Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04396691

Clinimetric and Instrumental Characterization of Fighter Pilots With Flight-related Neck Pain.

The objective of the study is to detect the state of clinical and instrumental factors related in fighter pilots with non-specific mechanical neck pain.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Universidad de Extremadura

Badajoz, 06006, Spain

About this study

A prevalence study (descriptive, observational, cross-sectional) was carried out, in which clinimetric variables (range of active cervical movement, motor control and electrical activity), perceived pain (using NSMNP and algometry) and disability were evaluated. The sample (n = 18) is divided into instructors (n = 7) and students (n = 11). The objective of this study is to characterize descriptively at the sociodemographic level and to know the state of health in relation to clinimetric variables of the fighter pilots of the Talavera la Real air base (Badajoz) to determine the risk of developing an neck injury.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Numerical pain rating scale. Participants rated the intensity of their neck pain at rest on an 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), where 0 was no pain and 10 maximum pain .The pilots airforce were asked to indicate the pain levels that they experienced when they wake up in the morning. Cleland et al reported that the minimal detectable change (MDC) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the numeric pain rating scale were 1.3 and 2.1 points, respectively, in patients with mechanical neck pain.
  • Joint Position Sense. This test assesses the ability to relocate the head to its natural posture, and is a test of cervical proprioception. It consists of a visual measurement of error in moving the head to the initial neutral position after active cervical rotation. If the average difference between the initial and final position is equivalent to an error of 4.5 degrees, it is considered abnormal and the subject could be included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • Cervical pain that occurs with irradiation to the upper limbs and / or radiculopathy.
  • Cervical spine surgery.
  • Have received physical therapy treatment six weeks prior to data collection.
  • Being involved in an on-going medico-legal dispute.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Range of movement

    Time frame: 1 week

    For the evaluation of cervical ROM, we will use a conventional two-branch goniometer, from the EnrafNonius® brand. Subjects will be placed in a sitting position on a stool, with a neutral neck and head position. The range of active cervical mobility presented by the patients was measured in reference to the three planes of the space. In the sagittal plane, the degrees of mobility to flexion and extension were measured, in the frontal plane the right and left inclinations, and in the transverse plane both rotations.

  2. Disability

    Time frame: 1 week

    The degree of cervical disability involvement was measured through the Neck Disability Index (NDI), translated into Spanish, presenting optimum reliability and internal validity. It consists of 10 sections, 4 of them are related to subjective symptoms and the other 6 are related to basic activities of daily life.

    Each of the sections presents 6 possible responses, scoring these from 0 to 5 according to progression of functional disability.

    Scores less than 5 points indicate non-disability, between 5-14 points indicates mild disability, values between 30-48 points moderate disability, between 50-64 points severe disability and those that exceed 70 points represent complete disability.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pressure pain thresholds

    Time frame: 1 week

    A mechanical pressure Fisher algometer (Force Dial model FDK 40) with a 1 cm² area contact head was used to measure the pressure pain threshold. The reliability of pressure algometry has been found to be high [intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.97)]. With the participant in supine, the pressure pain threshold of the the myofascial trigger point nº2 of the upper trapezius muscle according to Travell and Simons and the central trigger point of the sternocleidomastoid muscle was bilaterally evaluated. Also, in sitting position the pressure pain threshold of the myofascial trigger point of the scapula elevator muscle was bilaterally evaluated. The minimal clinically important difference (MCDI) is 1.2 Kg/cm2.

  2. Surface electromyographic

    Time frame: 1 week

    The electromyography (EMG) signal of the upper trapezius muscle was recorded during 3 step contractions of shoulder elevation force (15%-30% maximal voluntary contraction). Se tomo el valor más alto de las tres contracciones. The signal of the sternocleidomastoid muscle was recorded during 3 billateraly step contractions of neck flexión and antepulsion neck force. Both contractions were performed in a combined and simultaneous movement, recreating the movement produced by the reaction forces in the takeoff and landing of the fighter jet. Both movements were made at 15%-30% maximal voluntary contraction, as used by Calamita et al on the same musculature in subjects with nonspecific neck pain.

  3. Kinesophobia

    Time frame: 1 week

    The Spanish version of the TSK-11 was used to measure fear of movement. Higher scores indicate greater fear-avoidance behaviors. The TSK-11 has demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and validity.

  4. Catastrophic pain

    Time frame: 1 week

    The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a self-administered scale of 13 items and one of the most used to assess catastrophism of pain. The subjects take their past painful experiences as a reference and indicate the degree to which they experienced each of the 13 thoughts or feelings on a 5-point Líkert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (always). The theoretical range of the instrument is between 13 and 62, indicating low scores, little catastrophism, and high values, high catastrophism.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Universidad de Extremadura

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Clinimetric and Instrumental Characterization of Fighter Pilots With Flight-related Neck Pain. Observational Study

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
May 20, 2020
Registry last updated
Jun 15, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.