Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03114917

Cognitive AppRoaches to coMbatting Suicidality

This is a randomised controlled trial which investigates the effectiveness of CARMS (Cognitive AppRoaches to coMbatting Suicidality) therapy in reducing suicidal thoughts and how well CARMS works in practice within the NHS. The trial will compare two groups of people with psychosis who are using NHS mental health services. One group will carry on with their usual treatment. The other group will be offered 24 weekly sessions of CARMS therapy, plus their usual treatment.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-under-Lyne, United Kingdom

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Estimates show that around 6% of people with experiences of psychosis die by suicide. Many more think about it and attempt suicide. A meta-analysis by the investigators illustrated that psychological therapies are effective in reducing suicidal thoughts and acts in people with psychosis as long as those therapies target suicidal thoughts, intentions and plans, and not the reduction of symptoms of mental illnesses. Based on this work, we have designed a psychological cognitive "talking" therapy (called CARMS) to reduce suicidal thoughts in people with experiences of psychosis which targets the psychological processes thought to underpin the pathways to suicidal thoughts and behaviours. An increasing body of work shows that many people with psychosis experience social isolation, emotional dysregulation, and poor interpersonal problem-solving. These appraisals can then induce and intensify perceptions of being hopeless, trapped and defeated, which in turn leads to suicidal thoughts and acts. CARMS aims to help people find practical ways to change these sorts of perceptions. Two of the investigators' pilot randomised trials have demonstrated that CARMS is feasible and acceptable to people experiencing psychosis and may have the potential to be effective at reducing key suicide outcomes.

Hence, the investigators' next step is to test the efficacy of CARMS in the context of NHS mental health services and also to test whether the underlying psychological mechanisms on which CARMS is based are correct. The investigators will test CARMS using a medium sized randomised controlled trial (RCT), with two arms of CARMS plus treatment as usual versus just treatment as usual. The target sample size is 250, with approximately 125 randomised to each arm of the trial, and an assumption of up to 25% attrition. Hence, the overall recruitment target is up to 333. The investigators will use both quantitative and qualitative methods and analyses to assess CARMS.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • ICD-10 diagnosis of psychosis (i.e. F20 - F29)
  • suicidal thoughts and/or acts in the past three months
  • in contact with mental health services and under the care of a mental health services clinical team (i.e., community or inpatient mental health care teams) with a care coordinator
  • aged 18 or over
  • English-speaking (hence, not needing an interpreter)
  • able to give informed consent as assessed by either a responsible clinician or by trial RAs following the British Psychological Society's guidelines on gaining informed consent (http://www.bps.org.uk/sites/default/files/documents/code_of_human_research_ethics.pdf)

Exclusion criteria

  • dementia, or an organic brain disorder
  • unable to complete assessments due to language barriers
  • currently taking part in a clinical trial.

Treatment and study plan

Cognitive AppRoaches to coMbatting Suicidality (CARMS)

Other

The investigators' psychological therapy is a recovery-focused, structured, time-limited, socio-cognitive intervention. It is based upon the investigators' recently developed treatment manual (Tarrier et al., 2013) and pilot RCTs in the community (Tarrier et al., 2014) and in prison (Tarrier et al., accepted). The intervention modifies negative appraisals of emotional regulation, social support, and interpersonal problem-solving. As a consequence, perceptions of defeat, entrapment, and hopelessness will be improved indirectly. In addition, perceptions of defeat, entrapment, and hopelessness will be worked on directly during the therapy.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline Adult Suicide Ideation Questionnaire score at 6 and 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 month and 12 month follow up

    Suicidal ideation valid measure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline Suicide Probability Scale score at 6 and 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 month and 12 month follow up

    Suicide risk valid measure

  2. Change from Baseline Beck Scale for Suicidal ideation score at 6 and 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 month and 12 month follow up

    Assess an individual's thoughts, attitudes and intentions regarding suicide

  3. Change from Baseline Frequency of suicidal thoughts, plans and acts at 6 and 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 month and 12 month follow up

    Clinical interview to ascertain frequency of suicidal thoughts, plans and acts across six months

  4. Change from Baseline Frequency of Suicide Attempts at 6 and 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 month and 12 month follow up

    Frequency of suicide attempts will be collected from medical records

Other outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline Difficulties in Emotional Regulation Scale score at 6 and 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 month and 12 month follow up

    The questionnaire measures emotional dysregulation

  2. Change from Baseline Social Problem-Solving Inventory score at 6 and 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 month and 12 month follow up

    The questionnaire measures individual's social problem-solving skills

  3. Change from Baseline Social Support Appraisals Scale score at 6 and 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 month and 12 month follow up

    The questionnaire measures individual's appraisals of social support

  4. Change from Baseline Beck Hopelessness Scale score at 6 and 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 month and 12 month follow up

    The questionnaire measures three aspects of hopelessness: feelings about the future, loss of motivation, and expectations

  5. Change from Baseline Defeat and Entrapment scale scores at 6 and 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 month and 12 month follow up

    The questionnaire measures how defeated and trapped individuals feel respectively

  6. Change from Baseline Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale score at 6 and 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 month and 12 month follow up

    Clinical interview to assess symptom severity of individual's experiencing Schizophrenia

  7. Change from Baseline Psychotic Symptoms Ratings Scale (PSYRATS) score at 6 and 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 month and 12 month follow up

    Clinical interview to assess symptoms of psychosis

  8. Change from Baseline Personal and Social Performance Scale score at 6 and 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 month and 12 month follow up

    Clinical interview to assess personal and social functioning in individual's experiencing Schizophrenia

  9. Change from Baseline Calgary Depression Scale score at 6 and 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 month and 12 month follow up

    Clinical interview to assess symptoms of depression in individual's experiencing Schizophrenia

  10. Change from Baseline Frequency and Type of Substance Misuse as measured by the Timeline Follow Back at 6 and 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 month and 12 month follow up

    Clinical interview to ascertain frequency and type of substance misuse over 3 months

  11. Change from Baseline Drug use (self-reported) DAST score at 6 and 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 month and 12 month follow up

    Measure which identifies drug 'abuse'

  12. Change from Baseline Alcohol use (self-reported) AUDIT score at 6 and 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 month and 12 month follow up

    Gold standard measure which identifies alcohol use

  13. Change from Baseline Reasons for substance Use Scale - Alcohol and Drugs scores at 6 and 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 month and 12 month follow up

    Questionnaire measure which identifies individual's reasons for using alcohol and drugs respectively

  14. Change from Baseline Sleep Condition Indicator score at 6 and 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 month and 12 month follow up

    The questionnaire measures insomnia

  15. Current medication for mental health problems as prescribed at baseline assessment time point

    Time frame: Baseline

    Information regarding which anti-psychotic medication, if the medication is atypical, and the dosage will be collected from medical records

  16. Change from Baseline Working Alliance Inventory - short form score at 6 and 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 month and 12 month follow up

    The questionnaire measure the client-therapist therapeutic alliance from the participant's and the therapist's perspective

  17. Change from Baseline EQ-5D score at 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 month follow up

    The questionnaire measures health outcomes

  18. Change from Baseline Client Service Use Receipt Inventory at 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 month follow up

    The questionnaire measures use of services

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Manchester

Other

Collaborators

  • Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
  • Lancaster University

Registry information

Official study title

A Psychological Intervention for Suicide Applied to Patents With Psychosis: the CARMS Trial (Cognitive Approaches to Combatting Suicidality)

Acronym: CARMS

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Apr 14, 2017
Registry last updated
May 10, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.