Neuronox
DrugOther names: Clostridium Botulinum Toxin A 100 U
NCT Number: NCT03216408
This clinical study evaluates the efficacy and safety of Neuronox compared with Botox in adults with moderate to severe glabellar lines.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Subjects are randomly assigned into the two groups at the ratio of 2:1. The purpose of study is to confirm the non-inferiority of Neuronox to Botox in terms of the efficacy and safety in subjects with moderate to severe glabellar lines.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Other names: Clostridium Botulinum Toxin A 100 U
Other names: Clostridium Botulinum Toxin A 50 U
Time frame: 4 weeks after injection
Glabellar line improvement rate at maximum frown
Medy-Tox
Industry
A Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel, Active-controlled, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of NEURONOX® vs. BOTOX® in Patients With Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06308198
Glabellar Lines
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05496335
Glabellar Lines
Newport Beach, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07622004
Glabellar Lines
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT07398755
Glabellar Lines, Midface Volume Deficiency
Vienna, State of Vienna, Austria
View Trial Details