Centro Universitário Augusto Motta
Rio de Janeiro, 22793520, Brazil
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT05480982
There is evidence of three randomized controlled trials that face-to-face CFT reduces disability compared with active interventions for adults with chronic low back pain. The pandemic enabled the popularization of tele rehabilitation around the globe, but there are still no clinical trial testing the effectiveness of Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) via tele rehabilitation for elderly people with chronic low back pain. The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of CFT compared with Pilates, both via tele rehabilitation in elderly patients with chronic low back pain.
Interested in participating?
Request Info65 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Rio de Janeiro, 22793520, Brazil
Location status: Recruiting
This will be a parallel-group randomized controlled trial with intention to treat analysis conducted via tele rehabilitation in Brazil. Two hundreds elderly people with chronic low back pain (except low risk on STartback screening tool) will be randomized to receive CFT (2 individualized sessions and 4-8 group sessions) or group Pilates (6-10 sessions) up to 12 weeks treatment. Participants will be assessed at baseline, post-intervention (12 weeks) 24 and 48 weeks after randomization. The trial will include cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses. Data of quality of life, healthcare costs, patient and family costs, and absenteism costs will be collected. The cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed using disability and pain intensity as outcomes. Costs and quality-adjusted life years will be used to calculate cost-utility.
Three qualitative studies will be conducted during the trial. The first will be performed by means of the interviews with a subsample of the participants before randomization. The aim will be to investigate how elderly people with chronic low back pain perceive their condition. The second will be performed by means of the analysis of a subsample of video recordings of CFT treatments. The aim will be to investigate the narratives of elderly people with chronic low back pain during CFT treatment sessions. The third will be performed after the last follow up by means of an interview with a subsample of participants that received CFT treatment. The aim will be to investigate the perceptions of elderly people with chronic low back pain about the impact of CFT via telerehabilitation.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants in the CFT group will be treated by a physiotherapist with seventeen years of clinical experience and that has attended six CFT workshops with three of the international tutors of the method. She has completed 212 hours of training including workshops, patient examinations and a pilot study under the supervision of a physiotherapist with more than seven years of clinical experience in CFT. Another two physiotherapists, one with more than fifteen years and the other with more than ten years of clinical experience, and both with more than 106 hours of CFT training including CFT via tele physiotherapy, will complete the staff.
Physiotherapist will have the freedom to judge about the exercises´ progression and the need of adaptation considering both the level of difficulty to perform each exercise according to the original proposal and the individual´s demands. The treating physiotherapists will have at least 2 years of clinical practice in Pilates and clinical experience in Pilates via teleconference.
Time frame: 12 weeks after randomization
Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (0-100), higher scores mean worse outcome
Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization
Numerical Pain Rating Scale (0-10), higher scores mean a worse outcome
Time frame: 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization
Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (0-100), higher scores mean a worse outcome
Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization
Patient Specific Functional Scale (0-10), higher scores mean better outcome
Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization
Brief Psychosocial Questions (0-10), higher scores mean a worse outcome
Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization
Brief Psychosocial Questions (0-10),higher scores mean a worse outcome
Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization
Brief Psychosocial Questions (0-10), higher scores mean a worse outcome
Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization
Brief Psychosocial Questions (0-10), higher scores mean a worse outcome
Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization
Brief Psychosocial Questions (0-10), higher scores mean a worse outcome
Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization
Brief Psychosocial Questions (0-10), higher scores mean a worse outcome
Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization
Subjective Health Complaints Inventory (0-3), higher scores mean a worse outcome
Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization
Assessments of healthcare costs, patients and family costs, and absenteeism costs by a specific questionnaire (total costs in £)
Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization
SF-6D questionnaire (0-1), higher scores mean a better outcome
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Jessica Fernandez, PhD Student
CONTACT
Ney Meziat-Filho, PhD
CONTACT
Centro Universitário Augusto Motta
Other
Cognitive Functional Therapy Compared With Pilates in Elderly Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Treated Via Telerehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07729774
Back Pain, Low Back Pain
Multan, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT05607381
Back Pain, Low Back Pain
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06013878
Back Pain, Biomechanics
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07474610
Back Pain, Core Muscles
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details