one-to-one peer mentoring
BehavioralEach patient received one-to-one peer mentoring each week during rehabilitation and for 90 days post discharge
NCT Number: NCT02274649
The research will examine the effects of enhanced peer mentor interactions on facilitating a successful transition to community living following traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). Participants in the research will be assigned to either (1) the control group that will receive traditional peer mentor types of interactions or (2) to the intervention group that will receive an enhanced peer mentor program called the One-on-One Initiative. Assignment to one of these two groups will occur randomly on admission to Shepherd Center; the only stratifying criteria is injury level - C6 and above vs. C7 and below.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
The Peer Support Program was enhanced by the addition of Shepherd staff mentors and volunteer mentors from the community. The Peer Support Supervisor recruited volunteer peer mentors who are at least 10 months post injury, live within a 50 mile radius of Shepherd Center, and have developed a successful reintegration into community living (employed, manage a family, student, etc.). Volunteers completed Shepherd Center volunteer training and were paid a stipend of $20 per patient interaction.
Each recruited volunteer mentor, along with Shepherd Center peer mentor employees, participated in the Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation peer support mentor training program to help ensure quality interactions with Shepherd Center patients and understand/practice patient confidentiality awareness. This Foundation provides training on a national level by breaking up the country into eight regions - each with a regional coordinator and training program schedule. The faculty and staff of the University of New Mexico developed and maintain the training and certification program, including the mentor management system. The certification program is a "hybrid" program - a series of on-line modules followed by a one-day on-site session. On-line learning is great for conveying information. It saves time and allows everyone to get that information at their own pace. The one-day training session revisits topics covered in the on-line modules: effective peer mentoring, ethics, communication and resources. It includes breakout groups and group discussions. Benefits of partnering with the Foundation, including providing access to certified peer mentors for patients who live outside the Atlanta area are outlined in the attached document (ReevePeer Partnerships.pdf).
A special training session for Shepherd employees/volunteers involved:
Subjects in the control group received traditional peer support provided by Shepherd Center currently:
Subjects in the intervention group (and his/her family) received the enhanced One-on-One initiative:
On the Shepherd SCI Peers Facebook page, the peer mentor supervisor posts questions posed by patients or community members anonymously and feedback volunteered from any of the >2000 Facebook friends.This is especially helpful for sensitive topics that people may not want to be associated with initiating the question.
Evaluation All study patients were interviewed during the 10th-15th day of their stay at Shepherd Center and completed the Self Efficacy scale. Patients were contacted post via telephone at 3, 30, 90 and 180 days post discharge. At each of these times, they were asked healthcare utilization and Self Efficacy questions.
R
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Each patient received one-to-one peer mentoring each week during rehabilitation and for 90 days post discharge
General (traditional) peer support includes introduction and provision of support services upon request
Time frame: 3 days post rehabilitation discharge through 180 days post discharge
The General Self-Efficacy scale (6 items) developed at Stanford University for persons with chronic health conditions was adapted for persons with spinal cord injury. Added to this scale were 5 similarly constructed project-specific self-efficacy items focused on community navigation and accessibility (major focus of peer support program).
Respondents (via telephone interview) provided a response to each of 11 items using a 10-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not confident) to 10 (very confident). Item response scores were averaged for the total self-efficacy score. Total scores ranged from 11 to 110 (11 items with 10 response options). Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy to manage injury conditions.
Growth Curve Analysis was used to determined significant changes over time in self-efficacy. Initial status coefficients depict where participants begin at the first time point (3 days post discharge) and growth rate coefficients show how participants change over time.
Time frame: 30 days
Rehospitalization days (number) within 30 days post inpatient rehabilitation discharge
Time frame: 30 days
Percent of patients rehospitalized at 30 days post discharge from inpatient rehabilitation
Time frame: 90 days
Rehospitalization days (cumulative) within 90 days post inpatient rehabilitation discharge
Time frame: 90 days
Percent of patients (cumulative) rehospitalized within 90 days post discharge from inpatient rehabilitation
Time frame: 180 days
Rehospitalization days (cumulative) within 180 days post inpatient rehabilitation discharge
Time frame: 180 days
Percent of patients (cumulative) rehospitalized within 180 days post discharge from inpatient rehabilitation
Shepherd Center, Atlanta GA
Other
A Patient Centered Approach to Successful Community Transition After Catastrophic Injury: Clinical Trial to Evaluate One-to-one Peer Mentoring
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02943915
Central Nervous System Diseases, Injuries, Spinal Cord
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00654082
Central Nervous System Diseases, Erectile Dysfunction
Bahçelievler, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT02556125
Central Nervous System Diseases, Injuries, Spinal Cord
Gainesville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03914456
Central Nervous System Diseases, Injuries, Spinal Cord
View Trial Details