ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda
Milan, 20162, Italy
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07234409
This study aims to find out which surgical position is safer and works better for patients candidate to robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) - a minimally invasive procedure to remove a small kidney tumor while preserving healthy kidney tissue.
During this operation, the patient can be placed in two different positions:
* the standard flank position, where the patient lies on their side * a newer supine position, where the patient lies on their back using a technique called Supine Anterior Retroperitoneal Approach (SARA).
Both approaches are performed using the Da Vinci® Single Port (SP) robotic system, a state-of-the-art surgical robot that allows the operation to be done through a single small incision.
The traditional flank position has been used for many years, but it can be uncomfortable for patients and may increase the risk of certain anesthetic or nerve-related complications, especially in people with higher body weight. The new supine SARA technique could make surgery faster, safer, and less painful, but it has not yet been tested in a randomized study.
This is the first clinical trial designed to directly compare these two approaches in patients with small and localized kidney cancers (tumors ≤7 cm, stage cT1).
The study will include 124 patients treated at ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda in Milan, Italy - a leading center in robotic urologic surgery.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Milan, 20162, Italy
Location status: Recruiting
Study Objectives
Primary Objective:
To compare the outcomes of RAPN performed with the SARA approach versus the standard flank approach in achieving a "trifecta outcome," defined as:
Secondary Objectives:
Study Design This is a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial conducted at the Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Eligible participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 to one of two groups:
Group A (Control): Standard flank approach (transperitoneal or retroperitoneal) using the Da Vinci SP system. Patients are positioned laterally (on their side) with the operative flank elevated at a 12-15° angle. The Da Vinci SP robotic system is docked either transperitoneally or retroperitoneally through a single access port. The tumor is resected and kidney reconstruction is performed according to standard RAPN procedures Group B (Experimental): Supine anterior retroperitoneal approach (SARA) using the Da Vinci SP system. Patients are positioned supine with a mild Trendelenburg tilt (0°-10°). A retroperitoneal space is created through an anterior incision, providing direct access to the kidney without repositioning. The same Da Vinci SP system and standard nephron-sparing techniques are used.
Both groups follow identical perioperative protocols for anesthesia, analgesia, and postoperative care.
Population Adults (age 18 or older) with a single kidney tumor measuring up to 7 cm, who are eligible for robotic partial nephrectomy with the Da Vinci SP system, may be invited to participate. Patients with kidney tumor more than 7 cm or advanced tumors infiltrating the surroinding tissues, solitary kidneys, previous kidney surgery on the same kidney, or severe kidney disease will not be eligible.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Patients are positioned laterally (on their side) with the operative flank elevated at a 12-15° angle. The Da Vinci SP robotic system is docked either transperitoneally or retroperitoneally through a single access port.
Patients are positioned supine with a mild Trendelenburg tilt (0°-10°). A retroperitoneal space is created through an anterior incision, providing direct access to the kidney without repositioning
Time frame: Intra and perioperative
Trifecta is defined as the coexistence of these three conditions:
Time frame: Intra and perioperative
Secondary end point of the study is to compare RAPN performed with the SARA approach vs RAPN performed with standard flank approach according to the rate of achievement of two out of three outcomes, and lastly according to each outcome composing the trifecta separately.
Time frame: 30 postoperative days
complications
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Paolo Dell'Oglio, MD PhD
CONTACT
Stefano Tappero, MD
CONTACT
Niguarda Hospital
Other
Standard Flank Approach vs Supine Approach for Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy
Acronym: K3
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07397611
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02346435
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06903312
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Roma, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT04823923
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Marseille, France
View Trial Details