Centre for Contact Lens Research School of Optometry & Vision Science, University of Waterloo
Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada
NCT Number: NCT03325673
This study will evaluate the increase in comfort and comfortable contact lens (CL) wear time associated with application of TrueTear (active intranasal neurostimulation) compared with application of TrueTear sham control (intranasal application which is not electrically active) in symptomatic CL wearers.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me22 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
A person is eligible for inclusion if he/she
Exclusion criteria
TrueTear Device (Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator) was used intranasally on CL wear days; it was also used on non-CL wear days if the participant chose. The number of applications was determined by participant.
TrueTear sham device, which is not electrically active and has limited tip insertion depth, was used intranasally on CL wear days; it was also used on non-CL wear days if participant chose. The number of applications was determined by participant.
Time frame: Day 28
The CLDEQ-8 is a validated questionnaire used to quantify symptoms experienced by the contact lenses (CLs) wearer. The participants were asked to respond to 8 questions about how their CLs performed over the preceding 2-week period. 4 questions (Eye discomfort, Eye dryness, Changeable blurry vision and Closing your eyes) answered on a scale of 0=Never to 4=Constantly; 3 questions about the end of wearing time (Discomfort, Dryness, Changeable blurry vision) answered on a scale of 0=Never have it to 5=Very Intense and 1 question (Removing your lenses) on a scale of 1=Never to 6=Several times a day for a total possible score of 1(best) to 37 (worst). The study eye was defined as the qualified eye with the greatest increase in tear production with stimulation by a cotton swab at the Screening Visit. If both eyes qualified, then the right eye was designated as the study eye.
Time frame: CL Insertion, After 2 hours and the End of Day on Day 24
The participant assessed contact lens comfort in the study eye using a 100 point scale where a score of 0=Extremely uncomfortable and a score of 100=Extremely comfortable. The study eye was defined as the qualified eye with the greatest increase in tear production with stimulation by a cotton swab at the Screening Visit. If both eyes qualified, then the right eye was designated as the study eye.
Time frame: Day 24
CWT was calculated by taking the difference between the time participants reported started to find their CLs getting uncomfortable and the reported insertion time for that day. The study eye was defined as the qualified eye with the greatest increase in tear production with stimulation by a cotton swab at the Screening Visit. If both eyes qualified, then the right eye was designated as the study eye.
Time frame: Day 24
Total WT was calculated by taking the difference between the time participants reported removing their CLs and the reported insertion time for that day. The study eye was defined as the qualified eye with the greatest increase in tear production with stimulation by a cotton swab at the Screening Visit. If both eyes qualified, then the right eye was designated as the study eye.
Allergan
Industry
Randomized, Double-arm, Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Symptoms in Symptomatic Contact Lens Wearers Following Application of Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator Versus Control (CORIANDER)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05481450
Dry Eye, Dry Eye Syndromes
Lutz, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06483750
Cataract Senile, Dry Eye Disease
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07588074
Conjunctival Diseases, Conjunctivitis
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04730336
Dry Eye, Dry Eye Syndromes
Solihull, United Kingdom
View Trial Details