Hospital de Saint Louis
Lisbon, 1200-249 Lisboa, Portugal
NCT Number: NCT02074644
The purpose of this study is to determine whether prostatic arterial embolization (PAE) compared is an effective and safe treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients with severe lower urinary tract symptoms not adequately controlled by medical therapy with alpha-blockers, as assessed by the the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) after 6 months. Patients will be randomized on a 1:1 ratio to PAE or to a sham procedure and evaluated at 1, 3 and 6 months. Patients randomized to the sham procedure will be offered the possibility of performing PAE after 6 months. All patients may participate on an optional 6-months extension study.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me45 year and older
Male
Interventional
Not applicable
Lisbon, 1200-249 Lisboa, Portugal
This is a randomized, parallel-group, evaluator-blind, superiority, controlled clinical trial of PAE versus a sham procedure in patients with BPH with severe LUTS not adequately controlled by medical therapy with alpha-blockers.
This study has a screening visit at day -14, a baseline visit at day -2, a randomization and intervention visit at day 0, follow up visits at months 1, 3 and 6.
Patients initially randomized to the sham procedure and who completed the 6 month follow-up period will be offered the possibility of performing PAE at no cost. All patients will be invited to participate in a 6 months post-trial extension study.
Patients over 45 years-old with a diagnosis of BPH associated with severe LUTS defined by an IPSS>=20 after a minimum of 6 months treatment with alpha-blockers and with a prostate volume ≥ 40 mL will start a two weeks screening period. Eligible patients will be started either tamsulosin 0.4 mg q.d., alfuzosin 10 mg q.d. or silodosin 8 mg q.d., which will be maintained throughout the study period, and have the intervention scheduled for the following 2 days (study day 0), when they will be randomized to PAE or to a sham procedure if the procedure is technically feasible
Those patients in whom angiography has shown that PAE is technically feasible will be randomized to one of the study arms on a 1:1 ratio. Patients in both groups will be submitted to exactly the same procedure, except that patients randomized to the control group will not be injected with polyvinyl alcohol particles. Patients will be discharged as soon as their clinical condition is stabilized
Patients will be assessed at 1, 3 and 6 months with IPSS, QoL, IIEF, BPH-II and will perform prostatic ultrasonography, uroflowmetry and PSA at month 1 and 6. At 1 month a pelvic NMR will be performed to evaluate prostate volume and the degree of ischemia.
Patients completing the 6 month follow-up period will be invited to enter a 6 months extension study. In this extension study, patients will be evaluated at month 12 for all efficacy variables. Patients initially randomized to the sham procedure who wanted to perform PAE after the conclusion of the trial will be evaluated only at months 1, 3 and 6 after PAE.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The prostatic arteries are selectively catheterized with a Progreat 2.7 microcatheter and an angiography is performed to confirm that the catheter is in the prostatic artery. Bead Block 300-500 or PVA 100+200 micra particles are slowly injected under fluoroscopic control until the end point is reached. Embolization is considered finished when there is "near stasis" in the prostatic vessels with interruption of the arterial flow and prostatic gland opacification checked in both oblique and AP views. Upon finishing the embolization of the left prostatic arteries, the right prostatic arteries are embolized in the same way.
The prostatic arteries are selectively catheterized with a Progreat 2.7 microcatheter and an angiography is performed to confirm that the catheter is in the prostatic artery. The catheter is removed and no particles are injected.
Time frame: 6 months
The difference between the baseline value and the value observed at the last valid observation of a validated questionnaire that measures the disconfort caused by lowere urinary tract symptoms
Time frame: 6 months
The score of a question on the IPSS questionnare that measures quality of life in subjects with lower urinary tract symptoms at the last valid observation in each subject
Time frame: 6 months
The difference between the baseline value and the value observed at the last valid observation on a validated questionnaire that measures the disconfort caused by lowere urinary tract symptoms
Time frame: 6 months
The difference between the baseline value and the value observed at the last valid observation on a validated questionnaire that measures the severity of erectile disfunction
Time frame: 6 months
The difference between the baseline value and the value observed at the last valid observation of the maximum flow rate of the urinary stream by uroflowmetry
Time frame: 6 months
TThe difference between the baseline value and the value observed at the last valid observation of he volume of urine in the bladder after a complete voiding assessed by uroflowmetry
Time frame: 6 months
The difference between the baseline value and the value observed at the last valid observation of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasonography
Time frame: 6 months
The difference between the baseline value and the value observed at the last valid observation of PSA.
João Martins Pisco
Other
Randomized, Evaluator-blind, Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Prostatic Arterial Embolization Versus a Sham Procedure for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Severe LUTS Not Adequately Controlled With Alpha-blockers
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04383093
Erectile Dysfunction, Genital Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT03230721
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
View Trial DetailsNCT02943070
Adenoma, Prostatic, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Brno, Czechia
View Trial DetailsNCT02940392
Adenoma, Prostatic, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
La Romana, Dominican Republic
View Trial Details