Laureate Institute for Brain Research
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136, United States
NCT Number: NCT04941066
The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility and efficacy of real-time fMRI neurofeedback for rumination.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136, United States
Neuroimaging MRI techniques for measuring brain structure, tissue composition, and Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent functional Magnetic Resonance imaging (BOLD fMRI) will be used to measure task-dependent and task-independent brain hemodynamic and electrophysiological changes in human subjects with major depressive disorders (MDD).
After being informed about the study and potential risks, all participants giving written informed consent will undergo one session of the cognitive process-based fMRI neurofeedback (CNF) targeting the rumination-related brain functional connectivity, and a one-week follow-up. Participants will be randomized in a double-blind manner (participant and investigator) in a 1:1 ratio to Active (receiving feedback from their own brain activity) or Sham (receiving artificially generated feedback).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
General Exclusion Criteria:
Medical Conditions:
Psychiatric Disorders:
Contraindications for MRI:
Medications:
The session will be done on an individual basis. The active group will receive neurofeedback training from the rumination-related brain functional connectivity.
The session will be done on an individual basis. The sham group will receive neurofeedback training from an artificially generated random feedback signal.
Time frame: Through study completion (average: 2 weeks)
Functional connectivity between precuneus and rTPJ will be calculated and evaluated using fMRI BOLD percent signal change.
Time frame: Through study completion (average: 2 weeks)
The RRS Brooding subscale is a self-report scale to measure brooding ruminative responses. A higher score indicates higher brooding ruminative responses with a maximum score of 20 and a minimum score of 5.
Time frame: Through study completion (average: 2 weeks)
The RRS Depression subscale is a self-report scale to measure depressive ruminative responses. A higher score indicates higher ruminative responses with a maximum score of 48 and a minimum score of 12.
Time frame: Through study completion (average: 2 weeks)
The RRS Reflection subscale is a self-report scale to measure reflective ruminative responses. A higher score indicates higher ruminative responses with a maximum score of 20 and a minimum score of 5.
Time frame: Through study completion (average: 2 weeks)
The RRS Brooding and Depression subscales are a self-report scale to measure brooding and depressive ruminative responses. A higher score indicates higher ruminative responses with a maximum score of 68 and a minimum score of 17.
Time frame: Through study completion (average: 2 weeks)
The RRS is a self-report scale to measure ruminative responses. A higher score indicates higher ruminative responses with a maximum score of 88 and a minimum score of 22.
Time frame: Through study completion (average: 2 weeks)
The MADRS is an interviewer-rated scale to measure the severity of depressive symptoms. A higher score indicates severer depression with a maximum score of 60 and a minimum score of 0.
Time frame: Through study completion (average: 2 weeks)
The HAMA is an interviewer-rated scale to measure the severity of anxiety symptoms. A higher score indicates severer anxiety with a maximum score of 56 and a minimum score of 0.
Time frame: Through study completion (average: 2 weeks)
The PHQ-9 is a self-report scale to measure depressive symptoms. A higher score indicates severer depressive symptoms with a maximum score of 27 and a minimum score of 0.
Time frame: Through study completion (average: 2 weeks)
The STAI is a self-report scale to measure anxiety symptoms. The higher score indicates the higher anxiety with a maximum score of 80 and a minimum score of 20.
Time frame: Through study completion (average: 2 weeks)
The MCQ-30 is a self-report scale to assess individual differences in five factors important in the metacognitive model of psychological disorders. The five subscales of the MCQ-30 are: cognitive confidence, positive beliefs about worry, cognitive self-consciousness, negative beliefs about uncontrollability of thoughts and danger, and beliefs about the need to control thoughts. The higher scores indicating higher levels of unhelpful metacognitions with a maximum total score of 120 and a minimum score of 30.
Time frame: Through study completion (average: 2 weeks)
The TCQ is a self-report scale to assess the effectiveness of strategies used for the control of unpleasant and unwanted thoughts. The TCQ measures five factors that correspond to different strategies for controlling unwanted thoughts: Distraction; Social Control; Worry; Punishment; and Re-appraisal. The higher scores indicating the effectiveness of strategies for controlling unwanted thoughts with a maximum total score of 120 and a minimum score of 30.
Time frame: Through study completion (average: 2 weeks)
The RSE is a self-report scale to assess global self-worth by measuring both positive and negative feelings about the self. A higher score indicates a higher self-esteem with a maximum score of 30 and a minimum score of 0.
Time frame: Through study completion (average: 2 weeks)
The TEPS is a self-report scale to assess pleasure experience. Anticipatory abstract pleasure reflected the pleasure experienced in anticipation of something more abstract or broad in nature. Consummatory abstract pleasure was related to consummation of emotional experience of something that is more abstract in nature. A lower score indicates a higher anhedonia propensity with a maximum total score of 120 and a minimum score of 25.
Time frame: Through study completion (average: 2 weeks)
The ERQ is a self-report scale to assess how they regulate their emotions. The ERQ measures two emotion regulation strategies: Cognitive reappraisal and Expressive suppression. The higher indicates the greater the use of that particular emotion regulation strategy with a maximum total score of 70 and a minimum score of 10.
Time frame: Through study completion (average: 2 weeks)
The PANAS-X is a self-report scale to assess emotional states. The PANAS-X measures 11 specific affects: Fear, Sadness, Guilt, Hostility, Shyness, Fatigue, Surprise, Joviality, Self-Assurance, Attentiveness, and Serenity. Scores on Joviality could range from 8 to 40, with high scores indicating high happiness. Scores on Fear/Hostility/Guilt/Self-Assurance could range from 6 to 30, with high scores indicating high fear/hostility/guilt/self-assurance. Scores on Sadness could range from 5 to 25, with high scores indicating high happiness/sadness. Scores on Attentiveness/Shyness/Fatigue could range from 4 to 20, with high scores indicating high attentiveness/shyness/fatigue. Scores on Serenity/Surprise could range from 3 to 15, with high scores indicating high serenity/surprise.
Time frame: Through study completion (average: 2 weeks)
The CEQ is the most widely used measure of treatment credibility and expectancy in psychotherapy research. The CEQ will be administered after the full introduction of the intervention rationale and principles and after the experience of the intervention. The items are rated on 9-point scales ranging from 1 (Not at all logical/useful/confident) to 9 (Very logical/useful/confident), with a total score possible range of 6 to 54. A higher score indicates higher treatment credibility and expectancy.
Time frame: Through study completion (average: 2 weeks)
This is a study original questionnaire assessing the blindness and pleasantness. The blindness item is rated from 0 to 10, with a possible range of 0 to 10. The lower score indicates the confidence of the blindness. The pleasantness item is rated from 0 to 10 , with a possible range of 0 to 10. A higher score indicates the pleasantness of the intervention. The challenging/difficulties items are rated from 0 to 10, with a possible total range of 0 to 20. A higher score indicates the challenges/difficulties of the intervention. The two successful items are rated from 0 to 10, with a possible range of 0 to 20. A higher score indicates the subjective evaluation of the success of the intervention. The four mental strategies items are rated from 0 to 10, with a possible range of 0 to 40. A higher score indicates the mental strategies used in the intervention were helpful.
Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Inc.
Other
Acronym: CNF-rumination
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05027113
Alzheimer Disease, Anxiety
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05385289
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Louvain-la-Neuve, Brabant Wallon, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT03900416
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Appleton, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07503093
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Belmont, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details