Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05480982

Cognitive Functional Therapy Compared With Pilates in Elderly Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

There is evidence of three randomized controlled trials that face-to-face CFT reduces disability compared with active interventions for adults with chronic low back pain. The pandemic enabled the popularization of tele rehabilitation around the globe, but there are still no clinical trial testing the effectiveness of Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) via tele rehabilitation for elderly people with chronic low back pain. The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of CFT compared with Pilates, both via tele rehabilitation in elderly patients with chronic low back pain.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

65 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Centro Universitário Augusto Motta

Rio de Janeiro, 22793520, Brazil

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Ney Meziat-Filho, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+55 21 998051386

About this study

This will be a parallel-group randomized controlled trial with intention to treat analysis conducted via tele rehabilitation in Brazil. Two hundreds elderly people with chronic low back pain (except low risk on STartback screening tool) will be randomized to receive CFT (2 individualized sessions and 4-8 group sessions) or group Pilates (6-10 sessions) up to 12 weeks treatment. Participants will be assessed at baseline, post-intervention (12 weeks) 24 and 48 weeks after randomization. The trial will include cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses. Data of quality of life, healthcare costs, patient and family costs, and absenteism costs will be collected. The cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed using disability and pain intensity as outcomes. Costs and quality-adjusted life years will be used to calculate cost-utility.

Three qualitative studies will be conducted during the trial. The first will be performed by means of the interviews with a subsample of the participants before randomization. The aim will be to investigate how elderly people with chronic low back pain perceive their condition. The second will be performed by means of the analysis of a subsample of video recordings of CFT treatments. The aim will be to investigate the narratives of elderly people with chronic low back pain during CFT treatment sessions. The third will be performed after the last follow up by means of an interview with a subsample of participants that received CFT treatment. The aim will be to investigate the perceptions of elderly people with chronic low back pain about the impact of CFT via telerehabilitation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • A main complaint of pain in the area between the 12th rib and buttock crease with or without accompanying non-radicular leg pain;
  • Episode of ongoing low back pain for at least 12 weeks' duration;
  • Presenting to a primary care clinician at least 6 weeks ago for this episode of LBP;
  • Being able to walk independently (with or without aids);
  • Ability to understand Portuguese well enough to be able to fill in the questionnaires.
  • Medium or high risk score on STartback screening tool.

Exclusion criteria

  • Known or suspected red flag disorders like fracture, malignancy/cancer, cauda equina syndrome or progressive neurological disorder, inflammatory or infective diseases of the spine;
  • Suspected radicular pain (dominant leg pain, positive neural tissue provocation tests and/or any two of altered strength, reflexes or sensation for the same nerve root, assessed clinically);
  • Spinal surgery < 6 months previously;
  • Invasive procedures for pain relief (ex: epidural injection, rhizotomy) in the last three months;
  • Scoliosis (if considered the primary cause of pain);
  • Unstable heart conditions;
  • Chikungunya or Dengue virus disease transmitted by mosquitoes;
  • Relevant cognition deficit measured by 10 point cognitive screener, with a cut-off point of less than 8 points, 18 for participants with elementary education, and 26 for participants with secondary and/or higher education;
  • Post Covid-19 sequelae of pain.

Treatment and study plan

Cognitive functional therapy via tele rehabilitation

Behavioral

Participants in the CFT group will be treated by a physiotherapist with seventeen years of clinical experience and that has attended six CFT workshops with three of the international tutors of the method. She has completed 212 hours of training including workshops, patient examinations and a pilot study under the supervision of a physiotherapist with more than seven years of clinical experience in CFT. Another two physiotherapists, one with more than fifteen years and the other with more than ten years of clinical experience, and both with more than 106 hours of CFT training including CFT via tele physiotherapy, will complete the staff.

Pilates via tele rehabilitation

Other

Physiotherapist will have the freedom to judge about the exercises´ progression and the need of adaptation considering both the level of difficulty to perform each exercise according to the original proposal and the individual´s demands. The treating physiotherapists will have at least 2 years of clinical practice in Pilates and clinical experience in Pilates via teleconference.

Primary outcomes

  1. Disability

    Time frame: 12 weeks after randomization

    Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (0-100), higher scores mean worse outcome

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity

    Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization

    Numerical Pain Rating Scale (0-10), higher scores mean a worse outcome

  2. Disability

    Time frame: 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization

    Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (0-100), higher scores mean a worse outcome

  3. Function

    Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization

    Patient Specific Functional Scale (0-10), higher scores mean better outcome

  4. Anxiety

    Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization

    Brief Psychosocial Questions (0-10), higher scores mean a worse outcome

  5. Depression

    Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization

    Brief Psychosocial Questions (0-10),higher scores mean a worse outcome

  6. Catastrophization

    Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization

    Brief Psychosocial Questions (0-10), higher scores mean a worse outcome

  7. Fear of movement

    Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization

    Brief Psychosocial Questions (0-10), higher scores mean a worse outcome

  8. Social isolation

    Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization

    Brief Psychosocial Questions (0-10), higher scores mean a worse outcome

  9. Stress

    Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization

    Brief Psychosocial Questions (0-10), higher scores mean a worse outcome

  10. Sleep disturbance

    Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization

    Subjective Health Complaints Inventory (0-3), higher scores mean a worse outcome

  11. Costs

    Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization

    Assessments of healthcare costs, patients and family costs, and absenteeism costs by a specific questionnaire (total costs in £)

  12. Quality-adjusted life years

    Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization

    SF-6D questionnaire (0-1), higher scores mean a better outcome

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Jessica Fernandez, PhD Student

CONTACT

[email protected]

+5521988778037

Ney Meziat-Filho, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+5521998051386

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centro Universitário Augusto Motta

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Cognitive Functional Therapy Compared With Pilates in Elderly Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Treated Via Telerehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2028
First posted
Jul 29, 2022
Registry last updated
May 7, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.