Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1081 HV, Netherlands
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06185556
The primary objective of this phase IIb/III, prospective, randomized clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of irreversible electroporation (IRE) with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with perivascular or peribiliary colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), that are not amenable for surgical resection or thermal ablation. Efficacy is assessed in terms of local control at 2 years.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1081 HV, Netherlands
Location status: Recruiting
Rationale: Currently, the gold standard for perivascular and peribiliary colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), that are not amenable for surgical resection or thermal ablation, is undetermined. Two non-thermal treatment modalities could provide a solution for these anatomically challenging CRLM: irreversible electroporation (IRE) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).
IRE is a new, minimal-invasive image-guided treatment method for tumors not amenable for surgical resection or thermal ablation, due to vicinity near vital structures such as vessels and bile ducts. With IRE, multiple electrical pulses are applied to tumorous tissue. These pulses alter the existing transmembrane potential of the cell membranes, and create 'nanopores', after which the cell dies through loss of homeastasis. SBRT is another non-thermal ablation modality and has important advantages over conventional radiotherapy such as a more precise and greater biological dose delivery and hence less toxicity and presumably better outcome.
Study design: The COLDFIRE-III trial is a phase IIB/III, prospective randomized clinical trial. The primary conducting center will be the Amsterdam UMC (Amsterdam, the Netherlands). The purpose of this study is to assess and compare the efficacy of IRE and SBRT for perivascular or peribiliary CRLM in terms of local control at 2 years. Other objectives are overall survival, additional efficacy endpoints, safety, pain assessments and costs. For the sample size calculations, the log-rank test is used. The (2-year survival) proportion in group 1 (a treatment group) is 0.80. The proportion in group 2 (the alternative treatment group) is 0.55. The significance level of the test is 0.10. A total number of 78 patients will be randomized into one of two arms: arm A (IRE, n = 39) and arm B (SBRT, n = 39).
Study population: 78 patients with 1-3 perivascular and peribiliary lesions of 0-5 cm, ineligible for surgical resection and thermal ablation, suitable for both IRE and SBRT and no or limited extrahepatic disease (1 extrahepatic lesion is allowed, not including positive para-aortic lymph nodes, celiac lymph nodes, adrenal metastases, pleural carcinomatosis or peritoneal carcinomatosis) can be included. Supplementary resections for resectable lesions and thermal ablations for unresectable CRLM are allowed. A maximum number of 10 CRLM are allowed for patients with no extrahepatic disease and a maximum number of 5 lesions are allowed for patients with limited extrahepatic disease. Eligible patients will be stratified according to tumor size (≤3cm vs. 3-5 cm) and (induction) chemotherapy prior to local treatment.
Intervention: Patients will be randomized into one of two arms, arm A (IRE) and arm B (SBRT). The expert panel, consisting of at least two interventional radiologists, two radiation oncologists and two hepatobiliary surgeons, will appoint lesions that are ineligible for surgery of thermal ablation, and suitable for both IRE and SBRT, as target lesions.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Percutaneous (CT-guided) irreversible electroporation of 1-3 perivascular and peribiliary colorectal liver metastasis.
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (CT- or MRI-guided) of 1-3 perivascular and peribiliary colorectal liver metastases.
Time frame: 2 years
Local control is defined as no objectified signs for local tumor progression on imaging acquired 23-24 months following start of the initial study procedure, according to the RECIST criteria. Site recurrences within the first 12 months that are successfully retreated once using the same technique (re-IRE or re-SBRT), thermal ablation or surgical resection will not be regarded as an event for local control. Per patient analysis.
Time frame: Assessed up to 5 years
Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to the time of death due to any cause or to the last day of follow up (censored).
Time frame: Assessed up to 5 years
Local tumor progression-free survival is defined as the time from randomization to the time of unequivocal local tumor progression.
Time frame: Assessed up to 5 years
Distant tumor progression-free survival is defined as the time from randomization to the time of unequivocal distant tumor progression.
Time frame: Assessed up to 5 years
Time to progression is defined as the time from randomization to the time of local disease progression, new metastases (events). The date of death from any cause is considered to be a competing risk
Time frame: Assessed up to 5 years
Rate of adverse events and serious adverse event, graded from I to V according to the standard classification of surgical complications.
Time frame: Assessed up to 1 year
Pain assessment using visual analogue scale questionnaires (VAS; per procedure analysis: Assessed prior to, directly after and every three months after local treatment.
Time frame: Assessed up to 1 year
The quality of life is assessed in both treatments using EORCT QLQ-C30 questionnaire (per procedure analysis), prior to, and every three months after treatment during a total follow-up time of 1 year.questionnaires: Assessed prior to, and every three months after local treatment.
Time frame: Assessed up to 1 year
The quality of life is assessed in both treatments using EQ-5D questionnaire (per procedure analysis), prior to, and every three months after treatment during a total follow-up time of 1 year.questionnaires: Assessed prior to, and every three months after local treatment.
Time frame: Assessed up to 1 year
The quality of life is assessed in both treatments using PRODISQ questionnaire (per procedure analysis), prior to, and every three months after treatment during a total follow-up time of 1 year.questionnaires: Assessed prior to, and every three months after local treatment.
Time frame: Assessed up to 5 years
Direct and indirect total costs of care, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Other
COLDFIRE-III Trial: Perivascular and Peribiliary Colorectal Liver Metastases (0-5cm): Irreversible Electroporation Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
Acronym: COLDFIRE-III
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06200831
Colonic Diseases, Colonic Neoplasms
Oslo, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT06630624
Colonic Diseases, Colorectal Cancer
Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT05861505
Chemotherapy Effect, Colonic Diseases
Amsterdam, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT06258525
5-Fluorouracil Toxicity, Cardiovascular Diseases
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial Details