Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06309420

Clinical Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of a Cryogenic Medical Device for Treatment of Common and Plantar Warts

The present study was set-up to evaluate clinical efficacy of Pixie CO2 versus a comparator product (Wortie®) for the treatment of common and plantar warts.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

4 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Dermscan Poland

Gdansk, 80-288, Poland

About this study

The use of cryotherapy has been long known to be effective against warts. The indications for Pixie CO2 are in line with the indications presented in the collected literature data, as well as with the indications of similar devices.

The benefits of the use of cryotherapy for warts is clearly evidenced. The treatment period is short (up to 3 treatments with a 14 day interval, compared to daily application of keratinolytics or fluorouracil, over a period of weeks). The cryotherapy application through a conic applicator is much more precise than with most chemical substances. Chemical substance application is leading to more side effects of the surrounding skin (typical for chemical treatment are pain, blistering, ulceration and contact dermatitis).

The Instructions for Use were developed in line with these data and are therefore covering all hazards known up to the date of this report.

Based on these data the product received its CE-mark approval.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy subject.
  • Sex: male or female.
  • Age: more than 4 years old.
  • Subject presenting at least 1 new common wart on hand or a plantar wart (wart present since less than 6 months) of a size less than 0.8cm.
  • Subject, including minors aged more than 16 years, having given freely and expressly his/her informed consent.
  • Minor whose legal guardians have given their free and express informed consent.
  • Subject who is able to comply with the study requirements, as defined in the present rotocol, at the Investigator's appreciation.
  • Subject or child's legal guardians being affiliated to a health social security system.
  • Female subject of childbearing potential should use a medically accepted contraceptive regimen (at the Investigator's discretion) since at least 12 weeks before the beginning of the study, during all the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnant, parturient, or nursing woman or planning a pregnancy during the study.
  • Subject who had been deprived of their freedom by administrative or legal decision.
  • Subject in a social or sanitary establishment.
  • Major subject who is under guardianship or who is not able to express his consent.
  • Subject suspected to be non-compliant according to the Investigator's judgment.
  • Subject suffering from a severe or progressive disease or any other pathology that may interfere with the evaluation of the study results.
  • Subject with a cutaneous disease other than common and plantar warts, on the studied zone.
  • Subject with a known allergy to one of the component of the products or to the comparator.
  • Subject who has diabetes.
  • Subject having problems with blood circulation, or having a blood clotting condition.
  • Subject with immune deficiency or autoimmune disease.
  • Subject presenting more than 10 warts on the body.
  • Subject presenting bleeding warts.
  • Subject presenting birthmarks, moles, warts with hairs growing from them, or any other spots on the treated and surrounding area.
  • Subject having a sensitive skin, inflamed, infected, irritated, red, damaged, cut, grazed, diseased or itchy on the treated zone.
  • Subject presenting genital warts, flat warts, filiform warts, periungual warts or warts larger than 0.8cm.
  • Subject presenting 2 or more warts adjacent to each other.
  • Subject undergoing a topical treatment on the test area or a systemic treatment:
  • anti-inflammatory medication during the previous 2 weeks and during the study,
  • immunosuppressors and/or corticoids during the 4 previous weeks and during the study,
  • retinoids during the 6 previous months and during the study,
  • any medication stabilized for less than one month.
  • Subject who received a treatment of any type on the selected wart during the previous 6 months.
  • Intensive exposure to sunlight or UV-rays on the studied zone within the previous month and/or foreseen during the study.
  • Subject planning to change her/his life habits during the study.

Treatment and study plan

Cryogenic treatment of warts (Pixie CO2)

Device

Treatment of common and plantar warts by cryotherapy treatment.

Other names: X92001686

Cryogenic treatment of warts (Wortie®)

Device

Treatment of common and plantar warts by cryotherapy treatment.

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of subjects with clinical wart remission

    Time frame: 1 treatment (Day 0), 2 treatments (Day 15), 3 treatments (Day 30)

    Comparison of the percentage of subjects with clinical wart remission after 1, 2 and 3 treatments with the tested product group versus comparator group, as observed during clinical evaluation of the treated wart by a dermatologist.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of treatments

    Time frame: 1 treatment (Day 0), 2 treatments (Day 15), 3 treatments (Day 30)

    Comparison of the number of treatments needed for clinical remission of warts with both products

  2. Efficacy of the freezing process (Surface Area)

    Time frame: Measurement treatment 1 (Day 0), Measurement treatment 2 (Day 15), Measurement treatment 3 (Day 30)

    Surface area measurements of frostbite area to evaluate the efficacy of the freezing process

  3. Diameter of the wart

    Time frame: Before treatment Day 0, after 1 treatment (Day 3 & Day 15), after 2 treatments (Day 30), after 3 treatments (Day 45)

    Macrophotography of the wart

  4. Roughness of the wart

    Time frame: Before treatment Day 0, after 1 treatment (Day 3 & Day 15), after 2 treatments (Day 30), after 3 treatments (Day 45)

    Evaluation of roughness of the wart by blinded dermatologist. Classification scheme was used: 0=absence, 1=light, 2=moderate, 3=severe, and 4=very severe

  5. Thickness of the wart (For common warts only)

    Time frame: Before treatment Day 0, after 1 treatment (Day 3 & Day 15), after 2 treatments (Day 30), after 3 treatments (Day 45)

    Evaluation of thickness of the wart by blinded dermatologist. Classification scheme was used: 0=absence, 1=light, 2=moderate, 3=severe, and 4=very severe

  6. Presence of small dark spot (For plantar warts only)

    Time frame: Before treatment Day 0, after 1 treatment (Day 3 & Day 15), after 2 treatments (Day 30), after 3 treatments (Day 45)

    Evaluation of presence of a small dark spot by blinded dermatologist. Classification scheme was used: 0=absence, 1=light, 2=moderate, 3=severe, and 4=very severe

  7. Healing process of the wart

    Time frame: After 1 treatment (Day 3 & Day 15), after 2 treatments (Day 30), after 3 treatments (Day 45)

    Evaluation of healing process of the wart by blinded dermatologist.

    This is done by assessing:

    • Discontinuation of skin lines (5 categories: 0=none, 1=light, 2=moderate, 3=severe, and 4=very severe)
    • Affection of skin color (5 categories: 0=none, 1=light, 2=moderate, 3=severe, and 4=very severe)
    • Presence/absence of a scab.
  8. Local & general tolerance

    Time frame: When wart is considered cured at Day 15, Day 30 or Day 45 or at the end of study on Day 45.

    Evaluate the safety of the products by assessing local & general tolerance. Local tolerance will be assessed by using the following scale (0= Bad tolerance, 1= Moderade tolerance, 2= Good tolerance, 3=Very good tolerance.) Abnormal clinical signs and subjective signs reported by the subjects will be reported in the CRF.

    The general tolerance is a collection of adverse events by the investigator.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Oystershell NV

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Prospective, Single-blinded, Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Cryogenic Medical Device in Treatment of Common and Plantar Warts Versus a Comparator Product.

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Mar 13, 2024
Registry last updated
Mar 13, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.