Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07392515

Cognitive and Physical Recovery After Hip Fracture in Frail Patients Using Digital Rehabilitation Technology

The aim of this study is to evaluate whether integrating a technology-based rehabilitation approach with conventional therapies in the rehabilitation of patients with proximal femoral fracture may be advantageous compared with conventional therapy alone. Specifically, the objective is to assess whether the addition of technology-assisted rehabilitation can improve cognitive function, in addition to motor function and overall abilities, compared with conventional rehabilitation alone. Furthermore, the study intends to explore the feasibility of implementing technology-assisted rehabilitation as a stable and routine component of everyday clinical practice, also considering the perspective of healthcare professionals.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

65 year–89 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

COT - Cure Ortopediche Traumatologiche, Messina, Italy

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This is a national, multicenter, non-profit, post-market interventional longitudinal clinical study designed to evaluate the effectiveness of integrating technology-assisted rehabilitation with conventional rehabilitation in elderly patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation after surgically treated proximal femoral fracture.

Eligible participants aged 65 to 89 years who have undergone surgical treatment for proximal femoral fracture (total hip arthroplasty, partial hip arthroplasty, or intramedullary nailing) and who are clinically stable will be enrolled during their inpatient rehabilitation stay. After enrollment, patients will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment arms: (1) conventional rehabilitation alone (control group) or (2) integrated rehabilitation combining conventional therapy with sensor-based technology-assisted rehabilitation (experimental group). Randomization will be centralized and stratified by center and age group.

The total rehabilitation program consists of 18 sessions delivered over approximately 3-4 weeks, with a frequency of 5-6 sessions per week. Patients in the experimental group will perform approximately one-third of daily rehabilitation sessions using sensor-based digital devices providing real-time visual and auditory feedback, and two-thirds with conventional rehabilitation. Technology-assisted training includes facilitated active joint mobilization, motor and cognitive stimulation tasks, and gait training. The control group will receive conventional rehabilitation only, including assisted joint mobilization, postural re-education, muscle strengthening exercises, and gait training with assistive devices.

Clinical assessments will be performed at baseline (T0) and at the end of the rehabilitation program (T1). Motor performance will be assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, which measures the time required for a participant to stand up from a chair, walk three meters, turn around, walk back, and sit down, as well as the Timed Up and Go Dual Task (TUG Dual Task), which evaluates mobility under simultaneous cognitive or motor task conditions. Additional functional outcomes include the Harris Hip Score, Barthel Index, pain assessed by Numeric Rating Scale, and health-related quality of life assessed by the SF-36. Cognitive status will be assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Blood samples will be collected at T0 and T1 to measure serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels and to analyze the rs6265 (Val66Met) polymorphism.

The primary endpoints are the change in serum BDNF levels and the change in TUG and TUG Dual Task performance from baseline to the end of treatment. Secondary endpoints include changes in functional scores, pain, quality of life, and exploratory analysis of the BDNF genetic polymorphism.

Healthcare professionals involved in the rehabilitation program will also complete the Work-Related Quality of Life (WRQoL) questionnaire to explore the perceived impact of technology-assisted rehabilitation on work-related quality of life.

Statistical analysis will be performed to evaluate differences between the control and experimental groups and changes over time in outcome measures. A p-value < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 65 and 89 years
  • Patients who have undergone one of the following surgical treatments specifically for proximal femur fracture including Total hip arthroplasty (total hip replacement), Partial hip arthroplasty (hemiarthroplasty), Intramedullary nailing
  • Time since surgery not exceeding 15 days
  • Clinical stability
  • Patients admitted to the rehabilitation wards of the centers involved in the study and therefore eligible for rehabilitative therapy.

Exclusion criteria

  • Age > 90 years
  • Age < 65 years
  • Refusal to sign the informed consent form
  • Behavioral or cognitive disorders limiting compliance with the rehabilitative treatment
  • Presence of mechanical instability of the implanted surgical device
  • Clinical instability (e.g., sepsis, severe anemia, cardiorespiratory failure) or pre-existing comorbidities affecting ambulation (neurological diseases or chronic pre-existing disabilities)
  • Concomitant presence of other fractures that prevent the possibility of carrying out a rehabilitative treatment
  • Severe visual impairments not correctable with lenses that prevent the patient from performing the treatment using digital tools
  • Pre-existing motor disability prior to the femur fracture due to other systemic diseases (e.g., advanced-stage neurodegenerative diseases, severe heart failure)
  • Conditions contraindicating the use of sensors (pacemaker, epilepsy, skin lesions, open wounds, and severe allergies in areas of contact with the devices).

Treatment and study plan

Experimental intervention - integrated treatment with a sensor-based device

Device

The technology/robotic group will perform one-third (1/3) of the daily rehabilitation using technology-assisted devices and two-thirds (2/3) using conventional rehabilitation. In addition to the conventional rehabilitation described below, the treatment will include technology-assisted rehabilitation consisting of facilitated active joint mobilization exercises with visual and auditory feedback, aimed at stimulating motor and cognitive functions, as well as gait training.

Conventional rehabilitation intervention

Other

The conventional rehabilitation programme includes assisted and facilitated joint mobilization exercises to improve range of motion; exercises for postural readaptation of the trunk to the upright position; isometric exercises; and gait training using a 4-wheeled walker or forearm crutches (Canadian crutches), aimed at improving walking ability and achieving an appropriate recovery of the gait pattern.

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in serum BDNF levels

    Time frame: Baseline and within 3 days after completion of the rehabilitative treatment

    Difference in serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels between baseline and the end of the rehabilitative treatment, assessed to evaluate biomolecular changes associated with neuroplasticity.

  2. Change in Timed Up and Go test

    Time frame: Baseline and within 3 days after completion of the rehabilitative treatment

    Difference in functional mobility, balance, and gait performance assessed using the Timed Up and Go test between baseline and end of rehabilitative treatment.

  3. Change in Timed Up and Go Dual Task test

    Time frame: Baseline and within 3 days after completion of the rehabilitative treatment

    Difference in cognitive-motor dual-task performance assessed using the Timed Up and Go Dual Task test between baseline and end of rehabilitative treatment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in the Harris Hip Score (HHS)

    Time frame: Baseline and within 3 days after completion of the rehabilitative treatment

    Change in hip function, pain, and functional ability as assessed by the Harris Hip Score, a clinician-administered outcome measure ranging from 0 to 100 points, where higher scores indicate better hip function, assessed at baseline and at the end of the rehabilitative treatment.

  2. Change in the modified Barthel Index

    Time frame: Baseline and within 3 days after completion of the rehabilitative treatment

    Change in independence in activities of daily living as assessed by item-level scores of the Barthel Index, a validated measure of functional independence ranging from 0 to 100 points, where higher scores indicate greater independence, assessed at baseline and at the end of the rehabilitative treatment (Italian version, 2015).

  3. Change in pain intensity measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Time frame: Baseline and within 3 days after completion of the rehabilitative treatment

    Change in pain intensity as assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale, a patient-reported outcome measure ranging from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate greater pain intensity, assessed at baseline and at the end of the rehabilitative treatment.

  4. Change in quality of life measured by the SF-36

    Time frame: Baseline and within 3 days after completion of the rehabilitative treatment

    Change in health-related quality of life as assessed by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), a validated patient-reported outcome measure composed of multiple domains, each scored on a 0 to 100 scale, where higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life, assessed at baseline and at the end of the rehabilitative treatment.

  5. Analysis of the rs6265 polymorphism (Val66Met mutation) of the BDNF gen

    Time frame: Baseline

    Genotyping of the BDNF rs6265 (Val66Met; G196A) single-nucleotide polymorphism to classify participants as Val/Val, Val/Met, or Met/Met and explore its association with serum BDNF levels and rehabilitative outcomes.

  6. Healthcare professionals' perspective on work-related quality of work in the two different treatment approaches.

    Time frame: At the end of treatment delivery for both interventions

    Assessment of healthcare professionals' work-related quality of life using the Work-Related Quality of Life Scale (WRQoL).

    The WRQoL total score ranges from 23 to 115, with higher scores indicating better perceived work-related quality of life.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

C.O.T. Cure Ortopediche Traumatologiche S.p.A.

Other

Collaborators

  • Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS

Registry information

Official study title

Cognitive and Motor Recovery in Frail Patients With Hip Fracture: Effectiveness of Digital Technology-Assisted Rehabilitation and Analysis of Biomolecular Mechanisms

Acronym: FEWF

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Feb 6, 2026
Registry last updated
Mar 13, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.