Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05190042

Clinical Study on Continuous Suture of Endoscopic Mucosal Defects

The use of clips to completely clip mucosal defects after ESD/EMR can reduce postoperative adverse events, but the rate of incomplete mucosal defects closure is high. The continuous suture technique can completely close the mucosal defects by using surgical sutures and clips to suture the mucosal defects after ESD/EMR. In this study, a clinical randomized controlled study was conducted in our hospital. A total of 62 enrolled patients were divided into two groups, 31 patients were set as a treatment group using continuous suture technique to close post-EMR/ESD mucosal/submucosal defects, the rest patients were set as a control group using clips. The safety and effectiveness of continuous sutures and clips to clamp the post-EMR/ESD mucosal/submucosal defect were compared in the two groups. The complete mucosal/submucosa defects closure rates were the primary outcome.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hosptial

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100039, China

About this study

Endoscopic submucosal resection (EMR) or submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastrointestinal lesions were used to treat early gastrointestinal cancer or large benign polyps, and their complete resection rates were high, which greatly reduce unnecessary surgical operations. However, after endoscopic resection of mucosal/submucosal lesions, large mucosal/submucosal defects may be created. These defects may cause more delayed postoperative adverse events (bleeding, perforation). The use of clips to completely seal the mucosal defect after gastrointestinal mucosal/submucosal lesion resection can significantly reduce postoperative adverse events, but the rate of incomplete mucosal defects closure is high. The surgical sutures combined with clips to close the mucosal defect after surgery significantly increased the complete closure rates of the post-EMR/ESD mucosal/submucosal defect. This study intends to further determine its safety and effectiveness through a clinical randomized controlled study, and standardize indications and contraindications. A total of 62 enrolled patients were allocated into two groups, 31 patients were set as a treatment group using continuous suture technique to close post-EMR/ESD mucosal/submucosal defects, the rest patients were set as a control group using clips. The safety and effectiveness of continuous sutures and clips to clamp the post-EMR/ESD mucosal/submucosal defect were compared in the two groups. The primary outcome was complete mucosal/submucosa defects closure rates. The secondary outcomes were the closure time, closure speed, and immediate bleeding during the operation as well as delayed bleeding, delayed perforation, and polyps syndrome after resection.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The indications for endoscopic resection were large (≥20mm in diameter), nonpedunculated, benign, and early malignant mucosal or submucosal gastric or colorectal lesions.
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • The tumor has spread to the muscularis layer, lymph nodes, or distal metastases;
  • Multiple lesions (≥20mm in diameter) ;
  • Underlying bleeding disorder;
  • The platelet count less than 50×10^9/L;
  • Serious cardio-pulmonary, hepatic or renal disease;
  • Intolerance to endoscopy;
  • Other high-risk conditions or disease (such as massive ascites, etc.);
  • Pregnancy.

Treatment and study plan

Cotinuous suture

Device

Cotinuous suture using surgery thread

Clips

Device

Hemostatic clips

Primary outcomes

  1. The rates of complete closure of mucosal/submucosal defects

    Time frame: 1day

    When the clips were applied next to each other and there were no substantial submucosal areas in the closure line

Secondary outcomes

  1. The duration time of closure

    Time frame: 1 day

    The duration of closure was defined as the interval from insertion of the first clip until complete or incomplete closure

  2. The closure speed

    Time frame: 1day

    The closure speed was defined as the resection area divided by 10x the duration of the ligation procedure (cm2 /10 minutes).

  3. Immediate bleeding

    Time frame: 1 day

    Immediate bleeding refers to those episodes of hemorrhage that occurred during the procedure and lasted more than 30 seconds or required endoscopic treatment.

  4. Delayed bleeding

    Time frame: 14 days

    Delayed bleeding was defined as bleeding requiring emergency endoscopic hemostasis or transfusion or the presence of hemoglobin loss≥2 g/dL after EMR/ESD

  5. Delayed perforation

    Time frame: 14 days

    Delayed perforation was defined as the presence of free air on abdominal CT or radiography after completion of the procedure in patients without perforation during EMR/ESD and no symptoms of peritoneal irritation after EMR/ESD

  6. Post polypectomy syndrome

    Time frame: 14 days

    Post polypectomy syndrome was defined by symptoms of pain, fever, leukocytosis, peritoneal tenderness, and guarding.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Affiliated Hospital to Academy of Military Medical Sciences

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Clinical Study on Continuous Suture of Mucosal Defects After Endoscopic Mucosal Lesion Resection

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Jan 13, 2022
Registry last updated
Apr 2, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.