Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
NCT Number: NCT02004535
The objective of this study is to investigate benefits of binaural hearing for non-traditional cochlear implant candidates (with Asymmetric Hearing Loss). Asymmetric candidates are patients with severe to profound hearing loss in one ear and better hearing in the other ear. (One ear is deaf and the other ear has better hearing and in most cases uses a hearing aid.) The investigators hypothesize that cochlear implantation of the poorer ear provides a functional increase in word and sentence understanding in quiet or noise, perceived benefit, localization ability, and other measures of auditory performance relative to use of the better hearing ear alone.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Multichannel cochlear implants have been highly successful in restoring speech understanding in adults and children who have congenital or acquired bilateral profound or severe-to-profound sensorineural (permanent) hearing loss. As implant technology has continued to develop and post-implant performance of patients has improved, the patient selection criteria has broadened to include patients with less severe hearing loss. Further, results from studies where patients received bilateral cochlear implants have demonstrated not only improved performance but the feasibility of integrating signals from both ears.
In contrast to persons with bilateral severe-to-profound hearing loss, persons who have only one ear with profound or severe-to-profound hearing loss and the other ear with substantially less hearing loss have not, to date, been considered cochlear implant candidates. This is because it has been assumed they will do well enough with a conventional hearing aid in the better ear. A problem with this assumption is that even with an appropriately fit better ear hearing aid, many of these hearing-impaired individuals still experience significant difficulties in speech understanding in their everyday listening environments, along with significant communication handicaps that interfere with their employment and quality of life.
Previous studies that have examined the performance of patients who have more symmetrical hearing loss and who wear a cochlear implant on one ear and a power hearing aid on the other ear, have illustrated that the two inputs can be combined and provide binaural hearing benefits. It is hypothesized in this study that patients with an asymmetrical sensorineural hearing loss may also receive significant binaural benefit from having a cochlear implant on the poorer ear along with an appropriately fit hearing aid on the better ear. That is, this study examines whether patients with asymmetrical sensorineural hearing loss can utilize both types of input (acoustic to one ear and electric to the other) effectively, and combine them to receive binaural hearing assistance for improving speech understanding, localization ability, and patient satisfaction.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The standard surgical procedure for a cochlear implant will be used. The asymmetric participant will receive the cochlear implant in the deaf ear.
Time frame: Change from Pre-implant baseline localization at 12 months post-implant
Sound localization using a 140 degree, horizontal plane loudspeaker arc
Time frame: Pre-implant and 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months post-implant
Speech recognition will be assessed with word and sentence material for the each ear individually as well as bilaterally (both ears together). Testing will be completed in quiet and in the presence of background noise.
Time frame: Pre-implant and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-implant
Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale (SSQ; Gatehouse and Noble,2004) will be completed by participants. The SSQ is a 49-item questionnaire that uses a 10-point rating scale (where a 0 rating reflects least ability and 10 reflects greatest ability) to evaluate the effects of hearing loss in terms of disability and function across three domains: Speech Hearing, Spatial Hearing, and Qualities of Hearing.
Time frame: Pre-implant and 12 months post-implant
processing speed, visuospatial working memory, and perceptual effort
Washington University School of Medicine
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05219474
Ear Diseases, Hearing Disorders
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01805167
Ear Diseases, Hearing Disorders
Nice, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05070429
Aging, Ear Diseases
Hagerstown, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07501312
Ear Diseases, Hearing Disorders
Aurora, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details