Program 1
BehavioralProgram 1 will teach participants how to recognize, label, and differentiate their emotions. The program will cover ways to reduce feeling "confused" or numb, and decrease the feelings of anger, stress and being overwhelmed.
NCT Number: NCT07436754
The purpose of the study is to test two different training programs to find out which is better at helping people with a concussion or mild TBI (mTBI) improve their emotional health and well-being. Study participation is completely remote and will last approximately 8 months total, involving 4 assessment visits and 8 sessions of brain training via a secure video-conferencing platform. The 4 assessment visits (about 30-90 minutes each) include surveys and questionnaires about participant's emotional health. These assessment visits will take place before the training, immediately after the training, 3 months after training and 6 months after training. The 8 sessions of 1-on-1 training (about 60-90 minutes each) will be completed over the course of approximately 1 month.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Program 1 will teach participants how to recognize, label, and differentiate their emotions. The program will cover ways to reduce feeling "confused" or numb, and decrease the feelings of anger, stress and being overwhelmed.
Program 2 will teach participants strategies to improve their overall brain health and functioning. It will also teach participants how to develop and work towards individualized short-term and long-term goals aimed at improving their quality of life.
Time frame: 1) baseline 2) immediate post-treatment, 3) 3 months post-treatment; 4) 6- months post-treatment.
his widely used alexithymia assessment (including the TBI population), is comprised of 3 factors: 1) ability to identify emotions); 2) ability to describe emotions; and 3) externally-oriented thinking. In addition to being a co-primary outcome measure, the TAS-20 scores will be used to determine eligibility (>.5 SD above published means). It is a CDE and a PhenX toolkit measure has good psychometric properties, including good test-retest reliability. Range: Min/ Max = 20 to 100 Lower scores indicate less alexithymia (good); higher scores indicate greater alexithymia (bad)
Time frame: 1) baseline 2) immediate post-treatment, 3) 3 months; 4) 6- months
This commonly used measure of emotion dysregulation, uses a 5-point Likert scale, participants rate the frequency they utilize self-regulation behaviors in response to general emotional distress. Items are summed to provide a Total Emotion Dysregulation score. The DERS has high internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and good construct validity.56 Will be used to evaluate emotion dysregulation and to determine eligibility (>.5 SD above published means). Range: Min/ Max = 36 to 180. Lower scores indicate less dysregulation (good); higher scores indicate more dysregulation (bad)
Time frame: 1) baseline 2) immediate post-treatment, 3) 3 months; 4) 6- months
Self-administered questionnaire with 6 items using a 5-point Likert-style scale to assess the ability to bounce back or recover from stress. Scores range from 6-30. The BRS is a recommended CDE in the PhenXToolkit and has been found to have good reliability and validity. Range: Min/ Max = 6 to 30. Lower scores indicate worse resilience; higher scores indicate better resilience
Time frame: 1) baseline 2) immediate post-treatment, 3) 3 months; 4) 6- months
This 9 item self-report depression assessment uses a 3-point Likert scale with established validity and reliability, including in the TBI population.64,65 Participants rate the frequency of specified problems during the past 2 weeks. Range: Min/ Max = 0 to 27 Lower scores indicate less depression; higher scores indicate higher depression
Time frame: 1) baseline 2) immediate post-treatment, 3) 3 months; 4) 6- months
The PROMIS item bank (8a) for anxiety is 8 items and the Anger item bank (5a) includes 5 items. The Anxiety instrument measures self-reported fear (fearfulness, panic), anxious misery (worry, dread), hyperarousal (tension, nervousness, restlessness), and somatic symptoms related to arousal (racing heart, dizziness). All use a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from never to always. These are Common Data Elements (CDE) measures and have good psychometric properties. Range: Min/ Max = 8 to 40 Lower scores indicate less anxiety; higher scores indicate higher anxiety
Time frame: 1) baseline 2) immediate post-treatment, 3) 3 months; 4) 6- months
The PROMIS Anger instrument assesses self-reported angry mood (irritability, frustration), negative social cognitions (interpersonal sensitivity, envy, disagreeableness), and efforts to control anger. All use a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from never to always. These are Common Data Elements (CDE) measures and have good psychometric properties. Range: Min/ Max = 5 to 25 Lower scores indicate less anger; high scores indicate more anger
Time frame: 1) baseline 2) immediate post-treatment, 3) 3 months; 4) 6- months
PCL-5 is used to measure PTSD symptomatology. The PCL-5 is a 20-item, self-rating scale that provides a quick and accurate measure of PTSD symptoms. Each item corresponds to current diagnostic criteria of PTSD, and each symptom is rated in terms of frequency and severity. The PCL-5 is applied generally to any traumatic event and therefore would capture any military-specific trauma. Psychometric properties indicate the PCL to be a valid instrument of PTSD symptoms. Range: Min/ Max = 0 to 80. Lower scores indicate less posttraumatic stress; high scores indicates greater post-traumatic stress
Time frame: 1) baseline 2) immediate post-treatment, 3) 3 months; 4) 6- months
The PGIC captures the patient perspective regarding the achievement of clinically important change with a single item asking perception of change across a rating scale ranging from 1 (no change) to 7 (a great deal better and a considerable improvement). Two separate PGIC assessments will be administered to participants immediately (within a week)- one to evaluate perceived change in global emotional functioning/ PH (PGIC-Emotion) and the other to evaluate perceived global changes in quality of life (PGIC-QoL). In addition to the traditional 7-point rating scale, participants will also be asked to provide a list of changes (if any) in their emotional functioning and psychological health for the PGIC-emotion, and to list any changes in their life quality for the PGIC-QoL. This "Free listing" will have participants list all the items, concepts, or ideas that come to mind regarding their global changes.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Hackensack Meridian Health
Other
Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Building Emotional Self-awareness Teletherapy (BEST) at Improving Psychological Health in Service Members With Brain Injury
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05446584
Amnestic Mild Cognitive Disorder, Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment
Dallas, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04867317
Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency, Bone Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05825027
Brain Concussion, Brain Diseases
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07341074
Brain Concussion, Brain Diseases
Groningen, Netherlands
View Trial Details