Scripps Clinic Torrey Pines
La Jolla, California, 92037, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
David B Hiller, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Julie C McCauley
CONTACT
Roslyn M Kackman
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT06421350
The primary purpose of this study is to determine the differences in response to treatment of complex regional pain syndrome with a closed-loop spinal cord stimulator if applied in the early phases (acute or subacute) versus the chronic phase.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
La Jolla, California, 92037, United States
Location status: Recruiting
David B Hiller, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Julie C McCauley
CONTACT
Roslyn M Kackman
CONTACT
After being informed about the study and the potential risks, all patients given written informed consent will be organized into group 1 (acute or subacute) and group 2 (chronic). They will undergo a trial period with a temporary spinal cord stimulator for 7 days. After the trial period, if the provider determines the device improved the patient's pain and function, the permanent device will be implanted. The patient will fill out an outcomes packet at baseline, end of trial period, 3 months and 6 months. There will also be a blood draw to evaluate prolactin levels, which are associated with stress and pain, at baseline, end of trial period, and 3 months.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The closed-loop spinal cord stimulation mechanism uses dynamic adjusting stimulation parameters based on real-time physiologic response and is uniquely positioned to mitigate the aberrant inflammatory and neurosensory processing and autonomic dysfunction driving CRPS and its progression between phases.
Time frame: Baseline, 7 day trial period, 3 months, 6 months
(CRPS SS) This will be determined at baseline by the provider based on his diagnosis of the patient's condition, being acute and subacute or chronic. This is based on the presence or absence of 16 clinically-assessed signs and symptoms, and complements the diagnostic criteria for CRPS. A higher score indicates greater severity of the condition. This will be followed up at the 7 day trial period, 3 months and 6 months post procedure by evaluation.
Time frame: 7 day trial period, 3 months, and 6 months.
Spinal cord stimulation device parameters will be collected to determine if a lower voltage is required to treat acute phase of complex regional pain syndrome as compared to later phases. This will be conducted at follow up visits and analyzed by the medical device representative. The data will be pulled and analyzed to determine the activation point for each patient. This will be captured at the 7 day trial period, 3 months, and 6 months.
Time frame: Baseline, 7 day trial period, and 3 months
We plan to include a physiological marker of pain response by assessing serum prolactin levels, which are linked to dopamine levels in the brain. We will use prolactin as a convenient marker of abnormal dopamine levels due to chronic pain and the response to spinal cord stimulation treatment as an objective quantifiable metric of success with treatment. We will collect this via blood draw at our lab at baseline, at the 7 day trial period, and 3 months.
Time frame: Baseline, 7 day trial period, 3 months, and 6 months
(VAS) This will be used to determine the pain intensity the patient is experiencing. It will be on a scale from 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain.
Time frame: Baseline, 7 day trial period, 3 months, and 6 months
(EQ-5D-5L) Used to capture quality of life across 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. A lower score would indicate a severe score and the patient has a low quality of life. The patient also rates how good or bad their health is on a scale of 0-100, 100 being the best health and 0 being the worst health they could imagine.
Time frame: Baseline, 7 day trial period, 3 months, and 6 months
(PROMIS-29v2.1) Used to assess pain intensity using a single 0-10 numeric rating item and seven health domains: physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance.
Time frame: Baseline, 7 day trial period, 3 months and 6 months.
(GAD-7) Used for the screening and severity measuring of generalized anxiety disorder. It consists of seven items the patients rate based on their experiences over the past two weeks. Each item is scored from 0 (none) to 3 (every day). The cumulative score, ranging from 0-21, indicates the severity of GAD symptoms, with higher scores corresponding to greater anxiety levels.
Time frame: Baseline, 7 day trial period, 3 months, 6 months
(PHQ-9) Used for screening and measuring the severity of depression. A higher score would indicate the patient has a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, 7 day trial period, 3 months, 6 months
(SF-MPQ-2) Used to rate the intensity of each type of pain and related symptoms. A higher score means the patient has a worse outcome. They rate their pain and symptoms on a scale of 0-10, with a 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain.
Time frame: Baseline, 7 day trial period, 3 months, 6 months
(PCS) Used to assess catastrophic thinking related to pain among adults with or without chronic pain. A higher score would mean the patient has a worse outcome.
Time frame: 7 day trial period, 3 months and 6 months
(PGIC) Used to measure the patient's belief about the effectiveness of the treatment. A higher score would reflect the patient believes the treatment is not effective and they have been doing much worse.
Time frame: Baseline, 7 day trial period, 3 months and 6 months
Used to track amount of pain medication taken by the patient on a daily basis or what they are taking and when they are taking it.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Julie C McCauley
CONTACT
Roslyn M Kackman
CONTACT
Scripps Health
Other
Efficacy of Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03137472
Autonomic Nervous System Diseases, Complex Regional Pain Syndromes
Redwood City, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05689944
Autonomic Nervous System Diseases, Brain Diseases
Bron, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05814497
Autonomic Nervous System Diseases, Chronic Pain
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06453447
Arm Injuries, Autonomic Nervous System Diseases
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
View Trial Details