Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02750267

Closed-Loop Control in Young Children 5-8 Years Old Using DiAs Platform

The overall aim of this proposed research is to determine the safety, feasibility and efficacy (AP vs at home use of SAP) of the Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) controller in day and night closed-loop control in young children 5-8 years old with type 1 diabetes over multiple 48 hours in an out-patient setting.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

5 year–9 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology

Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903, United States

About this study

Young children with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) in the age range of 5-8 years old are a population with clear needs but unique challenges regarding the application of artificial pancreas (AP) technologies. Young children are likely to benefit from an AP system, with current deficits in glycemic control that include both significant hypoglycemia and sub-optimal HbA1c levels; however, they have undeveloped abilities to control and interact with the AP system, posing potential safety issues. During the hours that these children are away from their parents at school and elsewhere, they lack the sophistication to operate the currently-available tools in an AP system--and may induce harm if they are allowed to do so, causing parental resistance to AP use. Commercially-available insulin pumps have mechanisms to lock access to children to prevent inappropriate insulin-delivery. However, the AP is more complex than an insulin pump, both in requiring more detailed setting information (that a child could adversely alter) and in providing alerts for impending low- and high-blood glucose (BG) levels (that one wouldn't want to lock out to child use). These functions are all run via a platform on a smart phone-a device with which young children may already feel a high degree of familiarity and thus be more likely to attempt to explore and potentially change settings. It is likely that young children will benefit the most from a system that gives them access to some AP features but provides access to other features only for their parents. In this sense, young children require a device that is not user-centered as much as family-centered. A redesign of the system to provide appropriate access to AP tools-in which certain users can obtain access to certain functionalities-is direly needed before children in this age range can benefit from the improvements in blood glucose (BG) control that the AP has to offer.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes,
  • The diagnosis of type 1 diabetes is based on the investigator's judgment
  • C peptide levels and antibody determinations are not required
  • Daily insulin therapy for ≥ 12 months
  • Insulin pump therapy for ≥ 3 months
  • Age ≥5 - ≤8 years old
  • Avoidance of acetaminophen-containing medications (i.e. Tylenol) while wearing the continuous glucose monitor.
  • Willingness to wear a continuous glucose sensor and physiological monitor for the duration of the study

Exclusion criteria

The presence of any of the following is an exclusion for the study:

  • Diabetic ketoacidosis in the past month
  • Hypoglycemic seizure or loss of consciousness in the past 3 months
  • History of seizure disorder (except for hypoglycemic seizure)
  • History of any heart disease including coronary artery disease, heart failure, or arrhythmias
  • Cystic fibrosis
  • Current use of oral glucocorticoids, beta-blockers or other medications, which in the judgment of the investigator would be a contraindication to participation in the study.
  • History of ongoing renal disease (other than microalbuminuria).
  • Subjects requiring intermediate or long-acting insulin (such as NPH, Detemir or Glargine).
  • Subjects requiring other anti-diabetic medications other than insulin (oral or injectable).
  • Presence of a febrile illness within 24 hours of admission or acetaminophen use while wearing the CGM. The subject may be rescheduled for Research House/Hotel Admission if these criteria are not met. The study subject will not participate in the trial if these conditions are met.
  • Medical or psychiatric condition that in the judgment of the investigator might interfere with the completion of the protocol such as:
  • Inpatient psychiatric treatment in the past 6 months
  • Uncontrolled adrenal insufficiency

Treatment and study plan

Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) with Closed-Loop

Device

All subjects will use DiAs Medical Platform, a study insulin pump and continuous glucose monitor (CGM) in closed-loop mode during a Research House/Hotel admission that will last up to 72 hours.

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent of Sensor Glucose Readings Between 70-180 mg/dL

    Time frame: 68 hours

    All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percent of Time Sensor Glucose Readings Are <70 mg/dL

    Time frame: 68 hours

    All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.

  2. Percent of Time Sensor Glucose Readings Are >150 mg/dL

    Time frame: 72 hours

    All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.

  3. Percent of Time Sensor Glucose Readings Are >180 mg/dL

    Time frame: 68 hours

    All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.

  4. Percent of Time Sensor Glucose Readings Are >250 mg/dL

    Time frame: 68 hours

    All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.

  5. Percent of Time Sensor Glucose Readings Are >400 mg/dL

    Time frame: 72 hours

    All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.

  6. Distribution of Sensor and Meter Glucose Values (Maximum, Minimum, Median, Interquartile Range, Mean, Standard Deviation)

    Time frame: 72 hours

    All subjects have CGM and handheld glucose meter output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.

  7. Distribution of Sensor and Meter Glucose Values (Maximum)

    Time frame: 72 hours

    All subjects have CGM and handheld glucose meter output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.

  8. Distribution of Sensor and Meter Glucose Values (Minimum)

    Time frame: 72 hours

    All subjects have CGM and handheld glucose meter output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.

  9. Distribution of Sensor and Meter Glucose Values (Median/Interquartile Range)

    Time frame: 72 hours

    All subjects have CGM and handheld glucose meter output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.

  10. Mean BG (as Measured by CGM)

    Time frame: 68 hours

    All subjects have CGM and handheld glucose meter output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.

  11. Hypoglycemia Area Under the Curve <60

    Time frame: 72 hours

    All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.

  12. Hypoglycemia Area Under the Curve <70 mg/dL

    Time frame: 72 hours

    All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.

  13. Hyperglycemia Area Under the Curve >180

    Time frame: 72 hours

    All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.

  14. Hyperglycemia Area Under the Curve >250 mg/dL

    Time frame: 72 hours

    All subjects have CGM output analyzed and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.

  15. Incidence of Hypoglycemia Per Subject, Defined by Handheld Meter Glucose <70 mg/dL

    Time frame: 68 hours

    All subjects have hypoglycemia monitored by meter analysis and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.

  16. End of Night Blood Glucose

    Time frame: 72 hours

    All subjects have blood glucose evaluated upon rising (approximately 7 am) and compared between time on closed-loop system and time on usual care period.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Virginia

Other

Collaborators

  • DexCom, Inc.

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Apr 25, 2016
Registry last updated
Jul 24, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.