Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01599598

Coherence Training for Military Personnel

Military operations and training situations present many physical and psychological challenges for service members to adapt to and overcome. The challenges of these changing conditions necessitate having to cope with stress, which is seen as the negative perceptions, feelings, and emotions that manifest from the subjective physical and/or mental strain on life processes. In addition, service members are returning from deployments having gone through traumatic experiences that can develop into posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression or other serious conditions. The Surface Warfare Independent Duty Corpsman (IDC) School is an example of a training environment where some students may be entering the program with symptoms of PTSD, which may preclude or make it more difficult for them to perform well. Autonomic nervous system (ANS) dysregulation has been observed in patients with PTSD and those experiencing chronic stress, such that there is more arousing, sympathetic input to the heart than calming, parasympathetic input, which is usually the dominant division of the ANS involved in controlling one's heart rate. The IDC training program is an example of an environment where the service member is expected to excel while being subjected to multiple sources of stress. The fast tempo coupled with performance expectations may induce stress and actually inhibit learning. The Institute of HeartMath has developed the Coherence Advantage program which teaches one to self-regulate their emotions while focusing on breathing to compliment the active process of self-regulation. In conjunction, the emWave Personal Stress Reliever allows the user to receive heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback, hence giving the user the opportunity to self-regulate their ANS through breathing and self-regulation techniques. The proposed study will test the effectiveness of the Coherence Advantage program versus progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) in reducing stress symptomatology among Surface Warfare IDC students. The effectiveness of these two different interventions will be compared on outcomes of PTSD, depression, anxiety, sleep quality, perceived stress, attrition, and class performance.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Surface Warfare Medicine Institute

San Diego, California, 92134, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Sailors
  • Enrolled as students in the Surface Warfare Medicine Institute's Independent Duty Corpsman School

Exclusion criteria

  • Administratively rolled over into another class
  • Dropped out of the school (due to academic or medical reasons)

Treatment and study plan

Progressive Muscle Relaxation

Behavioral

Participants will be instructed to practice the techniques twice daily for 5-15 minutes per session, and subsequently use the techniques when confronted with a stressful event such as a project deadline, exam, skill evaluation, etc. Participants in this condition will listen to PMR instruction by way of a mp3 player.

Coherence Advantage

Behavioral

Participants will be instructed to practice the techniques twice daily for 5-15 minutes per session, and subsequently use the techniques when confronted with a stressful event such as a project deadline, exam, skill evaluation, etc. Participants in this condition will practice the techniques while using a biofeedback device to recognize when they enter psychophysiological coherence.

Other names: emWave2

Primary outcomes

  1. Stress symptomatology

    Time frame: 12 months

    The effectiveness of the two stress intervention trainings will be evaluated on symptoms of depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, generalized anxiety, perceived stress, and sleep quality.

Secondary outcomes

  1. School performance

    Time frame: 12 months

    The effectiveness of the two stress intervention trainings will be evaluated on final grades.

  2. Attrition

    Time frame: 12 months

    The effectiveness of the two stress intervention trainings will be evaluated on rates of attrition.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego

Fed

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
May 16, 2012
Registry last updated
Aug 19, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.