Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07234409

Clinical Trial Addressing the Best Surgical Approach for Partial Nephrectomy With Single Port Robotic System in the Management of Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma

This study aims to find out which surgical position is safer and works better for patients candidate to robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) - a minimally invasive procedure to remove a small kidney tumor while preserving healthy kidney tissue.

During this operation, the patient can be placed in two different positions:

* the standard flank position, where the patient lies on their side * a newer supine position, where the patient lies on their back using a technique called Supine Anterior Retroperitoneal Approach (SARA).

Both approaches are performed using the Da Vinci® Single Port (SP) robotic system, a state-of-the-art surgical robot that allows the operation to be done through a single small incision.

The traditional flank position has been used for many years, but it can be uncomfortable for patients and may increase the risk of certain anesthetic or nerve-related complications, especially in people with higher body weight. The new supine SARA technique could make surgery faster, safer, and less painful, but it has not yet been tested in a randomized study.

This is the first clinical trial designed to directly compare these two approaches in patients with small and localized kidney cancers (tumors ≤7 cm, stage cT1).

The study will include 124 patients treated at ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda in Milan, Italy - a leading center in robotic urologic surgery.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

About this study

Study Objectives

Primary Objective:

To compare the outcomes of RAPN performed with the SARA approach versus the standard flank approach in achieving a "trifecta outcome," defined as:

  • No intraoperative adverse events;
  • Negative (cancer-free) surgical margins;
  • Hospital discharge on postoperative day 1.

Secondary Objectives:

  • To compare both approaches according to the rate of achievement of two out of three outcomes, and according to each outcome composing the trifecta separately.
  • To evaluate postoperative recovery, including pain scores, time to first walk, time to first flatus, total use of pain medication, and readiness for discharge.
  • To compare the rates and severity of postoperative complications within 30 days after surgery.
  • To assess surgical parameters such as total operative time, ischemia time, and blood loss.
  • To analyze functional outcomes, such as kidney function recovery (Δ eGFR at 30 days).

Study Design This is a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial conducted at the Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.

Eligible participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 to one of two groups:

Group A (Control): Standard flank approach (transperitoneal or retroperitoneal) using the Da Vinci SP system. Patients are positioned laterally (on their side) with the operative flank elevated at a 12-15° angle. The Da Vinci SP robotic system is docked either transperitoneally or retroperitoneally through a single access port. The tumor is resected and kidney reconstruction is performed according to standard RAPN procedures Group B (Experimental): Supine anterior retroperitoneal approach (SARA) using the Da Vinci SP system. Patients are positioned supine with a mild Trendelenburg tilt (0°-10°). A retroperitoneal space is created through an anterior incision, providing direct access to the kidney without repositioning. The same Da Vinci SP system and standard nephron-sparing techniques are used.

Both groups follow identical perioperative protocols for anesthesia, analgesia, and postoperative care.

Population Adults (age 18 or older) with a single kidney tumor measuring up to 7 cm, who are eligible for robotic partial nephrectomy with the Da Vinci SP system, may be invited to participate. Patients with kidney tumor more than 7 cm or advanced tumors infiltrating the surroinding tissues, solitary kidneys, previous kidney surgery on the same kidney, or severe kidney disease will not be eligible.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

  • Age ≥ 18 years;
  • Presence of a single, unilateral, primary renal mass ≤ 7 cm in diameter (clinical stage cT1) documented CT scan
  • No evidence of systemic disease or lymph node involvement;
  • Candidate for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy using the Da Vinci SP platform;
  • Signed informed consent
  • Absence of solitary kidney status
  • No previous partial nephrectomy/ies on the same kidney
  • Absence of preoperative chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5
  • Absence of any condition that makes mandatory or significantly more adequate the choice of a specific approach over the others (e.g., multiple previous major abdominal surgeries, horseshoe kidney, presence of stomas)

Treatment and study plan

STANDARD FLANK APPROACH

Other

Patients are positioned laterally (on their side) with the operative flank elevated at a 12-15° angle. The Da Vinci SP robotic system is docked either transperitoneally or retroperitoneally through a single access port.

Supine anterior retroperitoneal approach (SARA).

Procedure

Patients are positioned supine with a mild Trendelenburg tilt (0°-10°). A retroperitoneal space is created through an anterior incision, providing direct access to the kidney without repositioning

Primary outcomes

  1. TRIFECTA

    Time frame: Intra and perioperative

    Trifecta is defined as the coexistence of these three conditions:

    • Absence of any intraoperative adverse event
    • Absence of positive surgical margins
    • Hospital discharge at postoperative day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Partial trifecta achievement

    Time frame: Intra and perioperative

    Secondary end point of the study is to compare RAPN performed with the SARA approach vs RAPN performed with standard flank approach according to the rate of achievement of two out of three outcomes, and lastly according to each outcome composing the trifecta separately.

  2. 30 day complications

    Time frame: 30 postoperative days

    complications

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Paolo Dell'Oglio, MD PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+393407981232

Stefano Tappero, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+393287132369

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Niguarda Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Standard Flank Approach vs Supine Approach for Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy

Acronym: K3

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2027
First posted
Nov 18, 2025
Registry last updated
Nov 21, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.