Eurofins Dermscan Pharmascan
Villeurbanne, 69100, France
NCT Number: NCT05215054
The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of Gana V, a Poly L-lactic acid filler for the aesthetic treatment of nasolabial folds, in comparison with Sculptra.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me30 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Villeurbanne, 69100, France
A screening visit will allow to inform and preselect the participants.
On D0, baseline scoring, fringe projection acquisitions and photographs will be done before injection. Eligible participants will receive a first injection of the two products according to the randomization list. Immediately after injection, injector's treatment satisfaction will be collected. Investigator evaluator will collect Adverse Events (AEs) and Injection Site Reactions (ISRs) immediately after injection.
A month and a half after initial injection (M11/2), clinical scoring, fringe projection acquisitions and photographs will be done before touch-up (if applicable). Participant's treatment satisfaction and injector's treatment satisfaction (if applicable) will be collected. A touch-up injection will be made if necessary, according to injector and participant opinion. Investigator evaluator will collect AEs and ISRs before and after touch-up if applicable.
Three (M3), six (M6), nine (M9), twelve (M12), eighteen (M18) and twenty-four (M24) months after initial injection, clinical scoring, fringe projection acquisitions and photographs will be done. Participant's treatment satisfaction will be collected. Investigator evaluator will collect AEs and ISRs
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Injection in the deep dermis and subcutaneous layer of the nasolabial fold on D0 (initial injection) and 1 month and a half after initial injection if necessary (optional touch-up).
Injection in the deep dermis and subcutaneous layer of the nasolabial fold on D0 (initial injection) and 1 month and a half after initial injection if necessary (optional touch-up).
Time frame: Baseline and Month 6
The Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale is a scale for measurement of the nasolabial folds wrinkles severity.
The scale ranges from Grade 1 (absent-better outcome) to Grade 5 (extreme-worse outcome) Change of grades was calculated as the value at 6 months minus the value at baseline. To observe an improvement of the nasolabial folds wrinkles, a decrease of the mean score was expected.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1^1/2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 18 and Month 24
The Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale is a scale for measurement of the nasolabial folds wrinkles severity.
The scale ranges from Grade 1 (absent-better outcome) to Grade 5 (extreme-worse outcome) Change of grades was calculated as the value at month X minus the value at baseline. To observe an improvement of the nasolabial folds wrinkles, a decrease of the mean score was expected.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1^1/2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 18 and Month 24
The Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale is a scale for measurement of the nasolabial folds wrinkles severity.
The scale ranges from Grade 1 (absent-better outcome) to Grade 5 (extreme-worse outcome) Responders rate = percentage of participants with an improvement of at least one grade in WSRS compared to baseline score. An improvement represents a decrease in WSRS (from grade 5 to grade 4 for instance)
Time frame: Month 1^1/2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 18 and Month 24
Percentage of participants with an improvement on GAIS. A responder is defined as a subject having "Improved", "Much improved" or "Very much improved" score according to GAIS.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1^1/2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 18 and Month 24
The average depth of the nasolabial folds wrinkles was calculated using a fringe projection system. An increase of the mean value means a positive outcome.
Change was calculated as the value at each follow-up visit minus the value at baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1^1/2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 18 and Month 24
The volume of the nasolabial folds wrinkles was calculated using a fringe projection system. A decrease of the volume means a positive outcome.
Time frame: Month 1^1/2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 18 and Month 24
Percentage of participants with positive answers to an internal questionnaire
Time frame: After initial injection (Day 0) and touch-up if applicable (Month 1^1/2)
Percentage of participants
Time frame: Day 0, Month 1^1/2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 18 and Month 24
Proportion of subjects presenting at least one ISR of any severity
Time frame: Day 0 to Month 24
Number of Adverse Events (AEs) Number of Adverse Device Effects (ADEs) Proportion of subjects with at least one AE Proportion of subject with at least one ADE
GCS Co., Ltd
Industry
Clinical Study for the Safety and Effectiveness of Use of an Injectable Medical Device GANA V® for Facial Aesthetic Treatment
Acronym: PLLA
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04162496
Aging, Rhytides
Boynton Beach, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04717934
Wrinkle
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03228641
Disease Attributes, Facial and Neck Skin Laxity
Sacramento, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04577898
Infra-orbital Hollows, Tear-trough Deformity
Encino, California, United States
View Trial Details