Skipping lunch
OtherJust water.
NCT Number: NCT01401153
Major aim of this study is to add scientifically proven insights into cognitive effects of meals to the existing recommendations for school meals in Germany. As a first step the short-term effects of skipping lunch on children's cognitive functioning in the afternoon will be examined in a cross-over trial. The study is conducted in a large comprehensive school in Gelsenkirchen (Germany) including about 150 children.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me10 year–15 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Because of cerebral particularities, children may react sensitive to short-term variations of nutrient supply. Therefore, an optimised composition of meals at nutritionally favourable mealtime should be considered for optimal cognitive performance. The increasing implementation of all-day schools in Germany requires the children's catering at school. However, also the number of 'meal skippers' is increasing among children. Thus, the effect of skipping of the midday meal at school on cognitive functioning is examined in this experimental cross-over trial.
As prior intake of food can have an influence on the physiological effect of test meal, the children's dietary intake in the morning is standardized. The intervention is integrated in the usual everyday school life:
9.15 a.m. standardized snack within the frame of the regular break, 9.45 a.m. to 12.25 p.m. everyday school life, 12.25 p.m. either lunch (control) or only a non-caloric beverage (intervention of 'skipping meal'), 12.45 p.m. to 1.15 p.m. regular lunch break, 1.15 p.m. computerized tests of cognitive functioning, 2 p.m. lunch for the 'skipping meal'-group.
Parameters of cognition with relevance to everyday school life are measured by a computerized test battery of the 'Wiener Testsystem'. Usual eating behaviour, sleep behaviour, physical activity, parental education and migration background are determined as control variables by questionnaires for children, parents and teachers. Beside the Body Mass Index, the individual IQ is measured by a paper-pencil-test.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Just water.
Time frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Mean reaction time to response to a simple visual stimulus without a preceding warning signal
Time frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Deviation of reaction time --> logarithmic standard deviation of the reaction times
Time frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Reactions when no stimulus had been presented
Time frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Stimuli to which no reaction follows within 1.5s
Time frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Longest sequence correctly reproduced in at least two of three items (the test is a task of reproducing prescribed sequences from two to eight blocks)
Time frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Number of sequences incorrectly reproduced
Time frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Number of sequences correctly reproduced
Time frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Sequences including all the blocks of a prescribed sequence, but in the wrong order
Time frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Number of total reactions (Subjects have to decide whether a displayed figure is identical with one of four figures shown or not)
Time frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Percentage of incorrect reactions
Time frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Number of correct reactions
Time frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Number of incorrect reactions
Time frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Mean time to react correctly
Time frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Mean time to react incorrectly
Research Institute of Child Nutrition, Dortmund
Other
Cross-over Trial Determining the Short-term Effects of Lunch on Children's Cognitive Functioning
Acronym: CogniDO
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06690619
Cognition - Other, Strength Outcomes
Canfield, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04901390
Cognition - Other, Gastrointestinal Dysfunction
Urbana, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04187950
Cognition - Other, Gastrointestinal Dysfunction
Urbana, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00881764
Cognition - Other
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details