had documentation of cecal intubation in their electronic health record. Cecal intubation was considered achieved if there was text documenting reaching the cecum or photographic documentation labeled with cecal landmarks in the procedure information.
University of Washington
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06068257
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Orlando, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07725692
Anastomotic Leak, Colon Cancer
Alexandria, Please Select, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07180303
Colonic Diseases, Colorectal Cancer
Liyang, Jiangsu, China
View Trial DetailsNCT03958747
Colonic Diseases, Colorectal Cancer
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
View Trial Details