Collagen Paste vs Mucosal Advancement Flap for FIA

Rectal advancement flaps have been advocated as a means of closing high fistulas with preservation of the external sphincter muscle. With this technique, it shows promising results with success rate of approximately 60%. However, complications have been reported, in particular with a change of continence in 30-35% of patients.

Collagen paste is a novel sphincter-preserving method for fistula closure. Permacol (Medtronic, USA) is a sterile acellular cross-linked porcine dermal collagen matrix suspension. The paste-like suspension form a matrix that accelerates neovascularization, cellular infiltration which promotes healing and fistula closure. The theoretical benefits of paste form compared to previous collagen plug design is that the collagen can moulded into the fistula cavity or tract. This allows better tissue contact with the collagen thus improves healing and reduces the chance of dislodgement. Limited data is available to date. Success rates of collagen paste range from 47.6% to 63%. Hence it has a potential to be the first-line treatment for high FIA with low complication rates and without causing disruption to the anal sphincter complex.

Inclusion criteria

• Clinical diagnosis of high cryptoglandular fistula-in-ano.
• Patients must have undergone a prior EUA to characterise the nature of the fistula.
• The fistula tract should be ≥ 2 cm in length.
• Only a single internal fistula opening should be present at EUA, such that the fistula is suitable for treatment by insertion of a seton drain.
• Patients must have been treated with a draining seton for a minimum period of 6 weeks prior to randomisation.
• Patients must be aged ≥ 18 years and able to provide informed consent.
• Fistulas must be of cryptoglandular aetiology.

Exclusion criteria

• Unable/unwilling to provide informed consent.
• Contraindication to general anaesthesia or spinal anaesthesia.
• Low trans-sphincteric fistulas.
• Non-cryptoglandular fistulas (e.g. Crohn's disease, obstetric, irradiation, malignant, etc.).
• Other perineal fistulas (e.g. rectovaginal fistulas, pouch-vaginal fistulas, etc.).
• Complex disease in which more than one internal fistula opening is present and requiring concurrent insertion of more than one fistula plug.
• Clinical evidence of active perianal sepsis. In the event that there is disagreement between clinical and radiological assessment of active sepsis/collection, the clinical opinion will prevail.
• Cultural or religious objection to the use of pig tissue.
• Absolute contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (e.g. cardiac pacemaker).
• Patients with recurrent anal fistulas previously treated with a fistula plug.