Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01961622

Closing the Loop in Adults With Sub-optimally Controlled Type 1 Diabetes Under Free Living Conditions

The main objective of this study is to determine whether day and night closed-loop insulin delivery for 12 weeks under free living conditions is superior to addition of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes and sub-optimal glucose control on insulin pump therapy.

This is an open-label, multi centre, randomised, crossover design study, involving a 6 to 8 week run-in period, during which glucose control will be optimised by a professional pump educator, followed by two 3 months study periods during which glucose levels will be controlled either by an automated closed-loop system or by subjects usual insulin pump therapy augmented with real-time continuous glucose monitoring in random order. A total of up to 42 adults (aiming for 30 completed subjects) aged 18 years and older with T1D on insulin pump therapy will be recruited through diabetes clinics and other established methods in participating centres. Subjects who drop out of the study within the first 6 weeks of the first intervention arm will be replaced.

Subjects will receive appropriate training in the safe use of closed-loop insulin delivery system. Subjects will have regular contact with the study team during the home study phase including 24/7 telephone support. Subjects will be discouraged from international travel during the first two weeks of closed-loop use.

The primary outcome is time spent in target range between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L as recorded by CGM (adjusted for potential over-estimation) during home stay. Secondary outcomes are the HbA1c, time spent with glucose levels above and below target, as recorded by CGM, and other CGM-based metrics.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The subject has type 1 diabetes as defined by WHO
  • The subject is 18 years of age or older
  • The subject will have been on an insulin pump for at least 6 months with good knowledge of insulin self-adjustment including carbohydrate counting
  • The subject is treated with one of the rapid acting insulin analogues (Insulin Aspart, Insulin Lispro or Insulin Glulisine)
  • HbA1c ≥7.5% (58mmol/mmol) and ≤ 10% (86 mmol/mmol) based on analysis from central laboratory or equivalent
  • The subject is willing to perform regular finger-prick blood glucose monitoring, with at least 6 measurements per day
  • The subject is willing to wear closed-loop system at home and at work place
  • The subject is willing to follow study specific instructions
  • The subject is willing to upload pump and CGM data at regular intervals
  • Female subjects of child bearing age should be on effective contraception and must have a negative urine-HCG pregnancy test at screening. In addition in Germany, women of childbearing potential must use a highly effective method of birth control, which is defined as those which result in a low failure rate (i.e. less than 1% per year) and must use two independent methods of contraception, e.g. diaphragm and spermicide-coated condom.

Exclusion criteria

  • Non-type 1 diabetes mellitus
  • Any other physical or psychological disease or condition likely to interfere with the normal conduct of the study and interpretation of the study results
  • Current treatment with drugs known to have significant interference with glucose metabolism, such as systemic corticosteroids, as judged by the investigator
  • Known or suspected allergy against insulin
  • Subjects with clinically significant nephropathy, neuropathy or proliferative retinopathy as judged by the investigator
  • Significantly reduced hypoglycaemia awareness as judged by the investigator
  • More than one episode of severe hypoglycaemia as defined by American Diabetes Association (31) in preceding 6 months (Severe hypoglycaemia is defined as an event requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrates, glucagon, or take other corrective actions).
  • Random C-peptide > 100pmol/l with concomitant plasma glucose >4 mM(72 mg/dl)
  • Total daily insulin dose > 2 IU/kg/day
  • Subject is pregnant or breast feeding or planning pregnancy in near future (within next 3 months)
  • Severe visual impairment
  • Severe hearing impairment
  • Subjects using implanted internal pacemaker
  • Lack of reliable telephone facility for contact
  • Subject not proficient in English (UK) or German (Germany and Austria)
  • Subjects who are living alone

Additional exclusion criteria specific for Austria and Germany

  • Positive results on urine drug screen (amphetamines/metamphetamines, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, cannabinoids, cocaine, opiates).
  • Positive alcohol breath test.

Additional exclusion criteria specific for Germany only

  • Positive reaction to any of the following tests: hepatitis B surface (HBs) antigen, anti-hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) antibodies, anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 1 antibodies, anti-HIV2 antibodies.
  • Significantly reduced hypoglycaemia awareness withGold score ≥ 4 according to Geddes J et al, Diabetes Care 2007
  • Serious macro- and microangiopathy
  • Serious anomalies of the skin
  • Serious skin diseases (e.g. psoriasis vulgaris, bacterial skin diseases) located at places of the body, which potentially are possible to be used for localisation of the glucose sensor)
  • Renal insufficiency
  • Epilepsy
  • Eating disorders (like bulimia or anorexia nervosa)
  • Disorders of the lipid metabolism
  • Blood transfusion requiring patients
  • Psychiatric diseases and related conditions
  • Patients with frequent catheter abscesses having occurred in connection with the pump therapy
  • Patients with medically documented allergy towards the adhesive (glue) of plasters
  • Abnormal blood values for:
  • the creatinine clearance,
  • erythropoietin,
  • TSH.
  • Patients with the following concomitant medications or misuse of substances:
  • steroids,
  • anticoagulant therapies.
  • Patients with a planned intervention under general anaesthesia.
  • Patients who do shift work

Treatment and study plan

Florence D2A or similar closed loop glucose control system

Device

Subject's glucose level will be controlled by the Florence D2A or similar automated closed loop glucose control system. The system comprises of FreeStyle Navigator 2 ® Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) System (Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, CA, USA), Dana R Diabecare subcutaneous insulin infusion pump (Sooil Corp. Seoul, South Korea)or similar insulin pump, and MPC-based glucose control algorithm running on a smartphone

CSII with real-time CGM

Device

Subject glucose level controlled by usual insulin pump therapy in conjunction with real time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)

Primary outcomes

  1. Time spent in the target glucose range from 3.9 to 10.0 mmol/l based on subcutaneous glucose monitoring

    Time frame: 90 days

    Time spent in the target glucose range from 3.9 to 10.0 mmol/l based on subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) during the 90 days of home stay. Intention to treat basis.

Secondary outcomes

  1. HbA1c

    Time frame: 90 days

    Measure of average glycaemic control during study period

  2. Insulin dose

    Time frame: 90 days

    Total, basal and bolus insulin dose during 90 days of home periods

  3. Adverse Events

    Time frame: 10 months

    Safety evaluation will comprise the number of episodes of hypoglycaemia, significant ketonemia (> 3.0mmol/l)as well as nature and severity of any other adverse events

  4. Utility Evaluation

    Time frame: 90 days

    Utility evaluation is the frequency and duration of use of the closed-loop system at home and time between failures of closed-loop system components.

  5. Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome

    Time frame: 90 days

    Time spent above and below the target glucose 3.9 to 10.0 mmol/l, during the 90 days of home periods

  6. Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome

    Time frame: 90 days

    Average,standard deviation and coefficient of variation of glucose levels during 90 days of home periods

  7. Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome

    Time frame: 90 days

    The time with glucose levels < 3.5 mmol/l and <2.8 mmol/l during 90 days of home periods

  8. Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome

    Time frame: 90 days

    The time with glucose levels in the significant hyperglycaemia,(glucose levels > 16.7 mmol/l during 90 days of home periods

  9. Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome

    Time frame: 90 days

    Low Blood Glucose Index during 90 days of home periods

  10. Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome

    Time frame: 90 days

    Duration of periods when sensor glucose values was below 3.5mmol/l for at least 20 minutes

  11. Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome

    Time frame: 90 days

    The "Area Under the Curve" below 3.5 mmol/l during 90 days home periods

  12. Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome

    Time frame: 90 days

    Between 24 hour period variability: Coefficient of variation of CGM glucose between 24 hour periods (midnight to midnight)

  13. Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome

    Time frame: 90 days

    Glucose concentration in the target range (3.9-10.0mmol/L), and above and below target range based on adjusted CGM. Adjustment described in Hovorka R et. al.; Diabetes Technol Ther 14:1-9, 2012

  14. Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome during overnight period between 23:00 and 08:00

    Time frame: 90 days

    Time spent with CGM glucose concentration in the target range (3.9-8.0mmol/L), Mean CGM glucose levels, The AUC below 3.5mmol/l, CV of CGM glucose levels, Coefficient of variation of CGM glucose between nights and Total insulin dose during overnight period between 23:00 and 08:00

  15. Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome during day period between 08:00 to 23:00

    Time frame: 90 days

    Time spent with CGM glucose concentration in the target range (3.9-10.0mmol/L), Mean CGM glucose levels, The AUC below 3.5mmol/l, CV of CGM glucose levels, Coefficient of variation of CGM glucose between days and Total insulin dose during day period between 08:00 to 23:00

Other outcomes

  1. Accuracy of CGM

    Time frame: 90 days

    CGM accuracy during 3 months home period; Capillary glucose vs. CGM will be evaluated using standard measures of numerical and clinical accuracy including absolute relative deviation and error grid analysis

  2. Per Protocol Analysis

    Time frame: 90 days

    Per protocol analysis will be conducted to explore the relationship between usage of study treatments and study outcomes.

  3. Effect of study intervention based on pre-study glycaemic control

    Time frame: 90 days

    Following outcomes will be calculated separately for participants with baseline HbA1c <8.5% vs. ≥ 8.5%

    Time spent with CGM glucose concentration in the target range (3.9-10.0mmol/L), Time spent with CGM glucose levels in hypoglycaemic range (< 3.9 mmol/L), Time spent with CGM glucose levels in hyperglycaemic range (> 10.0 mmol/L), Mean CGM glucose levels and the AUC below 3.5mmol/l based on continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Cambridge

Other

Collaborators

  • Medical University of Graz
  • Profil Institut für Stoffwechselforschung GmbH

Registry information

Official study title

An Open-label, Multi-centre, Randomised, Two-period, Crossover Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Utility of 12 Week Day and Night Automated Closed-loop Glucose Control Under Free Living Conditions Compared to Conventional Insulin Pump Therapy Combined With Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes With Sub-optimal Glucose Control

Acronym: AP@home04

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Oct 11, 2013
Registry last updated
Jun 8, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.