Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06841432

Coblation Versus Suction Diathermy in Pediatric Adenoidectomy

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two surgical procedures in endoscopic adenoidectomy including Coblation and Suction diathermy

. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the Coblation device have less time, less pain, less postoperative crustation and bad odor, less intraoperative bleeding, and less recurrence?

Participants will:

will undergo both procedures every day for 6 months Visit the clinic once every 2 weeks for checkups and tests Keep a diary of their symptoms

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

2 year–18 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Alazhar university Hopital in Assiut

Asyut, Egypt

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • all patients aged 2 to 18 years
  • patients who had isolated adenoid hypertrophy
  • patients' hemoglobin levels above 10 mg/dl

Exclusion criteria

  • those with recent upper respiratory tract infections, evidence of bleeding disorders, serous otitis media, chronic tonsillitis
  • those advised against undergoing adenoidectomy after consulting a phoniatrist
  • patients with atrophic rhinitis those with nasal obstruction caused by other nasal or paranasal conditions such as inferior turbinate hypertrophy, Choanal atresia, deviated nasal septum, antrochoanal polyps, and other causes of nasal obstruction in children.

Treatment and study plan

adenoidectomy using coblatioion

Procedure

One hundred and five patients underwent a Coblation-assisted adenoidectomy procedure. The child was positioned in Rose's position, which helped retract the soft palate and improve visibility of the nasopharynx. Two soft rubber catheters were inserted into the patient's mouth, with the distal and proximal ends crossed externally and secured with a clamp. The COBLATOR™ II surgery system Model EC8000-01 was used, with a power setting of nine for ablation and five for coagulation. Under general anesthesia, the adenoidectomy was performed using either a 4 mm, 70-degree angled endoscope inserted orally or a zero-degree endoscope inserted through the nose, providing effective visualization of the nasopharynx. After the procedure, hemostasis was achieved by using a combination of the coagulation and ablation modes.

adenoidectomy by Suction diathermy

Procedure

One hundred and five patients underwent a suction diathermy adenoidectomy procedure. The soft palate was gently retracted using two suction catheters, allowing a 70-degree angled endoscope (Storz, Germany) placed in the oropharynx to provide a clear view of the adenoidal tissue and surrounding structures in the nasopharynx. Using a malleable size 10 or 12 French hand-switching suction coagulator, the adenoidal tissue was carefully ablated, starting from the uppermost part. The procedure was completed when the posterior choanae were clearly visible, and the nasopharynx had a smooth, unobstructed appearance. Great care was taken to avoid injuring the Eustachian tube orifice, posterior septum, choanae, inferior turbinate, palate, and posterior pharyngeal wall. Continuous irrigation with saline, either through the mouth or the nose, helped minimize any thermal damage caused by the diathermy machine.

Primary outcomes

  1. Operative duration

    Time frame: During the procedure

    The procedure, from the initial insertion of the Bowel-Davis mouth gag to the complete removal of the adenoid and the gag, was timed in minutes.

  2. Intraopertive blood loss

    Time frame: during the procedures

    Boezaart surgical field grading scale was used to evaluate the intraoperative bleeding

  3. Postopertaive Pain

    Time frame: Patients reported their pain levels every day before taking any pain medication during the 7 days after their surgery

    The Wong-Baker Pain Scale consists of 6 faces depicting different levels of pain. Face 1 represents no pain, Face 2 indicates a little bit of hurt, Face 3 indicates a little more hurt, Face 4 indicates even more hurt, Face 5 indicates a whole lot of hurt, and Face 6 indicates the worst possible hurt, with pain scores ranging from 0 to 10. Both the children and their parents were informed about the purpose of the questionnaires and how to fill them out before the surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Development of bad breath

    Time frame: from the end of operation till 2 weeks post operation

    frequency of Children who presented with bad breath

  2. recovery time

    Time frame: three months post opertaive

    time which was talken for the patients to resume their normal social routines

  3. secondary bleeding

    Time frame: up to one month surgery

    frequency of Children who presented with bleeding that occurred after 24 hrs of operation

  4. Pre- and post-adenoid size grading

    Time frame: preintervention (one day before opertaion ) and postintervention (up to three months)

    The Parikh grading system (1-4) is used to assess the extent of adenoid tissue contact with surrounding structures: Grade 1 - adenoid tissue not in contact, Grade 2 - adenoid tissue in contact with Eustachian tube cushions, Grade 3 - adenoid tissue in contact with vomer, Grade 4 - adenoid tissue in contact with soft palate

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Al-Azhar University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Endoscopic Coblation Versus Suction Diathermy in Pediatric Adenoidectomy: Randomized Clinical Trial

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Feb 24, 2025
Registry last updated
Feb 24, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.