University of Liège
Liège, 4000, Belgium
NCT Number: NCT04873661
Patients with cancer often suffer from a symptom cluster, including pain, fatigue, sleep difficulties, emotional distress and cognitive impairments. In oncology settings, there is a growing interest in "mind-body" intervention, to relieve them in a non-pharmacological way. Hypnosis and meditation are two modified state of consciousness shown to positively this symptom cluster. Cognitive trance is also a modified state of consciousness, but is induced by body movements and/or vocalizations. Subjective reports of experts in cognitive trance showed a modification of self, emotion regulation, pain perception, attention and concentration. However, we still need to develop studies to better characterise this particular state of consciousness and its clinical applications. Our randomized-controlled trial aims at comparing both interventions in terms of (1) benefits on cancer patients' quality of life (pain, fatigue, sleep, distress, cognitive impairments), (2) phenomenological/subjective experiences and neurophysiological correlates, and (3) mechanisms involved in patients' responsiveness, based on the biopsychosocial model of hypnosis.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Liège, 4000, Belgium
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
See arm description
See arm description
See arm description
Time frame: Assessed before the intervention (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and at 3- and 12-month follow-up (T3 and T4)
Assessed with a questionnaire (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory; MFI-20)
Time frame: Assessed before the intervention (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and at 3- and 12-month follow-up (T3 and T4)
Assessed with a visual analogue scale (VAS) (score range from 0 to 10/10, a higher score indicating a higher pain)
Time frame: Assessed before the intervention (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and at 3- and 12-month follow-up (T3 and T4)
Assessed with a questionnaire (Insomnia Severity Index; ISI). Score range from 0 to 28, with a higher score indicating higher sleep difficulties.
Time frame: Assessed before the intervention (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and at 3- and 12-month follow-up (T3 and T4)
Assessed with a questionnaire (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; HADS). Score range from 0 to 42, with a higher score indicating higher emotional distress
Time frame: Assessed before the intervention (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and at 3- and 12-month follow-up (T3 and T4)
Assessed with a questionnaire (FACT-Cog), investigation 4 dimensions (perceived cognitive impairments, score range 0-72, higher score indicating less impairments ; impact of cognitive impairments on quality of life, score range 0-16, with higher scoe indicating less impact ; Comments from others, score range 0-16 with higher score indicating less comments ; perceived cognitive abilities, score range 0-28, with higher score indicating more cognitive abilities)
Time frame: Assessed before the intervention (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and at 3- and 12-month follow-up (T3 and T4)
Assessed with a questionnaire (Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory; MPFI-24). Score range from 0 to 6 for each dimension (psychological flexibility and psychological inflexibility), with higher score indicating higher flexibility or inflexibility according to the dimension assessed.
Time frame: Assessed before the intervention (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and at 3- and 12-month follow-up (T3 and T4)
Assessed with a questionnaire (Mental adjustment to cancer; MAC). 2 summary scores (Summary positive adjustment, score range from 17 to 68, with higher score indicating higher positive adjustmen ; Summary Negative Adjustment, score ranging from 16 to 64, with higher score indicating highr negative adjustment)
Time frame: Assessed before the intervention (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and at 3- and 12-month follow-up (T3 and T4)
Assessed with a questionnaire (Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire; CERQ). 2 summary scores (adpative regulation, score ranging from 20 to 100, with higher score indicating higher adaptive regulation ; non-adaptive regulation, score ranging 12-60, with higher score indicating higher non-adaptive regulation)
Time frame: Assessed before the intervention (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and at 3- and 12-month follow-up (T3 and T4)
Assessed with a questionnaire composed of 7 VAS (score from 0 to 10/10, with higher score indicating higher empowerment), based on the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ)
Time frame: Assessed before the intervention (T0)
Assessed with a questionnaire (Big Five Short Form; BFI-10). 5 scales (extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, openness to experience) with score range 1-5, with higher score indicating a stronger presence of this personality trait.
Time frame: Assessed before the intervention (T0)
Assessed with a questionnaire designed by our team investigating the previous imaginative experiences of the participant. 25 true/false items. Total score ranging from 0 to 25, with higher score indicating higher level of fantasy proneness.
Time frame: Assessed before the intervention (T0)
Assessed with 2 VAS (score range from 0 to 10/10, with higher score indicating higher motivation and higher expectations)
Time frame: Assessed before the intervention (T0)
Free text written by the participant
Time frame: Assessed immediately after the intervention (T1), and at 3- and 12-month follow-up (T3 and T4)
Free text written by the participant
Time frame: Assessed immediately after the intervention (T1), and at 3- and 12-month follow-up (T3 and T4)
Assessed with a questionnaire (Memory Characteristics Questionnaire; MCQ). Score range from 8 to 104, with higher score indicating higher degree of details about the memory.
Time frame: Assessed immediately after the intervention (T1), and at 3- and 12-month follow-up (T3 and T4)
Assessed with a questionnaire (Revised Mystical Characteristics Questionnaire; MEQ-30). 4 scales (mystical, score range 0-75, with higher score indicating a more mystical experience ; Positive mood, score range 0-30, with higher score indicating more positive mood during the episode ; Transcendence of time and space, score range 0-30, with higher score indicating stronger trenscendence ; Ineffability, score range 0-15, with higher score indicating higher ineffability)
Time frame: Assessed immediately after the intervention (T1), and at 3- and 12-month follow-up (T3 and T4)
Assessed with a questionnaire designed by our team to assess the feeling of presence in the imaginative environment linked to the intense memory reported (hypnosis, trance, meditation or personal memory). 2 scales (Presence in the suggested environment and Interaction with others, score range for each dimension 6-42, with higher score indicating higer presence/interaction).
Time frame: Assessed immediately after the intervention (T1), and at 3- and 12-month follow-up (T3 and T4)
Assessed with a VAS (score range from 0 to 10/10, with higher score indicating better relationship quality).
Time frame: Resting state : Assessed before the intervention (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and at 12-month follow-up (T4). During hypnosis, trance or meditation : T1, T4.
Assessed with an electroencephalogram (EEG), during resting state and during hypnosis, trance or meditation, according to the chosen intervention. During the EEG, we will also measure the heart rate (with an electrocardiogram), the body temperature, the body movements (with an electromyogram) and the respiration amplitude.
Time frame: Resting state : Assessed before the intervention (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and at 12-month follow-up (T4). During hypnosis, trance or meditation : T1, T4.
During the EEG, heart rate will be measured (with an electrocardiogram).
Time frame: Resting state : Assessed before the intervention (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and at 12-month follow-up (T4). During hypnosis, trance or meditation : T1, T4.
During the EEG, body movements will be measured (with an electromyogram).
Time frame: Resting state : Assessed before the intervention (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and at 12-month follow-up (T4). During hypnosis, trance or meditation : T1, T4.
During the EEG, body temperature will be measured (with a dedicated electrode put on the chest).
Time frame: Resting state : Assessed before the intervention (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and at 12-month follow-up (T4). During hypnosis, trance or meditation : T1, T4.
During the EEG, respiration (amplitude, effort) will be measured (with a dedicated belts put on the torso)
University of Liege
Other
Hypnosis, Meditation and Cognitive Trance on Cancer Patients: Impact on Quality of Life and Neurophysiology
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01954420
Cancer, Fatigue
Rockford, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00946803
Cancer, Fatigue
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05869604
Behavior, Cancer
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00769301
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Fredrikstad, Norway
View Trial Details