Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02421588

Clinical Trial of Lurbinectedin (PM01183) in Platinum Resistant Ovarian Cancer Patients

Multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled phase III clinical trial to evaluate the activity and safety of PM01183 versus PLD or topotecan as control arm in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. PM01183 will be explored as single agent in the experimental arm (Arm A) versus PLD or topotecan in the control arm (Arm B).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

1112, Peoria, Arizona, United States

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age >/= 18 years
  • Confirmed diagnosis of unresectable epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer.
  • Platinum-resistant disease (PFI: 1-6 months after last platinum-containing chemotherapy).
  • Evaluable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v.1.1 criteria
  • No more than three prior systemic chemotherapy regimens
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) (ECOG PS) ≤ 2
  • Adequate hematological, renal, metabolic and hepatic function

Exclusion criteria

  • Concomitant diseases/conditions: cardiac disease, immunodeficiency, chronic active hepatitis or cirrhosis, uncontrolled infection, bowel obstruction, any other major illness
  • Prior treatment with PM01183, trabectedin, or with both PLD and topotecan.
  • Requirement of permanent or frequent (i.e., once per week) external drainages within two weeks prior to randomization

Treatment and study plan

lurbinectedin (PM01183)

Drug

Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD)

Drug

Topotecan

Drug

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression-free Survival by Independent Review Committee

    Time frame: Time from the date of randomization to the date of PD, death (of any cause), or last tumor evaluation, whichever came first, assessed up to 3 years

    The primary endpoint was PFS by IRC assessment, defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of documented progression per RECIST v.1.1 or death (regardless of the cause of death). If the patient received further antitumor therapy or was lost to follow-up before PD, PFS was censored at the date of last tumor assessment before the date of subsequent antitumor treatment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Progression-free Survival by Investigator's Assessment

    Time frame: Time from the date of randomization to the date of PD, death (of any cause), or last tumor evaluation, whichever came first, assessed up to 3 years

    The primary endpoint was PFS by Investigator's Assessment, defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of documented progression per RECIST v.1.1 or death (regardless of the cause of death). If the patient received further antitumor therapy or was lost to follow-up before PD, PFS was censored at the date of last tumor assessment before the date of subsequent antitumor treatment.

  2. Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of death or last contact, up to 12 months after last patient inclusion, for a maximum of up to 3 years

    Calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death (death event) or last contact (in this case, survival was censored on that date).

  3. Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Independent Review Committee

    Time frame: At baseline and every eight weeks from randomization until evidence of PD, assessed up to 3 years

    Best antitumor response defined as the best response obtained according to RECIST v.1.1. Tumor assessment were performed at baseline and every 8 weeks from randomization until evidence of PD. Patients who discontinued treatment without PD continued with assessments.

    Antitumor activity was assessed using the RECIST v.1.1 by the appropriate method [computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging]: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters; Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum; Overall Response (OR)=CR+PR.

  4. Overall Response Rate by Investigator's Assessment

    Time frame: At baseline and every eight weeks from randomization until evidence of PD, assessed up to 3 years

    Best antitumor response defined as the best response obtained according to RECIST v.1.1. Tumor assessment were performed at baseline and every 8 weeks from randomization until evidence of PD. Patients who discontinued treatment without PD continued with assessments.

    Antitumor activity was assessed using the RECIST v.1.1 by the appropriate method [computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging]: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters; Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum; Overall Response (OR)=CR+PR.

  5. Duration of Response by Independent Review Committee

    Time frame: The time from the date when the response criteria (PR or CR, whichever was reached first) were fulfilled, to the first date when PD, recurrence or death was documented, up to 3 years

    Duration of response (DR): calculated from the date of first documentation of response per RECIST v.1.1 (CR or PR, whichever came first) to the date of documented PD or death. The censoring rules defined above for PFS were used for duration of response.

    Best antitumor response defined as the best response obtained according to RECIST v.1.1. Tumor assessment were performed at baseline and every 8 weeks from randomization until evidence of PD. Patients who discontinued treatment without PD continued with assessments.

    Antitumor activity was assessed using the RECIST v.1.1 by the appropriate method [computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging]: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR)=CR+PR.

  6. Duration of Response by Investigator's Assessment

    Time frame: The time from the date when the response criteria (PR or CR, whichever was reached first) were fulfilled, to the first date when PD, recurrence or death was documented, up to 3 years

    Duration of response (DR): calculated from the date of first documentation of response per RECIST v.1.1 (CR or PR, whichever came first) to the date of documented PD or death. The censoring rules defined above for PFS were used for duration of response.

    Best antitumor response defined as the best response obtained according to RECIST v.1.1. Tumor assessment were performed at baseline and every 8 weeks from randomization until evidence of PD. Patients who discontinued treatment without PD continued with assessments.

    Antitumor activity was assessed using the RECIST v.1.1 by the appropriate method [computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging]: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR)=CR+PR.

  7. Best Response According to Tumor Marker Evaluation (CA-125)

    Time frame: At baseline and every eight weeks from randomization until evidence of PD, up to 3 years

    Best response according to tumor marker evaluation (CA-125): defined as the best response obtained according to GCIG criteria. Tumor marker assessments were performed at baseline and every eight weeks from randomization until evidence of PD. Progression based on serum CA-125 levels was defined on the basis of a progressive serial elevation of serum CA-125 according to:

    A. Patients with elevated CA-125 pretreatment and normalization of CA-125 must show evidence of CA-125 greater than, or equal to, 2 times the upper limit of the reference range on 2 occasions at least 1 week apart or B. Patients with elevated CA-125 before treatment, which never normalizes, must show evidence of CA-125 greater than, or equal to, 2 times the nadir value on 2 occasions at least 1 week apart or C. Patients with CA-125 in the reference range before treatment must show evidence of CA-125 greater than, or equal to, 2 times the upper limit of the reference range on 2 occasions at least 1 week apart.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

PharmaMar

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial of Lurbinectedin (PM01183) Versus Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin or Topotecan in Patients With Platinum-resistant Ovarian Cancer (CORAIL Trial)

Acronym: CORAIL

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Apr 20, 2015
Registry last updated
Apr 3, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.