Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06153511

Clinical Study With a Robotic Assistant in Patients Requiring a Spinal Transpedicular Fixation

This multicenter, non-comparative clinical trial, led by two principal investigators in Spain, aims to evaluate the safety and performance of a robotic assistant, based on a electromechanical tracking system, in patients requiring transpedicular screw fixation. The study, conducted in two different hospital centers, involves patients with vertebral fractures, spinal stenosis, kyphosis, and other related conditions. The primary objective is to determine screw accuracy by assessing the degree of screw invasion into the pedicle using the Gertzbein-Robbins scale, with a target of achieving 96% acceptable screw placement. Trained radiologists will evaluate the screw invasion into the pedicle. The study is scheduled to span 12 months and each intervention includes a 1-month follow-up. Throughout this time frame, patients will undergo regular assessments, and outcomes will be closely monitored.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Cyber Surgery

Donostia / San Sebastian, Gipuzkoa, 20001, Spain

About this study

Multicenter non-comparative clinical trial.

This interventional study aims to assess the safety and performance of a robotic assistant, based on a electromechanical tracking system, in patients requiring transpedicular screw fixation.The primary focus is on overcoming the limitations of traditional minimally invasive surgeries and enhancing the accuracy of pedicle screw placement, especially within the complex pedicle region adjacent to the spinal canal.

The study design is a prospective interventional trial conducted in two hospital centers in Spain, with two principal investigators leading the investigation. Patients requiring transpedicular screw fixation will be recruited. The robotic assistant will be employed to facilitate transpedicular screw fixation. The system aims to improve accuracy and safety in screw placement, in comparison with conventional techniques used.

Patients will include individuals with spinal fractures, spinal stenosis, kyphosis, and other conditions requiring transpedicular screw fixation. Two principal investigators in Spain will lead the recruitment process.

The study aims to answer several key questions:

  • Determine Screw Accuracy: Assess the degree of screw invasion into the pedicle using the Gertzbein-Robbins scale, with a target of achieving 96% acceptable screw placement.
  • Evaluate Planning vs. Final Screw Placement: Determine the accuracy of screw placement by comparing planned positions with the actual final positions.
  • System Performance: Assess the overall performance of the robotic system during the surgical procedure.
  • Reoperation and Postoperative Time: Determine the need for reoperation and evaluate postoperative recovery time.
  • Adverse Events: Detect and document any adverse events occurring during the surgical process.

Trained radiologists will play a crucial role in evaluating the accuracy of screw placement, focusing on the degree of invasion into the pedicle using the Gertzbein-Robbins scale. The study is set to span a duration of 12 months,during which patients will undergo regular assessments, and outcomes will be closely monitored. The inclusion of the electromechanical tracking system in the robotic assistant adds a technological dimension to the investigation, contributing to advancements in the field of minimally invasive spinal surgeries.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient scheduled for spinal fusion Surgery requiring pedicle screw insertion.
  • Open or minimally invasive (MIS) technique.
  • Spinal regions: lumbar, thoracic and/or sacral (one patient may cover several regions).
  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Paediatric patient (< 18 years)
  • Pedicular Surgery history with screw insertion in the vertebra to be operated.
  • Any contraindication for the pedicular screw placement.
  • Severe scoliosis.
  • Severe osteoporosis.
  • Infection or neoplasia.
  • Obesity.
  • Pregnancy and lactancy.
  • Any other disease or disorder that, in the opinión of the neurosurgeron, may put the patient at risk or may influence the results of the study.
  • Simultaneous participation in other clinical studies.
  • For whatever reason, the Clinical protocol cannot be followed.
  • The patient is unable, or unwilling, to sign the informed consent.
  • Patients in emergency situation who are not legally able to participate in the study.

Treatment and study plan

Robot assisted spinal transpedicular fixation

Procedure

Surgical technique which joins two or more vetebrae with screws and rods to prevent any relative movement between them. It is a major surgery that usually lasts several hours and in which the patient is subjected to general anesthesia. The screws to be placed go through a narrow area of the vertebra known as the pedicle. Each patient will undergo a singular intervention.

Other names: Robotic assisted pedicle screw insertion

Primary outcomes

  1. Grade of screw invasion into the pedicle based on Gertzbein-Robbins scale (A-E grade)

    Time frame: 1 month follow-up

    Grade A: Screw position within the pedicle. Grade B: Cortical breakage ≤2mm. Grade C: Cortical breakage ≤4mm. Grade D: Cortical breakage ≤6mm. Grade E: Cortical breakage >6mm.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient characteristics - Demographic dates - Sex (Male/Female)

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Patient characteristics - Demographic dates - Age (years)

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Patient characteristics - Demographic dates - Weight (kg)

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. Patient characteristics - Demographic dates - Height (cm)

    Time frame: 3 months

  5. Patient characteristics - BMI

    Time frame: 3 months

    W [kg]/H [m2]

  6. Patient characteristics - Spinal Region (Thoracic/Lumbar/Sacral)

    Time frame: 3 months

  7. Patient characteristics - Vertebrae for study (T1...T12/L1...L5/S1-S2)

    Time frame: 3 months

  8. Patient characteristics - Comobidities

    Time frame: 3 months

    Charlson Index (1-6 pts)

  9. Patient characteristics - Number of screws to be placed

    Time frame: 3 months

  10. Implant characteristics - Planned vertebrae

    Time frame: 3 months

  11. Implant characteristics - Laterality (L/R)

    Time frame: 3 months

  12. Implant characteristics - Screw orientation in sagittal plane (Cranial/Caudal/Neutral)

    Time frame: 3 months

  13. Implant characteristics - Screw orientation in axial plane (Medial/Lateral/Neutral)

    Time frame: 3 months

  14. Implant characteristics - Screw dimensions - Screw diameter (mm)

    Time frame: 3 months

  15. Implant characteristics - Screw dimensions - Screw length (mm)

    Time frame: 3 months

  16. Clinical Intervention - Surgical technique (open/MIS)

    Time frame: 3 months

  17. Clinical Intervention - ASA Anaesthesia (I-IV)

    Time frame: 3 months

  18. Clinical Intervention - Radiation emission - Time (sec.)

    Time frame: 3 months

  19. Clinical Intervention - Radiation emission - Dosage (mGy)

    Time frame: 3 months

  20. Clinical Intervention - Blood loss - Intraoperatice blood loss (ml)

    Time frame: 3 months

  21. Clinical Intervention - Blood loss - Number of gauzes used

    Time frame: 3 months

  22. Clinical Intervention - Blood loss - Postoperative drainage (ml)

    Time frame: 3 months

  23. Clinical Intervention - Blood loss - Duration of surgery - Total (min.)

    Time frame: 3 months

  24. Clinical Intervention - Blood loss - Duration of surgery per stages - Power on and disposition (min.)

    Time frame: 3 months

  25. Clinical Intervention - Blood loss - Duration of surgery per stages - Planification (min.)

    Time frame: 3 months

  26. Clinical Intervention - Blood loss - Duration of surgery per stages - Image registration (min.)

    Time frame: 3 months

  27. Clinical Intervention - Blood loss - Duration of surgery per stages - Positioning (min.)

    Time frame: 3 months

  28. Clinical Intervention - Blood loss - Duration of surgery per stages - Surgery (min.)

    Time frame: 3 months

  29. Clinical Intervention - Blood loss - Duration of surgery per stages - Removal and power off (min.)

    Time frame: 3 months

  30. Clinical Intervention - Blood loss - Postoperative stay (days)

    Time frame: 1 month follow-up

  31. System performance - Number of image registration

    Time frame: 1 month follow-up

  32. System performance - Number of screws not inserted using the robotic assistant

    Time frame: 1 month follow-up

  33. System performance - Number of colisioned screws

    Time frame: 1 month follow-up

  34. System performance - Number of not reachable screws

    Time frame: 1 month follow-up

  35. System performance - Fiducial Registration Error, FRE (mm)

    Time frame: 3 months

  36. System performance - Screw position deviation - Spatial deviation in XY plane (mm)

    Time frame: 1 month follow-up

  37. System performance - Screw position deviation - Spatial deviation in XZ plane (mm)

    Time frame: 1 month follow-up

  38. System performance - Screw position deviation - Spatial deviation in YZ plane (mm)

    Time frame: 1 month follow-up

  39. System performance - Screw position deviation - Angular deviation in XY plane (deg.)

    Time frame: 1 month follow-up

  40. System performance - Screw position deviation - Angular deviation in XZ plane (deg.)

    Time frame: 1 month follow-up

  41. System performance - Screw position deviation - Angular deviation in YZ plane (deg.)

    Time frame: 1 month follow-up

  42. Adverse Events, AE

    Time frame: 1 month follow-up

  43. Severe Adverse Events, SAE

    Time frame: 1 month follow-up

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Cyber Surgery S.L.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Clinical Investigation With a Robotic Assistant for Spinal Surgery in Patients Requiring a Transpedicular Fixation

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Dec 1, 2023
Registry last updated
Dec 1, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.