Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07425834

Cold Dissection vs Electrocautry on TCR in Septoplasty

This study aims to address these gaps by comparing the incidence of TCR during septoplasty performed using cold dissection versus electrocautery, while also incorporating a novel assessment of surgical force.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Fayoum University Hospital

Al Fayyum, 63514, Egypt

About this study

Septoplasty is one of the most commonly performed otorhinolaryngological procedures and is generally considered safe . However, it may be associated with rare but potentially serious autonomic reflexes, most notably the trigeminal cardiac reflex (TCR) . The TCR is a brainstem reflex characterized by sudden parasympathetic activation resulting in bradycardia, hypotension, arrhythmias, or even asystole following stimulation of the trigeminal nerve or its branches. Clinically, TCR is usually defined as a sudden reduction in heart rate exceeding 20% from baseline during trigeminal nerve stimulation . The trigeminal nerve provides rich sensory innervation to the nasal septum, particularly in the posterior septal region and near the sphenopalatine area. Surgical manipulation in these areas during septoplasty can trigger TCR, especially when the stimulus is intense or prolonged . While TCR has been extensively reported in neurosurgical, maxillofacial, and skull base procedures, its occurrence during nasal surgery is increasingly recognized but remains underreported and underinvestigated .

Several factors are believed to influence the incidence and severity of TCR, including the type, intensity, and duration of trigeminal stimulation. Both mechanical stimulation, such as traction, pressure, or fracture of bone and cartilage, and thermal stimulation, such as electrocautery, can activate trigeminal afferents . Experimental and clinical observations suggest that thermal stimulation may produce a stronger and more sustained trigeminal response compared to mechanical manipulation alone, potentially leading to a higher incidence of TCR . Despite the widespread use of electrocautery for dissection and hemostasis during septoplasty, there is limited evidence directly comparing its impact on TCR incidence with that of cold steel dissection techniques. Cold dissection relies primarily on mechanical separation using scissors, chisels, and elevators, avoiding thermal injury to surrounding tissues and neural endings. Whether this difference in stimulus modality translates into a clinically significant difference in TCR incidence has not been systematically evaluatedData analysis will be carried out using SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics) and/or R.

Continuous variables will be expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) when normally distributed, or as median with interquartile range for non- normally distributed data. Categorical variables will be summarized as frequencies and percentages. A p-value of less than 0.05 (two-tailed) will be considered statistically significant. Group comparisons will be conducted using: Independent samples t-test for normally distributed continuous data, Mann-Whitney U test for skewed continuous data, Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical data.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-60 years.
  • Indicated for primary septoplasty.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II.

Exclusion criteria

  • History of cardiac arrhythmias or conduction abnormalities.
  • Use of beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, or antiarrhythmic drugs Previous nasal surgery.
  • Combined nasal procedures.
  • Intraoperative complications requiring deviation from the assigned technique.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of TCR

    Time frame: 3 hours from induction

    Defined as a decrease in heart rate >20% from baseline during surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Magnitude of heart rate reduction

    Time frame: 3 hours from induction

    reduction of heart rate less than 50 beats/min

  2. Intraoperative hypotension or arrhythmias

    Time frame: 3 hours from induction

    decrease mean blood pressure less than 60mmgh

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Fatmaelzahraa O Bahr, Lecture

CONTACT

[email protected]

00201097356769

Mohamed A Hamed, Professor

CONTACT

[email protected]

00201010509736 ext. +201118560065

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fatmaelzahraa Omar Mahmoud Bahr

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Impact of "Cold Dissection" vs. "Electrocautery" on the Incidence of TCR During Septoplasty

Acronym: TCR

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Feb 23, 2026
Registry last updated
Feb 24, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.